Infant-type hemispheric glioma

disease
On this page

Summary

Infant-type hemispheric glioma (MONDO:0858940) is a cancer with 2 cohort genes (1 CIViC-evidence somatic driver; 2 ClinVar predisposition records) and 1 clinical trial. Top therapeutic interventions include lorlatinib.

At a glance

  • Classification: Cancer
  • Cohort genes: 2
  • ClinVar variants: 2
  • Clinical trials: 1

Clinical features

No curated clinical features (Orphanet) for this disease.

Identifiers

Disease identifiers

FieldValue
Canonical nameinfant-type hemispheric glioma
Mondo IDMONDO:0858940
Orphanet695136
DOIDDOID:0081278
NCITC185471
UMLSC5669919
MedGen1806401
GARD0026636
Is cancer (heuristic)yes

Data availability: 2 ClinVar variants.

Disease family

Classification path: disease › human disease › disease by etiologic mechanism › cancer or benign tumorneoplastic disease or syndromeneoplasmnervous system neoplasmneuroepithelial neoplasmgliomaastrocytic tumorinfant-type hemispheric glioma

Related subtypes (7): adult astrocytic tumor, childhood astrocytic tumor, gliofibroma, high grade astrocytic tumor, astrocytoma (excluding glioblastoma), low grade astrocytic tumor, anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma

Genetics & variants

GWAS landscape

No GWAS associations recorded — common-variant (GWAS) studies don’t cover this disease (typical for Mendelian / rare diseases). See the curated gene cohort and Mendelian overlap below.

Variant details and genetic-evidence tiers

ClinVar germline variants

2 retrieved; paginated sample, class counts are floors:

1 pathogenic/likely pathogenic, 1 pathogenic

ClinVarVariant (HGVS)GeneClassificationReview
55656NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.65T>C (p.Leu22Ser)BRCA1Pathogenicreviewed by expert panel
5294NM_001048174.2(MUTYH):c.1103G>A (p.Gly368Asp)MUTYHPathogenic/Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Genes & proteins

Mendelian disease overlap and somatic drivers

GenCC: 0 · Orphanet: 11 · OMIM-shared: 0 · Dual-evidence (GWAS+Mendelian): 0

Somatic driver evidence (intOGen + CIViC, cohort fanout)

GeneintOGen roleCancer typesCIViC
BRCA1LoFBLCA,BRCA,MEL,OVTCIViC #6

Orphanet rare-disease linkage (cohort genes)

GeneOrphanet IDRare disease
BRCA1Orphanet:1331Familial prostate cancer
BRCA1Orphanet:1333Familial pancreatic carcinoma
BRCA1Orphanet:145Hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer syndrome
BRCA1Orphanet:168829Primary peritoneal carcinoma
BRCA1Orphanet:227535Hereditary breast cancer
BRCA1Orphanet:667662Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma
BRCA1Orphanet:694963Inflammatory breast cancer
BRCA1Orphanet:70567Cholangiocarcinoma
BRCA1Orphanet:84Fanconi anemia
MUTYHOrphanet:247798MUTYH-related polyposis
MUTYHOrphanet:440437Familial colorectal cancer Type X

Cohort genes → proteins

2 cohort genes, 2 distinct canonical proteins.

Evidence partition

SubsetGenes
multi_evidence2

Cohort genes (full)

SymbolHGNCEnsemblUniProtNameEvidence
BRCA1HGNC:1100ENSG00000012048P38398Breast cancer type 1 susceptibility proteinclinvar
MUTYHHGNC:7527ENSG00000132781Q9UIF7Adenine DNA glycosylaseclinvar

Cohort function summary

Lead sentence per gene, UniProt-curated.

SymbolProtein nameFunction (lead sentence)
BRCA1Breast cancer type 1 susceptibility proteinE3 ubiquitin-protein ligase that specifically mediates the formation of ‘Lys-6’-linked polyubiquitin chains and plays a central role in DNA repair by facilitating cellular responses to DNA damage.
MUTYHAdenine DNA glycosylaseInvolved in oxidative DNA damage repair.

Protein-family classification

Druggable: 0 · Difficult: 1 · Unknown: 1 · Druggable fraction: 0.0

Family distribution

Cohort families vs a genome-wide background (hypergeometric, BH-FDR; fold = observed/expected). Counts kept; sorted by enrichment, so the catch-all Other/Unknown bucket no longer leads.

FamilyGenesFoldFDR
Transcription factor14.1×0.455
Other/Unknown10.9×0.805

Per-gene assignment

SymbolFamilyDruggable?ECInterPro (top 3)
BRCA1Transcription factorno2.3.2.27BRCT_dom, Znf_RING, BRCA1
MUTYHOther/UnknownnoNUDIX_hydrolase_dom, HhH_motif, HhH-GPD_domain

Expression context

Cohort genes with no expression data: 0.

2 cohort genes are a single-cell marker in ≥1 SCXA experiment.

Breadth distribution (Bgee present_calls)

BucketGenes
narrow (1-5 tissues)0
moderate (6-20)0
broad (>20)2
unknown0

Top tissues across cohort

TissueCohort genes
male germ line stem cell (sensu Vertebrata) in testis1
primordial germ cell in gonad1
ventricular zone1
cerebellar cortex1
cerebellar hemisphere1
right hemisphere of cerebellum1

Per-gene tissue summary (top 30)

SymbolBgee breadthFANTOM5 breadthSCXATop tissues
BRCA1208ubiquitousmarkerventricular zone, male germ line stem cell (sensu Vertebrata) in testis, primordial germ cell in gonad
MUTYH134ubiquitousmarkercerebellar hemisphere, cerebellar cortex, right hemisphere of cerebellum

Protein interactions among cohort

Intra-cohort edges: 0.

Hub genes (top 10 by interactor count)

SymbolInteractor count
BRCA19,064
MUTYH1,815

Structural data

PDB: 2 · AlphaFold-only: 0 · No structure: 0

Cohort genes with PDB structures (top 30)

SymbolUniProtPDB entries
BRCA1P3839833
MUTYHQ9UIF73

Function

Pathway analysis

Distinct Reactome pathways touched by cohort: 64. Enrichment computed across 2 evidence-associated genes (2 with Reactome annotation).

Pathways by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 2 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

PathwayCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
Defective MUTYH substrate binding15710.0×0.006MUTYH
Defective MUTYH substrate processing15710.0×0.006MUTYH
Defective DNA double strand break response due to BRCA1 loss of function12855.0×0.006BRCA1
Defective DNA double strand break response due to BARD1 loss of function12855.0×0.006BRCA1
Regulation of MITF-M-dependent genes involved in DNA replication, damage repair and senescence1815.7×0.016BRCA1
Displacement of DNA glycosylase by APEX11519.1×0.017MUTYH
Defective homologous recombination repair (HRR) due to PALB2 loss of function1475.8×0.017BRCA1
Diseases of DNA Double-Strand Break Repair1407.9×0.017BRCA1
Defective homologous recombination repair (HRR) due to BRCA2 loss of function1407.9×0.017BRCA1
Resolution of D-Loop Structures1317.2×0.017BRCA1
Diseases of DNA repair1285.5×0.017BRCA1
DNA Double Strand Break Response1237.9×0.017BRCA1
Impaired BRCA2 binding to PALB21228.4×0.017BRCA1
Defective homologous recombination repair (HRR) due to BRCA1 loss of function1211.5×0.017BRCA1
Defective HDR through Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) due to PALB2 loss of BRCA1 binding function1211.5×0.017BRCA1
Defective HDR through Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) due to PALB2 loss of BRCA2/RAD51/RAD51C binding function1211.5×0.017BRCA1
Resolution of D-loop Structures through Synthesis-Dependent Strand Annealing (SDSA)1196.9×0.017BRCA1
Homologous DNA Pairing and Strand Exchange1190.3×0.017BRCA1
Homology Directed Repair1154.3×0.017BRCA1
HDR through Homologous Recombination (HRR) or Single Strand Annealing (SSA)1154.3×0.017BRCA1
Impaired BRCA2 binding to RAD511154.3×0.017BRCA1
Metalloprotease DUBs1150.3×0.017BRCA1
Resolution of D-loop Structures through Holliday Junction Intermediates1150.3×0.017BRCA1
HDR through Single Strand Annealing (SSA)1146.4×0.017BRCA1
Transcriptional Regulation by E2F61146.4×0.017BRCA1
Meiosis1142.8×0.017BRCA1
Presynaptic phase of homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange1135.9×0.017BRCA1
DNA Double-Strand Break Repair1124.1×0.018BRCA1
Recognition and association of DNA glycosylase with site containing an affected purine1102.0×0.020MUTYH
Cleavage of the damaged purine1102.0×0.020MUTYH

GO biological processes by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 2 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

GO termCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
depurination12106.5×0.006MUTYH
cellular response to indole-3-methanol11685.2×0.006BRCA1
chordate embryonic development11404.3×0.006BRCA1
negative regulation of centriole replication11203.7×0.006BRCA1
DNA strand resection involved in replication fork processing11053.2×0.006BRCA1
DNA damage tolerance1842.6×0.006BRCA1
homologous recombination1702.2×0.006BRCA1
negative regulation of intracellular estrogen receptor signaling pathway1561.7×0.006BRCA1
regulation of DNA damage checkpoint1561.7×0.006BRCA1
negative regulation of gene expression via chromosomal CpG island methylation1526.6×0.006BRCA1
negative regulation of necroptotic process1495.6×0.006MUTYH
protein K6-linked ubiquitination1495.6×0.006BRCA1
random inactivation of X chromosome1468.1×0.006BRCA1
negative regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic process1468.1×0.006BRCA1
negative regulation of fatty acid biosynthetic process1443.5×0.006BRCA1
DNA repair263.8×0.006BRCA1, MUTYH
mitotic G2/M transition checkpoint1401.2×0.007BRCA1
mismatch repair1324.1×0.008MUTYH
negative regulation of extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway via death domain receptors1290.6×0.008BRCA1
positive regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor production1247.8×0.009BRCA1
base-excision repair1234.1×0.009MUTYH
mitotic G2 DNA damage checkpoint signaling1221.7×0.009BRCA1
response to ionizing radiation1205.5×0.009BRCA1
cellular response to ionizing radiation1205.5×0.009BRCA1
positive regulation of DNA repair1179.3×0.010BRCA1
fatty acid biosynthetic process1175.5×0.010BRCA1
centrosome cycle1168.5×0.010BRCA1
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage1162.0×0.010BRCA1
negative regulation of cell cycle1145.3×0.011BRCA1
regulation of DNA repair1138.1×0.011BRCA1

Therapeutics

Drug target analysis

Approved (phase 4): 1 · Phase ≥3: 1 · Phased (≥1): 1 · Undrugged: 1

Druggability breadth: 2 of 2 evidence-associated genes (100%) have a ChEMBL target (buckets above are over the deeply-mined display cohort).

Genes with an approved drug

The molecule shown is one approved compound that hits the gene — not necessarily a drug of choice or one indicated for this disease.

SymbolExample approved molecule
BRCA1RIBOFLAVIN

Top cohort targets by molecule count

SymbolMoleculesMax phase
BRCA1124
MUTYH00

Drugs targeting cohort genes (top 30)

MoleculeMax phaseTargets in cohort
RIBOFLAVIN4BRCA1
DAUNORUBICIN HYDROCHLORIDE4BRCA1
TOPOTECAN HYDROCHLORIDE4BRCA1
DAUNORUBICIN4BRCA1
DOXORUBICIN HYDROCHLORIDE4BRCA1
MESALAMINE4BRCA1
DIPYRIDAMOLE4BRCA1
CURCUMIN3BRCA1
SURAMIN3BRCA1
SURAMIN HEXASODIUM3BRCA1
SODIUM TANSHINONE IIA SULFONATE2BRCA1
HOMIDIUM BROMIDE2BRCA1

Bioactivity and enzyme data

Enzyme cohort genes (≥1 EC): 1.

Cohort genes with ChEMBL bioactivity (full, sorted by assay count)

SymbolAssaysType breakdown
BRCA113Binding:9, Functional:4
MUTYH1Functional:1

Cohort enzymes (BRENDA EC)

SymbolEC numbersNames
BRCA12.3.2.27RING-type E3 ubiquitin transferase

Pharmacogenomics

Cohort genes with a PharmGKB record: 2; with CPIC/DPWG dosing guidelines: 0.

No cohort gene has a CPIC/DPWG genotype-guided dosing guideline (PharmGKB).

Drug repurposing candidates

12 approved/phased drugs hit cohort targets but don’t yet appear in disease-level clinical trials. Target-inhibition rationale is strongest for cancer driver genes; a bioactivity hit is a screening signal, not a treatment claim.

CompoundMax phaseCohort target (bioactivity)
RIBOFLAVIN4BRCA1
DAUNORUBICIN HYDROCHLORIDE4BRCA1
TOPOTECAN HYDROCHLORIDE4BRCA1
DAUNORUBICIN4BRCA1
DOXORUBICIN HYDROCHLORIDE4BRCA1
MESALAMINE4BRCA1
DIPYRIDAMOLE4BRCA1
CURCUMIN3BRCA1
SURAMIN3BRCA1
SURAMIN HEXASODIUM3BRCA1
SODIUM TANSHINONE IIA SULFONATE2BRCA1
HOMIDIUM BROMIDE2BRCA1

Druggability pyramid

Cohort genes binned by druggability tier (high → low):

TierDefinitionGenesSymbols
AApproved (phase 4 drug)1BRCA1
BPhased (≥1) drug, not yet approved0
CDruggable family + PDB, no drug0
DDruggable family + AlphaFold only, no drug0
EDifficult family or no structure, no drug1MUTYH

Undrugged target profiles

1 cohort genes are undrugged. Ranked by ‘starting-point quality’ (assay depth + drugged-partner adjacency).

SymbolChEMBL assaysDrugged partners (top 3)
MUTYH1

Clinical trials & evidence

Clinical trials

Clinical trials: 1.

Phase distribution (across all retrieved trials)

PhaseTrials
EARLY_PHASE11

Top trials by phase / activity

NCTPhaseStatusTitle
NCT06333899EARLY_PHASE1RECRUITINGLorlatinib for Newly-Diagnosed High-Grade Glioma With ROS or ALK Fusion

Drugs tested across these trials (top 30)

MoleculeMax phaseTrials referencing
LORLATINIB41
CHEMBL430315501
CHEMBL443640601
CHEMBL528923501