mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 10

disease
On this page

Also known as MC1DN10

Summary

mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 10 (MONDO:0032616) is a disease caused by NDUFAF2 (GenCC Strong), with 2 cohort genes.

At a glance

  • Causal gene: NDUFAF2 (GenCC Strong)
  • Cohort genes: 2
  • ClinVar variants: 22

Clinical features

No curated clinical features (Orphanet) for this disease.

Identifiers

Disease identifiers

FieldValue
Canonical namemitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 10
Mondo IDMONDO:0032616
OMIM618233
DOIDDOID:0112075
UMLSC4748768
MedGen1648426
GARD0016320
Is cancer (heuristic)no

Also known as: MC1DN10

Data availability: 22 ClinVar variants · 3 GenCC gene-disease records.

Disease family

Classification path: disease › human disease › disease by developmental or physiological process › metabolic diseasedevelopmental anomaly of metabolic origininborn mitochondrial metabolism disordermitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation disordermitochondrial respiratory chain complex deficiencymitochondrial complex I deficiencymitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear typemitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 10

Related subtypes (36): mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 12, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 30, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, autosomal recessive, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 36, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 37, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 2, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 3, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 4, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 5, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 6, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 7, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 8, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 9, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 11, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 13, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 14, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 15, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 16, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 17, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 18, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 19, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 21, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 22, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 23, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 24, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 25, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 26, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 27, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 28, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 29, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 31, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 32, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 33, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 34, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 1, mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 39

Genetics & variants

GWAS landscape

No GWAS associations recorded — common-variant (GWAS) studies don’t cover this disease (typical for Mendelian / rare diseases). See the curated gene cohort and Mendelian overlap below.

Variant details and genetic-evidence tiers

ClinVar germline variants

22 retrieved; paginated sample, class counts are floors:

6 likely pathogenic, 4 pathogenic, 4 pathogenic/likely pathogenic, 4 uncertain significance, 2 benign, 1 benign/likely benign, 1 conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

ClinVarVariant (HGVS)GeneClassificationReview
419231NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.114C>G (p.Tyr38Ter)ERCC8Pathogeniccriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
1323336NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.184del (p.Tyr62fs)NDUFAF2Pathogeniccriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
1594NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.139C>T (p.Arg47Ter)NDUFAF2Pathogenic/Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
1595NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.103del (p.Ile35fs)NDUFAF2Pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
2885898NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.119dup (p.Asn40fs)NDUFAF2Pathogenic/Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
496555NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.221G>A (p.Trp74Ter)NDUFAF2Pathogenic/Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
496596NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.1A>T (p.Met1Leu)NDUFAF2Pathogenic/Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
496598NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.9G>A (p.Trp3Ter)NDUFAF2Pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
558212NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.13C>T (p.Gln5Ter)ERCC8Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
3592732NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.167del (p.Asn56fs)NDUFAF2Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
3592733NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.265_268del (p.Leu89fs)NDUFAF2Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
3592734NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.289G>T (p.Glu97Ter)NDUFAF2Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
3592735NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.304del (p.Ser102fs)NDUFAF2Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
3592737NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.330dup (p.Leu111fs)NDUFAF2Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
2890272NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.36G>A (p.Trp12Ter)NDUFAF2Conflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
2434085NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.263T>C (p.Ile88Thr)NDUFAF2Uncertain significancecriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
2637644NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.282_283del (p.His94fs)NDUFAF2Uncertain significancecriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
2689551NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.50G>A (p.Arg17Lys)NDUFAF2Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
3393376NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.76G>C (p.Asp26His)NDUFAF2Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
129691NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.60G>A (p.Lys20=)NDUFAF2Benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
138457NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.462T>C (p.Phe154=)NDUFAF2Benign/Likely benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
671559NM_174889.5(NDUFAF2):c.217+42A>GNDUFAF2Benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Genes & proteins

Mendelian disease overlap and somatic drivers

GenCC: 6 · Orphanet: 5 · OMIM-shared: 0 · Dual-evidence (GWAS+Mendelian): 0

GenCC gene–disease validity (cohort genes)

the Disease column is the GenCC-asserted condition — a cohort gene’s strongest validity may be for a related predisposition syndrome.

GeneClassificationInheritanceDiseaseRecords
NDUFAF2StrongAutosomal recessivemitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 106

Orphanet rare-disease linkage (cohort genes)

GeneOrphanet IDRare disease
NDUFAF2Orphanet:2609Isolated complex I deficiency
ERCC8Orphanet:178338UV-sensitive syndrome
ERCC8Orphanet:90321Cockayne syndrome type 1
ERCC8Orphanet:90322Cockayne syndrome type 2
ERCC8Orphanet:90324Cockayne syndrome type 3

Cohort genes → proteins

2 cohort genes, 2 distinct canonical proteins.

Evidence partition

SubsetGenes
multi_evidence2

Cohort genes (full)

SymbolHGNCEnsemblUniProtNameEvidence
NDUFAF2HGNC:28086ENSG00000164182Q8N183NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 alpha subcomplex assembly factor 2gencc,clinvar
ERCC8HGNC:3439ENSG00000049167Q13216DNA excision repair protein ERCC-8clinvar

Cohort function summary

Lead sentence per gene, UniProt-curated.

SymbolProtein nameFunction (lead sentence)
NDUFAF2NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 alpha subcomplex assembly factor 2Acts as a molecular chaperone for mitochondrial complex I assembly.
ERCC8DNA excision repair protein ERCC-8Substrate-recognition component of the CSA complex, a DCX (DDB1-CUL4-X-box) E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase complex, involved in transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair (TC-NER), a process during which RNA polymerase II-blocking lesio…

Protein-family classification

Druggable: 0 · Difficult: 1 · Unknown: 1 · Druggable fraction: 0.0

Family distribution

Cohort families vs a genome-wide background (hypergeometric, BH-FDR; fold = observed/expected). Counts kept; sorted by enrichment, so the catch-all Other/Unknown bucket no longer leads.

FamilyGenesFoldFDR
Scaffold/PPI18.6×0.225
Other/Unknown10.9×0.805

Per-gene assignment

SymbolFamilyDruggable?ECInterPro (top 3)
NDUFAF2Other/UnknownnoNDUFA12, ComplexI_NDUFA12
ERCC8Scaffold/PPInoWD40_rpt, WD40/YVTN_repeat-like_dom_sf, WD40_repeat_CS

Expression context

Cohort genes with no expression data: 0.

1 cohort gene are a single-cell marker in ≥1 SCXA experiment.

Breadth distribution (Bgee present_calls)

BucketGenes
narrow (1-5 tissues)0
moderate (6-20)0
broad (>20)2
unknown0

Top tissues across cohort

TissueCohort genes
calcaneal tendon1
gastrocnemius1
lower esophagus muscularis layer1
adrenal tissue1
primordial germ cell in gonad1
ventricular zone1

Per-gene tissue summary (top 30)

SymbolBgee breadthFANTOM5 breadthSCXATop tissues
NDUFAF2139ubiquitousmarkercalcaneal tendon, lower esophagus muscularis layer, gastrocnemius
ERCC8218ubiquitousyesadrenal tissue, ventricular zone, primordial germ cell in gonad

Protein interactions among cohort

Intra-cohort edges: 0.

Hub genes (top 10 by interactor count)

SymbolInteractor count
NDUFAF21,633
ERCC81,550

Structural data

PDB: 1 · AlphaFold-only: 1 · No structure: 0

Cohort genes with PDB structures (top 30)

SymbolUniProtPDB entries
ERCC8Q1321616

AlphaFold-only cohort genes (top 30 by pLDDT)

SymbolUniProtpLDDT
NDUFAF2Q8N18378.98

Function

Pathway analysis

Distinct Reactome pathways touched by cohort: 9. Enrichment computed across 2 evidence-associated genes (2 with Reactome annotation).

Pathways by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 2 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

PathwayCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
Transcription-Coupled Nucleotide Excision Repair (TC-NER)1132.8×0.022ERCC8
Formation of TC-NER Pre-Incision Complex1105.7×0.022ERCC8
Gap-filling DNA repair synthesis and ligation in TC-NER189.2×0.022ERCC8
Dual incision in TC-NER186.5×0.022ERCC8
Complex I biogenesis182.8×0.022NDUFAF2
Respiratory electron transport147.6×0.029NDUFAF2
Aerobic respiration and respiratory electron transport144.3×0.029NDUFAF2
Neddylation123.7×0.047ERCC8
Metabolism15.8×0.165NDUFAF2

GO biological processes by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 2 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

GO termCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
regulation of transcription-coupled nucleotide-excision repair18426.0×0.002ERCC8
negative regulation of insulin secretion involved in cellular response to glucose stimulus1842.6×0.006NDUFAF2
double-strand break repair via classical nonhomologous end joining1842.6×0.006ERCC8
single strand break repair1702.2×0.006ERCC8
transcription-coupled nucleotide-excision repair1601.9×0.006ERCC8
response to X-ray1443.5×0.006ERCC8
response to auditory stimulus1366.4×0.007ERCC8
mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I assembly1205.5×0.009NDUFAF2
response to UV1183.2×0.009ERCC8
positive regulation of DNA repair1179.3×0.009ERCC8
protein autoubiquitination1117.0×0.013ERCC8
response to oxidative stress165.3×0.022ERCC8
protein polyubiquitination157.7×0.023ERCC8
cilium assembly136.8×0.033NDUFAF2
DNA damage response126.8×0.040ERCC8
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process126.1×0.040ERCC8
protein ubiquitination120.7×0.048ERCC8

Therapeutics

Drug target analysis

Approved (phase 4): 0 · Phase ≥3: 0 · Phased (≥1): 0 · Undrugged: 2

Druggability breadth: 1 of 2 evidence-associated genes (50%) have a ChEMBL target (buckets above are over the deeply-mined display cohort).

Top cohort targets by molecule count

SymbolMoleculesMax phase
NDUFAF200
ERCC800

Bioactivity and enzyme data

Enzyme cohort genes (≥1 EC): 0.

Cohort genes with ChEMBL bioactivity (full, sorted by assay count)

SymbolAssaysType breakdown
NDUFAF25Binding:5

Pharmacogenomics

Cohort genes with a PharmGKB record: 2; with CPIC/DPWG dosing guidelines: 0.

No cohort gene has a CPIC/DPWG genotype-guided dosing guideline (PharmGKB).

Chemical tractability of cohort targets

0 approved/phased compounds have measured bioactivity against a cohort gene (and aren’t yet in disease-level trials). This is a research / tractability signal, NOT a therapeutic recommendation — a bioactivity row often reflects off-target or screening binding (e.g. promiscuous kinase inhibitors against a cohort kinase), implying no disease mechanism.

Druggability pyramid

Cohort genes binned by druggability tier (high → low):

TierDefinitionGenesSymbols
AApproved (phase 4 drug)0
BPhased (≥1) drug, not yet approved0
CDruggable family + PDB, no drug0
DDruggable family + AlphaFold only, no drug0
EDifficult family or no structure, no drug2NDUFAF2, ERCC8

Undrugged target profiles

2 cohort genes are undrugged. Ranked by ‘starting-point quality’ (assay depth + drugged-partner adjacency).

SymbolChEMBL assaysDrugged partners (top 3)
NDUFAF25
ERCC80

Clinical trials & evidence

Clinical trials

Clinical trials: 0.