Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 3, digenic

disease
On this page

Also known as FSHD3

Summary

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 3, digenic (MONDO:0030354) is a disease with 1 cohort gene.

At a glance

  • Cohort genes: 1
  • ClinVar variants: 1

Clinical features

No curated clinical features (Orphanet) for this disease.

Identifiers

Disease identifiers

FieldValue
Canonical namefacioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 3, digenic
Mondo IDMONDO:0030354
OMIM619477
DOIDDOID:0060917
UMLSC5561959
MedGen1794169
GARD0025548
Is cancer (heuristic)no

Also known as: facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 3, digenic · FSHD3

Data availability: 1 ClinVar variant · 1 GenCC gene-disease record.

Disease family

Classification path: disease › human disease › disease by body system or component › musculoskeletal system disordermuscle tissue disorderskeletal muscle disordermyopathymuscular dystrophyprogressive muscular dystrophyfacioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophyfacioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 3, digenic

Related subtypes (4): facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 1, facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 2, muscular dystrophy, scapulohumeral, facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 4, digenic

Genetics & variants

GWAS landscape

No GWAS associations recorded — common-variant (GWAS) studies don’t cover this disease (typical for Mendelian / rare diseases). See the curated gene cohort and Mendelian overlap below.

Variant details and genetic-evidence tiers

ClinVar germline variants

1 retrieved; paginated sample, class counts are floors:

1 pathogenic

ClinVarVariant (HGVS)GeneClassificationReview
1202610NM_018372.4(LRIF1):c.869_872dup (p.Trp291Ter)LRIF1Pathogenicno assertion criteria provided

Genes & proteins

Mendelian disease overlap and somatic drivers

GenCC: 2 · Orphanet: 0 · OMIM-shared: 0 · Dual-evidence (GWAS+Mendelian): 0

GenCC gene–disease validity (cohort genes)

the Disease column is the GenCC-asserted condition — a cohort gene’s strongest validity may be for a related predisposition syndrome.

GeneClassificationInheritanceDiseaseRecords
LRIF1ModerateAutosomal recessivefacioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy2

Cohort genes → proteins

1 cohort genes, 1 distinct canonical proteins.

Evidence partition

SubsetGenes
multi_evidence1

Cohort genes (full)

SymbolHGNCEnsemblUniProtNameEvidence
LRIF1HGNC:30299ENSG00000121931Q5T3J3Ligand-dependent nuclear receptor-interacting factor 1gencc,clinvar

Cohort function summary

Lead sentence per gene, UniProt-curated.

SymbolProtein nameFunction (lead sentence)
LRIF1Ligand-dependent nuclear receptor-interacting factor 1Together with SMCHD1, involved in chromosome X inactivation in females by promoting the compaction of heterochromatin.

Protein-family classification

Druggable: 0 · Difficult: 0 · Unknown: 1 · Druggable fraction: 0.0

Family distribution

Cohort families vs a genome-wide background (hypergeometric, BH-FDR; fold = observed/expected). Counts kept; sorted by enrichment, so the catch-all Other/Unknown bucket no longer leads.

FamilyGenesFoldFDR
Other/Unknown11.8×0.558

Per-gene assignment

SymbolFamilyDruggable?ECInterPro (top 3)
LRIF1Other/UnknownnoLRIF1

Expression context

Cohort genes with no expression data: 0.

1 cohort gene are a single-cell marker in ≥1 SCXA experiment.

Breadth distribution (Bgee present_calls)

BucketGenes
narrow (1-5 tissues)0
moderate (6-20)0
broad (>20)1
unknown0

Top tissues across cohort

TissueCohort genes
calcaneal tendon1
male germ line stem cell (sensu Vertebrata) in testis1
primordial germ cell in gonad1

Per-gene tissue summary (top 30)

SymbolBgee breadthFANTOM5 breadthSCXATop tissues
LRIF1271ubiquitousmarkercalcaneal tendon, primordial germ cell in gonad, male germ line stem cell (sensu Vertebrata) in testis

Protein interactions among cohort

Intra-cohort edges: 0.

Hub genes (top 10 by interactor count)

SymbolInteractor count
LRIF11,295

Structural data

PDB: 0 · AlphaFold-only: 1 · No structure: 0

AlphaFold-only cohort genes (top 30 by pLDDT)

SymbolUniProtpLDDT
LRIF1Q5T3J348.88

Function

Pathway analysis

Distinct Reactome pathways touched by cohort: 0. Enrichment computed across 1 evidence-associated genes (0 with Reactome annotation).

GO biological processes by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 1 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

GO termCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
dosage compensation by inactivation of X chromosome11532.0×0.001LRIF1
regulation of DNA-templated transcription131.6×0.032LRIF1

Therapeutics

Drug target analysis

Approved (phase 4): 0 · Phase ≥3: 0 · Phased (≥1): 0 · Undrugged: 1

Druggability breadth: 0 of 1 evidence-associated genes (0%) have a ChEMBL target (buckets above are over the deeply-mined display cohort).

Top cohort targets by molecule count

SymbolMoleculesMax phase
LRIF100

Bioactivity and enzyme data

Enzyme cohort genes (≥1 EC): 0.

Pharmacogenomics

Cohort genes with a PharmGKB record: 1; with CPIC/DPWG dosing guidelines: 0.

No cohort gene has a CPIC/DPWG genotype-guided dosing guideline (PharmGKB).

Chemical tractability of cohort targets

0 approved/phased compounds have measured bioactivity against a cohort gene (and aren’t yet in disease-level trials). This is a research / tractability signal, NOT a therapeutic recommendation — a bioactivity row often reflects off-target or screening binding (e.g. promiscuous kinase inhibitors against a cohort kinase), implying no disease mechanism.

Druggability pyramid

Cohort genes binned by druggability tier (high → low):

TierDefinitionGenesSymbols
AApproved (phase 4 drug)0
BPhased (≥1) drug, not yet approved0
CDruggable family + PDB, no drug0
DDruggable family + AlphaFold only, no drug0
EDifficult family or no structure, no drug1LRIF1

Undrugged target profiles

1 cohort genes are undrugged. Ranked by ‘starting-point quality’ (assay depth + drugged-partner adjacency).

SymbolChEMBL assaysDrugged partners (top 3)
LRIF10

Clinical trials & evidence

Clinical trials

Clinical trials: 0.