Adams-Oliver syndrome 6

disease
On this page

Also known as Adams-Oliver syndrome caused by mutation in DLL4Adams-Oliver syndrome type 6AOS6DLL4 Adams-Oliver syndrome

Summary

Adams-Oliver syndrome 6 (MONDO:0014703) is a disease caused by DLL4 (GenCC Definitive), with 2 cohort genes.

At a glance

  • Causal gene: DLL4 (GenCC Definitive)
  • Cohort genes: 2
  • ClinVar variants: 28

Clinical features

No curated clinical features (Orphanet) for this disease.

Identifiers

Disease identifiers

FieldValue
Canonical nameAdams-Oliver syndrome 6
Mondo IDMONDO:0014703
OMIM616589
UMLSC4225271
MedGen908556
GARD0016142
Is cancer (heuristic)no

Also known as: Adams-Oliver syndrome 6 · Adams-Oliver syndrome caused by mutation in DLL4 · Adams-Oliver syndrome type 6 · AOS6 · DLL4 Adams-Oliver syndrome

Data availability: 28 ClinVar variants · 3 GenCC gene-disease records.

Disease family

Classification path: disease › human disease › disease by etiologic mechanism › disease of genetic or genomic mechanism › hereditary diseaseAdams-Oliver syndromeAdams-Oliver syndrome 6

Related subtypes (5): Adams-Oliver syndrome 2, Adams-Oliver syndrome 3, Adams-Oliver syndrome 4, Adams-Oliver syndrome 5, Adams-Oliver syndrome 1

Genetics & variants

GWAS landscape

No GWAS associations recorded — common-variant (GWAS) studies don’t cover this disease (typical for Mendelian / rare diseases). See the curated gene cohort and Mendelian overlap below.

Variant details and genetic-evidence tiers

ClinVar germline variants

28 retrieved; paginated sample, class counts are floors:

9 pathogenic, 8 likely pathogenic, 7 uncertain significance, 2 conflicting classifications of pathogenicity, 2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic

ClinVarVariant (HGVS)GeneClassificationReview
204368NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.1660C>T (p.Gln554Ter)DLL4Pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
204369NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.1672C>T (p.Arg558Ter)DLL4Pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
204371NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.1169G>A (p.Cys390Tyr)DLL4Pathogenic/Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
204372NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.1168T>C (p.Cys390Arg)DLL4Pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
204373NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.556C>T (p.Arg186Cys)DLL4Pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
204375NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.361G>C (p.Ala121Pro)DLL4Pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
3651482NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.1750C>T (p.Gln584Ter)DLL4Pathogenic/Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
523582NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.1825C>T (p.Gln609Ter)DLL4Pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
523591NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.1310G>C (p.Cys437Ser)DLL4Pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
523592NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.1397G>A (p.Cys466Tyr)DLL4Pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
929444NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.1857_1864del (p.Pro621fs)DLL4Pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
1320129NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.784G>A (p.Gly262Ser)DLL4Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
2506498NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.1396T>C (p.Cys466Arg)DLL4Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
3066222NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.187A>G (p.Lys63Glu)DLL4Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
3254751NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.329C>T (p.Thr110Ile)DLL4Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
3600511NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.1424G>C (p.Cys475Ser)DLL4Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
523590NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.949A>C (p.Thr317Pro)DLL4Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
800940NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.1392C>A (p.Cys464Ter)DLL4Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
992895NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.82G>C (p.Gly28Arg)DLL4Likely pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
1345645NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.382G>A (p.Asp128Asn)DLL4Conflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
2217867NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.1102G>A (p.Asp368Asn)DLL4Conflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
204374NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.799C>A (p.Pro267Thr)DLL4Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
2575222NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.1429G>T (p.Val477Leu)DLL4Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
3065445NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.1109C>T (p.Pro370Leu)DLL4Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
3602109NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.1844A>G (p.Tyr615Cys)DLL4Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
523604NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.265_267del (p.Phe89del)DLL4Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
523605NM_019074.4(DLL4):c.1240+5G>CDLL4Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
659370NM_015512.5(DNAH1):c.4670C>T (p.Thr1557Met)DNAH1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Genes & proteins

Mendelian disease overlap and somatic drivers

GenCC: 5 · Orphanet: 4 · OMIM-shared: 0 · Dual-evidence (GWAS+Mendelian): 0

GenCC gene–disease validity (cohort genes)

the Disease column is the GenCC-asserted condition — a cohort gene’s strongest validity may be for a related predisposition syndrome.

GeneClassificationInheritanceDiseaseRecords
DLL4DefinitiveAutosomal dominantAdams-Oliver syndrome 65

Orphanet rare-disease linkage (cohort genes)

GeneOrphanet IDRare disease
DLL4Orphanet:1114Aplasia cutis congenita
DLL4Orphanet:974Adams-Oliver syndrome
DNAH1Orphanet:244Primary ciliary dyskinesia
DNAH1Orphanet:276234Non-syndromic male infertility due to sperm motility disorder

Cohort genes → proteins

2 cohort genes, 2 distinct canonical proteins.

Evidence partition

SubsetGenes
multi_evidence2

Cohort genes (full)

SymbolHGNCEnsemblUniProtNameEvidence
DLL4HGNC:2910ENSG00000128917Q9NR61Delta-like protein 4gencc,clinvar
DNAH1HGNC:2940ENSG00000114841Q9P2D7Dynein axonemal heavy chain 1clinvar

Cohort function summary

Lead sentence per gene, UniProt-curated.

SymbolProtein nameFunction (lead sentence)
DLL4Delta-like protein 4Involved in the Notch signaling pathway as Notch ligand.
DNAH1Dynein axonemal heavy chain 1Force generating protein of cilia required for sperm flagellum motility.

Protein-family classification

Druggable: 0 · Difficult: 0 · Unknown: 2 · Druggable fraction: 0.0

Family distribution

Cohort families vs a genome-wide background (hypergeometric, BH-FDR; fold = observed/expected). Counts kept; sorted by enrichment, so the catch-all Other/Unknown bucket no longer leads.

FamilyGenesFoldFDR
Other/Unknown21.8×0.312

Per-gene assignment

SymbolFamilyDruggable?ECInterPro (top 3)
DLL4Other/UnknownnoEGF-type_Asp/Asn_hydroxyl_site, EGF, DSL
DNAH1Other/UnknownnoDhc_D6_P-loop, Dhc_linker, Dhc_D4

Expression context

Cohort genes with no expression data: 0.

2 cohort genes are a single-cell marker in ≥1 SCXA experiment.

Breadth distribution (Bgee present_calls)

BucketGenes
narrow (1-5 tissues)0
moderate (6-20)0
broad (>20)2
unknown0

Top tissues across cohort

TissueCohort genes
apex of heart1
body of tongue1
vena cava1
bronchial epithelial cell1
bronchus1
right uterine tube1

Per-gene tissue summary (top 30)

SymbolBgee breadthFANTOM5 breadthSCXATop tissues
DLL4188broadmarkervena cava, apex of heart, body of tongue
DNAH1183tissue_specificmarkerright uterine tube, bronchial epithelial cell, bronchus

Protein interactions among cohort

Intra-cohort edges: 0.

Hub genes (top 10 by interactor count)

SymbolInteractor count
DLL42,749
DNAH11,699

Structural data

PDB: 2 · AlphaFold-only: 0 · No structure: 0

Cohort genes with PDB structures (top 30)

SymbolUniProtPDB entries
DNAH1Q9P2D72
DLL4Q9NR611

Function

Pathway analysis

Distinct Reactome pathways touched by cohort: 8. Enrichment computed across 2 evidence-associated genes (1 with Reactome annotation).

Pathways by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 1 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

PathwayCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
Constitutive Signaling by NOTCH1 t(7;9)(NOTCH1:M1580_K2555) Translocation Mutant11631.4×0.004DLL4
NOTCH4 Activation and Transmission of Signal to the Nucleus11038.2×0.004DLL4
Constitutive Signaling by NOTCH1 HD Domain Mutants1761.3×0.004DLL4
NOTCH3 Activation and Transmission of Signal to the Nucleus1475.8×0.004DLL4
NOTCH2 Activation and Transmission of Signal to the Nucleus1439.2×0.004DLL4
Activated NOTCH1 Transmits Signal to the Nucleus1356.9×0.004DLL4
Constitutive Signaling by NOTCH1 PEST Domain Mutants1196.9×0.005DLL4
Constitutive Signaling by NOTCH1 HD+PEST Domain Mutants1196.9×0.005DLL4

GO biological processes by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 2 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

GO termCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
blood vessel lumenization14213.0×0.004DLL4
ventral spinal cord interneuron fate commitment12808.7×0.004DLL4
regulation of neural retina development12808.7×0.004DLL4
cardiac atrium morphogenesis11404.3×0.005DLL4
pericardium morphogenesis11053.2×0.005DLL4
dorsal aorta morphogenesis11053.2×0.005DLL4
negative regulation of blood vessel endothelial cell proliferation involved in sprouting angiogenesis11053.2×0.005DLL4
cardiac ventricle morphogenesis1936.2×0.005DLL4
cilium-dependent cell motility1702.2×0.005DNAH1
ventricular trabecula myocardium morphogenesis1526.6×0.006DLL4
negative regulation of cell migration involved in sprouting angiogenesis1495.6×0.006DLL4
inner dynein arm assembly1443.5×0.006DNAH1
epithelial cilium movement involved in extracellular fluid movement1383.0×0.006DNAH1
negative regulation of endothelial cell migration1383.0×0.006DLL4
positive regulation of neural precursor cell proliferation1383.0×0.006DLL4
cellular response to vascular endothelial growth factor stimulus1280.9×0.007DLL4
cellular response to fibroblast growth factor stimulus1271.8×0.007DLL4
branching involved in blood vessel morphogenesis1263.3×0.007DLL4
sperm axoneme assembly1234.1×0.007DNAH1
aortic valve morphogenesis1216.1×0.007DLL4
negative regulation of Notch signaling pathway1216.1×0.007DLL4
regulation of neurogenesis1200.6×0.007DLL4
blood vessel remodeling1191.5×0.007DLL4
T cell differentiation1191.5×0.007DLL4
positive regulation of Notch signaling pathway1175.5×0.008DLL4
Notch signaling pathway170.8×0.018DLL4
flagellated sperm motility158.5×0.021DNAH1
visual perception139.8×0.030DLL4
negative regulation of gene expression134.5×0.034DLL4
angiogenesis131.2×0.036DLL4

Therapeutics

Drug target analysis

Approved (phase 4): 0 · Phase ≥3: 0 · Phased (≥1): 0 · Undrugged: 2

Druggability breadth: 1 of 2 evidence-associated genes (50%) have a ChEMBL target (buckets above are over the deeply-mined display cohort).

Top cohort targets by molecule count

SymbolMoleculesMax phase
DLL400
DNAH100

Bioactivity and enzyme data

Enzyme cohort genes (≥1 EC): 0.

Pharmacogenomics

Cohort genes with a PharmGKB record: 2; with CPIC/DPWG dosing guidelines: 0.

No cohort gene has a CPIC/DPWG genotype-guided dosing guideline (PharmGKB).

Chemical tractability of cohort targets

0 approved/phased compounds have measured bioactivity against a cohort gene (and aren’t yet in disease-level trials). This is a research / tractability signal, NOT a therapeutic recommendation — a bioactivity row often reflects off-target or screening binding (e.g. promiscuous kinase inhibitors against a cohort kinase), implying no disease mechanism.

Druggability pyramid

Cohort genes binned by druggability tier (high → low):

TierDefinitionGenesSymbols
AApproved (phase 4 drug)0
BPhased (≥1) drug, not yet approved0
CDruggable family + PDB, no drug0
DDruggable family + AlphaFold only, no drug0
EDifficult family or no structure, no drug2DLL4, DNAH1

Undrugged target profiles

2 cohort genes are undrugged. Ranked by ‘starting-point quality’ (assay depth + drugged-partner adjacency).

SymbolChEMBL assaysDrugged partners (top 3)
DLL40
DNAH10

Clinical trials & evidence

Clinical trials

Clinical trials: 0.