Bardet-Biedl syndrome 22

disease
On this page

Also known as Bardet-Biedl syndrome 20BBS20Bardet-Biedl syndrome caused by mutation in IFT74Bardet-Biedl syndrome type 20IFT74 Bardet-Biedl syndrome

Summary

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 22 (MONDO:0014926) is a disease caused by IFT74 (GenCC Definitive), with 2 cohort genes.

At a glance

  • Causal gene: IFT74 (GenCC Definitive)
  • Cohort genes: 2
  • ClinVar variants: 16

Clinical features

No curated clinical features (Orphanet) for this disease.

Identifiers

Disease identifiers

FieldValue
Canonical nameBardet-Biedl syndrome 22
Mondo IDMONDO:0014926
OMIM617119
DOIDDOID:0081011
UMLSC5561936
MedGen1794146
GARD0016193
Is cancer (heuristic)no

Also known as: Bardet-Biedl syndrome 20; BBS20 · Bardet-Biedl syndrome caused by mutation in IFT74 · Bardet-Biedl syndrome type 20 · BBS20 · IFT74 Bardet-Biedl syndrome

Data availability: 16 ClinVar variants · 2 GenCC gene-disease records.

Disease family

Classification path: disease › human disease › disease by body system or component › syndromic diseaseBardet-Biedl syndromeBardet-Biedl syndrome 22

Related subtypes (21): Bardet-Biedl syndrome 1, Bardet-Biedl syndrome 3, Bardet-Biedl syndrome 6, Bardet-Biedl syndrome 2, Bardet-Biedl syndrome 4, Bardet-Biedl syndrome 5, Bardet-Biedl syndrome 7, Bardet-Biedl syndrome 8, Bardet-Biedl syndrome 9, Bardet-Biedl syndrome 10, Bardet-Biedl syndrome 11, Bardet-Biedl syndrome 12, Bardet-Biedl syndrome 13, Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14, Bardet-Biedl syndrome 15, Bardet-Biedl syndrome 16, Bardet-Biedl syndrome 17, Bardet-Biedl syndrome 18, Bardet-Biedl syndrome 19, Bardet-Biedl syndrome 20, bardet-biedl syndrome 21

Genetics & variants

GWAS landscape

No GWAS associations recorded — common-variant (GWAS) studies don’t cover this disease (typical for Mendelian / rare diseases). See the curated gene cohort and Mendelian overlap below.

Variant details and genetic-evidence tiers

ClinVar germline variants

16 retrieved; paginated sample, class counts are floors:

6 uncertain significance, 3 benign, 3 pathogenic/likely pathogenic, 2 pathogenic, 1 likely pathogenic, 1 conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

ClinVarVariant (HGVS)GeneClassificationReview
1192529NM_025103.4(IFT74):c.371_372del (p.Gln124fs)IFT74Pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
1925311NM_025103.4(IFT74):c.358G>T (p.Glu120Ter)IFT74Pathogenic/Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
254276NM_025103.4(IFT74):c.1685-1G>TIFT74Pathogenic/Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
4082009NM_025103.4(IFT74):c.727G>T (p.Glu243Ter)IFT74Pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
431748GRCh38/hg38 9p21.2(chr9:27040565-27060992)IFT74Pathogenic/Likely pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
3068540NM_025103.4(IFT74):c.909dup (p.Glu304fs)IFT74Likely pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
684551NM_025103.4(IFT74):c.163A>T (p.Ile55Leu)IFT74Conflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
849763NM_015662.3(IFT172):c.1478T>G (p.Leu493Arg)IFT172Uncertain significancecriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
869114NM_015662.3(IFT172):c.2155C>T (p.His719Tyr)IFT172Uncertain significancecriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
1028870NM_025103.4(IFT74):c.94T>C (p.Ser32Pro)IFT74Uncertain significancecriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
2170750NM_025103.4(IFT74):c.1343G>A (p.Arg448His)IFT74Uncertain significancecriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
2267201NM_025103.4(IFT74):c.1492A>G (p.Ile498Val)IFT74Uncertain significancecriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
3242550NM_025103.4(IFT74):c.1624-1G>AIFT74Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
1246135NM_025103.4(IFT74):c.1790C>T (p.Thr597Ile)IFT74Benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
1247882NM_025103.4(IFT74):c.165A>G (p.Ile55Met)IFT74Benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
1265179NM_025103.4(IFT74):c.254A>G (p.Lys85Arg)IFT74Benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Genes & proteins

Mendelian disease overlap and somatic drivers

GenCC: 5 · Orphanet: 7 · OMIM-shared: 0 · Dual-evidence (GWAS+Mendelian): 0

GenCC gene–disease validity (cohort genes)

the Disease column is the GenCC-asserted condition — a cohort gene’s strongest validity may be for a related predisposition syndrome.

GeneClassificationInheritanceDiseaseRecords
IFT74DefinitiveAutosomal recessiveBardet-Biedl syndrome 225

Orphanet rare-disease linkage (cohort genes)

GeneOrphanet IDRare disease
IFT74Orphanet:110Bardet-Biedl syndrome
IFT74Orphanet:137893Male infertility due to large-headed multiflagellar polyploid spermatozoa
IFT74Orphanet:475Isolated Joubert syndrome
IFT172Orphanet:110Bardet-Biedl syndrome
IFT172Orphanet:140969Saldino-Mainzer syndrome
IFT172Orphanet:474Jeune syndrome
IFT172Orphanet:791Retinitis pigmentosa

Cohort genes → proteins

2 cohort genes, 2 distinct canonical proteins.

Evidence partition

SubsetGenes
multi_evidence2

Cohort genes (full)

SymbolHGNCEnsemblUniProtNameEvidence
IFT74HGNC:21424ENSG00000096872Q96LB3Intraflagellar transport protein 74 homologgencc,clinvar
IFT172HGNC:30391ENSG00000138002Q9UG01Intraflagellar transport protein 172 homologclinvar

Cohort function summary

Lead sentence per gene, UniProt-curated.

SymbolProtein nameFunction (lead sentence)
IFT74Intraflagellar transport protein 74 homologComponent of the intraflagellar transport (IFT) complex B: together with IFT81, forms a tubulin-binding module that specifically mediates transport of tubulin within the cilium.
IFT172Intraflagellar transport protein 172 homologRequired for the maintenance and formation of cilia.

Protein-family classification

Druggable: 0 · Difficult: 1 · Unknown: 1 · Druggable fraction: 0.0

Family distribution

Cohort families vs a genome-wide background (hypergeometric, BH-FDR; fold = observed/expected). Counts kept; sorted by enrichment, so the catch-all Other/Unknown bucket no longer leads.

FamilyGenesFoldFDR
Scaffold/PPI18.6×0.225
Other/Unknown10.9×0.805

Per-gene assignment

SymbolFamilyDruggable?ECInterPro (top 3)
IFT74Other/UnknownnoIFT74
IFT172Scaffold/PPInoWD40_rpt, TPR-like_helical_dom_sf, WD40/YVTN_repeat-like_dom_sf

Expression context

Cohort genes with no expression data: 0.

2 cohort genes are a single-cell marker in ≥1 SCXA experiment.

Breadth distribution (Bgee present_calls)

BucketGenes
narrow (1-5 tissues)0
moderate (6-20)0
broad (>20)2
unknown0

Top tissues across cohort

TissueCohort genes
bronchial epithelial cell2
right uterine tube2
caput epididymis1
left testis1

Per-gene tissue summary (top 30)

SymbolBgee breadthFANTOM5 breadthSCXATop tissues
IFT74272ubiquitousmarkerbronchial epithelial cell, caput epididymis, right uterine tube
IFT172236ubiquitousmarkerright uterine tube, bronchial epithelial cell, left testis

Protein interactions among cohort

Intra-cohort edges: 1.

Hub genes (top 10 by interactor count)

SymbolInteractor count
IFT741,937
IFT1721,922

Intra-cohort edges

ABSources
IFT172IFT74biogrid_interaction, string_interaction

Structural data

PDB: 1 · AlphaFold-only: 1 · No structure: 0

Cohort genes with PDB structures (top 30)

SymbolUniProtPDB entries
IFT172Q9UG011

AlphaFold-only cohort genes (top 30 by pLDDT)

SymbolUniProtpLDDT
IFT74Q96LB381.21

Function

Pathway analysis

Distinct Reactome pathways touched by cohort: 2. Enrichment computed across 2 evidence-associated genes (2 with Reactome annotation).

Pathways by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 2 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

PathwayCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
Intraflagellar transport2200.3×5e-05IFT74, IFT172
Hedgehog ‘off’ state189.2×0.011IFT172

GO biological processes by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 2 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

GO termCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
intraciliary anterograde transport2887.0×3e-05IFT74, IFT172
negative regulation of keratinocyte proliferation2702.2×3e-05IFT74, IFT172
keratinocyte proliferation2581.1×3e-05IFT74, IFT172
non-motile cilium assembly2290.6×9e-05IFT74, IFT172
Notch signaling pathway2141.6×3e-04IFT74, IFT172
hindgut development18426.0×6e-04IFT172
cilium assembly273.6×8e-04IFT74, IFT172
intraciliary transport involved in cilium assembly11203.7×0.003IFT74
keratinocyte development1766.0×0.004IFT74
left/right axis specification1601.9×0.005IFT172
embryonic camera-type eye morphogenesis1561.7×0.005IFT172
positive regulation of cell adhesion mediated by integrin1526.6×0.005IFT74
spinal cord motor neuron differentiation1468.1×0.005IFT172
intraciliary transport1280.9×0.008IFT172
negative regulation of smoothened signaling pathway1227.7×0.008IFT172
dorsal/ventral pattern formation1210.7×0.008IFT172
positive regulation of smoothened signaling pathway1210.7×0.008IFT172
limb development1205.5×0.008IFT172
cytoplasmic microtubule organization1172.0×0.009IFT172
bone development1138.1×0.011IFT172
heart looping1133.8×0.011IFT172
determination of left/right symmetry1127.7×0.011IFT74
roof of mouth development1123.9×0.011IFT172
epidermis development1105.3×0.012IFT172
neural tube closure193.6×0.013IFT172
smoothened signaling pathway190.6×0.013IFT172
protein processing185.1×0.013IFT172
brain development139.8×0.026IFT172
heart development139.4×0.026IFT74
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II17.4×0.130IFT74

Therapeutics

Drug target analysis

Approved (phase 4): 0 · Phase ≥3: 0 · Phased (≥1): 0 · Undrugged: 2

Druggability breadth: 0 of 2 evidence-associated genes (0%) have a ChEMBL target (buckets above are over the deeply-mined display cohort).

Top cohort targets by molecule count

SymbolMoleculesMax phase
IFT7400
IFT17200

Bioactivity and enzyme data

Enzyme cohort genes (≥1 EC): 0.

Pharmacogenomics

Cohort genes with a PharmGKB record: 2; with CPIC/DPWG dosing guidelines: 0.

No cohort gene has a CPIC/DPWG genotype-guided dosing guideline (PharmGKB).

Chemical tractability of cohort targets

0 approved/phased compounds have measured bioactivity against a cohort gene (and aren’t yet in disease-level trials). This is a research / tractability signal, NOT a therapeutic recommendation — a bioactivity row often reflects off-target or screening binding (e.g. promiscuous kinase inhibitors against a cohort kinase), implying no disease mechanism.

Druggability pyramid

Cohort genes binned by druggability tier (high → low):

TierDefinitionGenesSymbols
AApproved (phase 4 drug)0
BPhased (≥1) drug, not yet approved0
CDruggable family + PDB, no drug0
DDruggable family + AlphaFold only, no drug0
EDifficult family or no structure, no drug2IFT74, IFT172

Undrugged target profiles

2 cohort genes are undrugged. Ranked by ‘starting-point quality’ (assay depth + drugged-partner adjacency).

SymbolChEMBL assaysDrugged partners (top 3)
IFT740
IFT1720

Clinical trials & evidence

Clinical trials

Clinical trials: 0.