Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 4, digenic

disease
On this page

Also known as facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 4, digenic, digenic dominantFSHD4

Summary

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 4, digenic (MONDO:0030355) is a disease with 1 cohort gene.

At a glance

  • Cohort genes: 1
  • ClinVar variants: 11

Clinical features

No curated clinical features (Orphanet) for this disease.

Identifiers

Disease identifiers

FieldValue
Canonical namefacioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 4, digenic
Mondo IDMONDO:0030355
OMIM619478
DOIDDOID:0060918
UMLSC5561960
MedGen1794170
GARD0025549
Is cancer (heuristic)no

Also known as: facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 4, digenic · facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 4, digenic, digenic dominant · FSHD4

Data availability: 11 ClinVar variants.

Disease family

Classification path: disease › human disease › disease by body system or component › musculoskeletal system disordermuscle tissue disorderskeletal muscle disordermyopathymuscular dystrophyprogressive muscular dystrophyfacioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophyfacioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 4, digenic

Related subtypes (4): facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 1, facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 2, muscular dystrophy, scapulohumeral, facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 3, digenic

Genetics & variants

GWAS landscape

No GWAS associations recorded — common-variant (GWAS) studies don’t cover this disease (typical for Mendelian / rare diseases). See the curated gene cohort and Mendelian overlap below.

Variant details and genetic-evidence tiers

ClinVar germline variants

11 retrieved; paginated sample, class counts are floors:

5 conflicting classifications of pathogenicity, 4 uncertain significance, 1 pathogenic, 1 pathogenic/likely pathogenic

ClinVarVariant (HGVS)GeneClassificationReview
1202608NM_006892.4(DNMT3B):c.1579T>C (p.Cys527Arg)DNMT3BPathogenicno assertion criteria provided
6740NM_006892.4(DNMT3B):c.1807G>A (p.Ala603Thr)DNMT3BPathogenic/Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
3336375NM_006892.4(DNMT3B):c.2162T>C (p.Ile721Thr)DNMT3BConflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
338164NM_006892.4(DNMT3B):c.1219G>A (p.Gly407Ser)DNMT3BConflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
423264NM_006892.4(DNMT3B):c.886G>A (p.Val296Ile)DNMT3BConflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
530707NM_006892.4(DNMT3B):c.608C>T (p.Pro203Leu)DNMT3BConflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
626095NM_006892.4(DNMT3B):c.1490+8C>GDNMT3BConflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
2500020NM_006892.4(DNMT3B):c.1543G>A (p.Glu515Lys)DNMT3BUncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
640978NM_006892.4(DNMT3B):c.2072C>T (p.Pro691Leu)DNMT3BUncertain significancecriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
655698NM_006892.4(DNMT3B):c.1882G>A (p.Val628Met)DNMT3BUncertain significancecriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
656244NM_006892.4(DNMT3B):c.1421A>G (p.Tyr474Cys)DNMT3BUncertain significancecriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Genes & proteins

Mendelian disease overlap and somatic drivers

GenCC: 0 · Orphanet: 2 · OMIM-shared: 0 · Dual-evidence (GWAS+Mendelian): 0

Orphanet rare-disease linkage (cohort genes)

GeneOrphanet IDRare disease
DNMT3BOrphanet:2268ICF syndrome
DNMT3BOrphanet:269Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy

Cohort genes → proteins

1 cohort genes, 1 distinct canonical proteins.

Evidence partition

SubsetGenes
multi_evidence1

Cohort genes (full)

SymbolHGNCEnsemblUniProtNameEvidence
DNMT3BHGNC:2979ENSG00000088305Q9UBC3DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 3Bclinvar

Cohort function summary

Lead sentence per gene, UniProt-curated.

SymbolProtein nameFunction (lead sentence)
DNMT3BDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 3BRequired for genome-wide de novo methylation and is essential for the establishment of DNA methylation patterns during development.

Protein-family classification

Druggable: 0 · Difficult: 1 · Unknown: 0 · Druggable fraction: 0.0

Family distribution

Cohort families vs a genome-wide background (hypergeometric, BH-FDR; fold = observed/expected). Counts kept; sorted by enrichment, so the catch-all Other/Unknown bucket no longer leads.

FamilyGenesFoldFDR
Transcription factor18.3×0.121

Per-gene assignment

SymbolFamilyDruggable?ECInterPro (top 3)
DNMT3BTranscription factorno2.1.1.37PWWP_dom, C5_MeTfrase, Znf_FYVE_PHD

Expression context

Cohort genes with no expression data: 0.

1 cohort gene are a single-cell marker in ≥1 SCXA experiment.

Breadth distribution (Bgee present_calls)

BucketGenes
narrow (1-5 tissues)0
moderate (6-20)0
broad (>20)1
unknown0

Top tissues across cohort

TissueCohort genes
hair follicle1
oocyte1
secondary oocyte1

Per-gene tissue summary (top 30)

SymbolBgee breadthFANTOM5 breadthSCXATop tissues
DNMT3B184ubiquitousmarkersecondary oocyte, oocyte, hair follicle

Protein interactions among cohort

Intra-cohort edges: 0.

Hub genes (top 10 by interactor count)

SymbolInteractor count
DNMT3B4,378

Structural data

PDB: 1 · AlphaFold-only: 0 · No structure: 0

Cohort genes with PDB structures (top 30)

SymbolUniProtPDB entries
DNMT3BQ9UBC347

Function

Pathway analysis

Distinct Reactome pathways touched by cohort: 5. Enrichment computed across 1 evidence-associated genes (1 with Reactome annotation).

Pathways by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 1 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

PathwayCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
SUMOylation of DNA methylation proteins1671.8×0.007DNMT3B
DNA methylation1178.4×0.008DNMT3B
Defective pyroptosis1156.4×0.008DNMT3B
PRC2 methylates histones and DNA1152.3×0.008DNMT3B
NoRC negatively regulates rRNA expression1104.8×0.010DNMT3B

GO biological processes by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 1 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

GO termCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
methylation1170.2×0.018DNMT3B
positive regulation of gene expression138.7×0.039DNMT3B
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II117.7×0.056DNMT3B

Therapeutics

Drug target analysis

Approved (phase 4): 0 · Phase ≥3: 0 · Phased (≥1): 1 · Undrugged: 0

Druggability breadth: 1 of 1 evidence-associated genes (100%) have a ChEMBL target (buckets above are over the deeply-mined display cohort).

Top cohort targets by molecule count

SymbolMoleculesMax phase
DNMT3B12

Drugs targeting cohort genes (top 30)

MoleculeMax phaseTargets in cohort
NANAFROCIN2DNMT3B

Bioactivity and enzyme data

Enzyme cohort genes (≥1 EC): 1.

Cohort genes with ChEMBL bioactivity (full, sorted by assay count)

SymbolAssaysType breakdown
DNMT3B76Binding:75, Functional:1

Cohort enzymes (BRENDA EC)

SymbolEC numbersNames
DNMT3B2.1.1.37DNA (cytosine-5-)-methyltransferase

Pharmacogenomics

Cohort genes with a PharmGKB record: 1; with CPIC/DPWG dosing guidelines: 0.

No cohort gene has a CPIC/DPWG genotype-guided dosing guideline (PharmGKB).

Chemical tractability of cohort targets

1 approved/phased compounds have measured bioactivity against a cohort gene (and aren’t yet in disease-level trials). This is a research / tractability signal, NOT a therapeutic recommendation — a bioactivity row often reflects off-target or screening binding (e.g. promiscuous kinase inhibitors against a cohort kinase), implying no disease mechanism.

CompoundMax phaseCohort target (bioactivity)
NANAFROCIN2DNMT3B

Druggability pyramid

Cohort genes binned by druggability tier (high → low):

TierDefinitionGenesSymbols
AApproved (phase 4 drug)0
BPhased (≥1) drug, not yet approved1DNMT3B
CDruggable family + PDB, no drug0
DDruggable family + AlphaFold only, no drug0
EDifficult family or no structure, no drug0

Undrugged target profiles

0 cohort genes are undrugged. Ranked by ‘starting-point quality’ (assay depth + drugged-partner adjacency).

Clinical trials & evidence

Clinical trials

Clinical trials: 0.