Orofacial cleft 10

disease
On this page

Also known as OFC10orofacial cleft 10, isolated casesorofacial cleft caused by mutation in SUMO1orofacial cleft type 10SUMO1 orofacial cleft

Summary

Orofacial cleft 10 (MONDO:0013378) is a disease with 2 cohort genes.

At a glance

  • Cohort genes: 2
  • ClinVar variants: 25

Clinical features

No curated clinical features (Orphanet) for this disease.

Identifiers

Disease identifiers

FieldValue
Canonical nameorofacial cleft 10
Mondo IDMONDO:0013378
MeSHC566605
OMIM613705
DOIDDOID:0080403
UMLSC1866070
MedGen355621
GARD0018306
Is cancer (heuristic)no

Also known as: OFC10 · orofacial cleft 10 · orofacial cleft 10, isolated cases · orofacial cleft caused by mutation in SUMO1 · orofacial cleft type 10 · SUMO1 orofacial cleft

Data availability: 25 ClinVar variants · 2 GenCC gene-disease records.

Disease family

Classification path: disease › human disease › disease by etiologic mechanism › disease of genetic or genomic mechanism › hereditary diseaseorofacial cleftcleft lip/palateorofacial cleft 10

Related subtypes (3): orofacial cleft 11, orofacial cleft 5, orofacial cleft 15

Genetics & variants

GWAS landscape

No GWAS associations recorded — common-variant (GWAS) studies don’t cover this disease (typical for Mendelian / rare diseases). See the curated gene cohort and Mendelian overlap below.

Variant details and genetic-evidence tiers

ClinVar germline variants

25 retrieved; paginated sample, class counts are floors:

16 uncertain significance, 6 benign, 2 likely benign, 1 pathogenic

ClinVarVariant (HGVS)GeneClassificationReview
762946,XX,t(2;8)(q33.1;q24.3)SUMO1Pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
559487NM_006147.4(IRF6):c.273A>T (p.Arg91Ser)IRF6Uncertain significanceno assertion criteria provided
559492NM_006147.4(IRF6):c.514C>T (p.Pro172Ser)IRF6Uncertain significanceno assertion criteria provided
559493NM_006147.4(IRF6):c.595G>A (p.Glu199Lys)IRF6Uncertain significanceno assertion criteria provided
559496NM_006147.4(IRF6):c.1175T>G (p.Val392Gly)IRF6Uncertain significanceno assertion criteria provided
333609NM_003352.8(SUMO1):c.*944G>CSUMO1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
333610NM_003352.8(SUMO1):c.*884A>GSUMO1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
333611NM_003352.8(SUMO1):c.*724A>GSUMO1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
333612NM_003352.8(SUMO1):c.*545G>TSUMO1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
333613NM_003352.8(SUMO1):c.*475A>GSUMO1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
895351NM_003352.8(SUMO1):c.*814G>ASUMO1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
895352NM_003352.8(SUMO1):c.*776A>TSUMO1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
895353NM_003352.8(SUMO1):c.*753C>GSUMO1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
895354NM_003352.8(SUMO1):c.88-8C>TSUMO1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
896763NM_003352.8(SUMO1):c.-48C>TSUMO1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
896764NM_003352.8(SUMO1):c.-83A>GSUMO1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
898330NM_003352.8(SUMO1):c.*1038C>TSUMO1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
559488NM_006147.4(IRF6):c.362G>T (p.Gly121Val)IRF6Benignno assertion criteria provided
559489NM_006147.4(IRF6):c.443A>G (p.Asp148Gly)IRF6Benignno assertion criteria provided
559490NM_006147.4(IRF6):c.457T>G (p.Ser153Ala)IRF6Benignno assertion criteria provided
559491NM_006147.4(IRF6):c.490C>G (p.Pro164Ala)IRF6Benignno assertion criteria provided
559494NM_006147.4(IRF6):c.635G>A (p.Ser212Asn)IRF6Benignno assertion criteria provided
559495NM_006147.4(IRF6):c.1173G>T (p.Leu391Phe)IRF6Benignno assertion criteria provided
333615NM_003352.8(SUMO1):c.-32T>GSUMO1Likely benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
896765NM_003352.8(SUMO1):c.-94G>ASUMO1Likely benigncriteria provided, single submitter

Genes & proteins

Mendelian disease overlap and somatic drivers

GenCC: 2 · Orphanet: 8 · OMIM-shared: 0 · Dual-evidence (GWAS+Mendelian): 0

GenCC gene–disease validity (cohort genes)

the Disease column is the GenCC-asserted condition — a cohort gene’s strongest validity may be for a related predisposition syndrome.

GeneClassificationInheritanceDiseaseRecords
SUMO1LimitedUnknownorofacial cleft 102

Orphanet rare-disease linkage (cohort genes)

GeneOrphanet IDRare disease
SUMO1Orphanet:99798Oligodontia
IRF6Orphanet:1300Autosomal dominant popliteal pterygium syndrome
IRF6Orphanet:141291Cleft lip and alveolus
IRF6Orphanet:199302Isolated cleft lip
IRF6Orphanet:199306Cleft lip/palate
IRF6Orphanet:708014Ectodermal dysplasia-natal teeth-skin abscesses-plantar hyperkeratosis-hearing impairment
IRF6Orphanet:888Van der Woude syndrome
IRF6Orphanet:99798Oligodontia

Cohort genes → proteins

2 cohort genes, 2 distinct canonical proteins.

Evidence partition

SubsetGenes
multi_evidence2

Cohort genes (full)

SymbolHGNCEnsemblUniProtNameEvidence
SUMO1HGNC:12502ENSG00000116030P63165Small ubiquitin-related modifier 1gencc,clinvar
IRF6HGNC:6121ENSG00000117595O14896Interferon regulatory factor 6clinvar

Cohort function summary

Lead sentence per gene, UniProt-curated.

SymbolProtein nameFunction (lead sentence)
SUMO1Small ubiquitin-related modifier 1Ubiquitin-like protein that can be covalently attached to proteins as a monomer or a lysine-linked polymer.
IRF6Interferon regulatory factor 6Probable DNA-binding transcriptional activator.

Protein-family classification

Druggable: 0 · Difficult: 0 · Unknown: 2 · Druggable fraction: 0.0

Family distribution

Cohort families vs a genome-wide background (hypergeometric, BH-FDR; fold = observed/expected). Counts kept; sorted by enrichment, so the catch-all Other/Unknown bucket no longer leads.

FamilyGenesFoldFDR
Other/Unknown21.8×0.312

Per-gene assignment

SymbolFamilyDruggable?ECInterPro (top 3)
SUMO1Other/UnknownnoUbiquitin-like_dom, Rad60/SUMO-like_dom, Ubiquitin-like_domsf
IRF6Other/UnknownnoInterferon_reg_fact_DNA-bd_dom, SMAD_FHA_dom_sf, SMAD-like_dom_sf

Expression context

Cohort genes with no expression data: 0.

2 cohort genes are a single-cell marker in ≥1 SCXA experiment.

Breadth distribution (Bgee present_calls)

BucketGenes
narrow (1-5 tissues)0
moderate (6-20)0
broad (>20)2
unknown0

Top tissues across cohort

TissueCohort genes
cortical plate1
ganglionic eminence1
ventricular zone1
esophagus squamous epithelium1
secondary oocyte1
upper leg skin1

Per-gene tissue summary (top 30)

SymbolBgee breadthFANTOM5 breadthSCXATop tissues
SUMO1266ubiquitousmarkerganglionic eminence, cortical plate, ventricular zone
IRF6228broadmarkersecondary oocyte, upper leg skin, esophagus squamous epithelium

Protein interactions among cohort

Intra-cohort edges: 0.

Hub genes (top 10 by interactor count)

SymbolInteractor count
IRF61,897
SUMO1981

Structural data

PDB: 1 · AlphaFold-only: 1 · No structure: 0

Cohort genes with PDB structures (top 30)

SymbolUniProtPDB entries
SUMO1P6316568

AlphaFold-only cohort genes (top 30 by pLDDT)

SymbolUniProtpLDDT
IRF6O1489674.19

Function

Pathway analysis

Distinct Reactome pathways touched by cohort: 63. Enrichment computed across 2 evidence-associated genes (2 with Reactome annotation).

Pathways by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 2 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

PathwayCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
Interferon gamma signaling2125.5×0.002SUMO1, IRF6
Interferon Signaling2120.2×0.002SUMO1, IRF6
SUMOylation of nuclear envelope proteins11903.3×0.009SUMO1
Cytokine Signaling in Immune system240.8×0.009SUMO1, IRF6
SUMO is conjugated to E1 (UBA2:SAE1)11142.0×0.011SUMO1
SUMO is proteolytically processed1951.7×0.011SUMO1
SUMO is transferred from E1 to E2 (UBE2I, UBC9)1815.7×0.011SUMO1
Processing and activation of SUMO1634.4×0.012SUMO1
Negative regulation of activity of TFAP2 (AP-2) family transcription factors1571.0×0.012SUMO1
Maturation of nucleoprotein1519.1×0.012SUMO1
SUMOylation of immune response proteins1475.8×0.012SUMO1
Translation of Structural Proteins1439.2×0.012SUMO1
Regulation of IFNG signaling1407.9×0.012SUMO1
Maturation of nucleoprotein1380.7×0.012SUMO1
SUMOylation of DNA methylation proteins1335.9×0.012SUMO1
Transcriptional regulation by the AP-2 (TFAP2) family of transcription factors1317.2×0.012SUMO1
SUMOylation of transcription factors1285.5×0.013SUMO1
DNA Double Strand Break Response1237.9×0.015SUMO1
Global Genome Nucleotide Excision Repair (GG-NER)1228.4×0.015SUMO1
Postmitotic nuclear pore complex (NPC) reformation1203.9×0.015SUMO1
Translation of Structural Proteins1203.9×0.015SUMO1
SUMOylation of intracellular receptors1167.9×0.016SUMO1
SUMOylation of SUMOylation proteins1163.1×0.016SUMO1
Nuclear Envelope (NE) Reassembly1146.4×0.016SUMO1
SUMOylation of ubiquitinylation proteins1146.4×0.016SUMO1
Late SARS-CoV-2 Infection Events1146.4×0.016SUMO1
Nucleotide Excision Repair1142.8×0.016SUMO1
Immune System213.0×0.016SUMO1, IRF6
Formation of Incision Complex in GG-NER1126.9×0.016SUMO1
SUMOylation of DNA replication proteins1124.1×0.016SUMO1

GO biological processes by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 2 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

GO termCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
roof of mouth development2247.8×5e-04SUMO1, IRF6
protein localization to nuclear pore12808.7×0.005SUMO1
negative regulation of action potential12106.5×0.005SUMO1
negative regulation of transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II11685.2×0.005SUMO1
PML body organization11404.3×0.005SUMO1
regulation of calcium ion transmembrane transport11053.2×0.005SUMO1
mammary gland epithelial cell differentiation1601.9×0.006IRF6
regulation of cardiac muscle cell contraction1561.7×0.006SUMO1
negative regulation of protein import into nucleus1468.1×0.006SUMO1
cranial skeletal system development1468.1×0.006IRF6
cell development1443.5×0.006IRF6
negative regulation of stem cell proliferation1421.3×0.006IRF6
cellular response to cadmium ion1383.0×0.006SUMO1
negative regulation of keratinocyte proliferation1351.1×0.007IRF6
keratinocyte proliferation1290.6×0.007IRF6
limb development1205.5×0.010IRF6
immune system process1195.9×0.010IRF6
cellular response to heat1172.0×0.010SUMO1
positive regulation of protein-containing complex assembly1168.5×0.010SUMO1
protein sumoylation1162.0×0.010SUMO1
stem cell proliferation1156.0×0.010IRF6
keratinocyte differentiation1123.9×0.012IRF6
positive regulation of proteasomal ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process1105.3×0.013SUMO1
regulation of protein stability162.9×0.021SUMO1
protein stabilization133.4×0.038SUMO1
DNA repair131.9×0.038SUMO1
negative regulation of cell population proliferation121.1×0.056IRF6
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcription115.8×0.071SUMO1
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcription114.0×0.078IRF6
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II18.9×0.117SUMO1

Therapeutics

Drug target analysis

Approved (phase 4): 0 · Phase ≥3: 0 · Phased (≥1): 0 · Undrugged: 2

Druggability breadth: 1 of 2 evidence-associated genes (50%) have a ChEMBL target (buckets above are over the deeply-mined display cohort).

Top cohort targets by molecule count

SymbolMoleculesMax phase
SUMO100
IRF600

Bioactivity and enzyme data

Enzyme cohort genes (≥1 EC): 0.

Cohort genes with ChEMBL bioactivity (full, sorted by assay count)

SymbolAssaysType breakdown
SUMO113Binding:11, Functional:2

Pharmacogenomics

Cohort genes with a PharmGKB record: 2; with CPIC/DPWG dosing guidelines: 0.

No cohort gene has a CPIC/DPWG genotype-guided dosing guideline (PharmGKB).

Chemical tractability of cohort targets

0 approved/phased compounds have measured bioactivity against a cohort gene (and aren’t yet in disease-level trials). This is a research / tractability signal, NOT a therapeutic recommendation — a bioactivity row often reflects off-target or screening binding (e.g. promiscuous kinase inhibitors against a cohort kinase), implying no disease mechanism.

Druggability pyramid

Cohort genes binned by druggability tier (high → low):

TierDefinitionGenesSymbols
AApproved (phase 4 drug)0
BPhased (≥1) drug, not yet approved0
CDruggable family + PDB, no drug0
DDruggable family + AlphaFold only, no drug0
EDifficult family or no structure, no drug2SUMO1, IRF6

Undrugged target profiles

2 cohort genes are undrugged. Ranked by ‘starting-point quality’ (assay depth + drugged-partner adjacency).

SymbolChEMBL assaysDrugged partners (top 3)
SUMO113
IRF60

Clinical trials & evidence

Clinical trials

Clinical trials: 0.