Plantar fibromatosis

disease
On this page

Also known as Ledderhose's diseaseLederhose diseaseplantar part of pes superficial Fibromatosissuperficial fibromatosis of plantar part of pes

Summary

Plantar fibromatosis (MONDO:0004684) is a disease with 2 cohort genes (2 GWAS associations across 1 studies) and 3 clinical trials.

At a glance

  • Cohort genes: 2
  • GWAS associations: 2
  • Phenotypes (HPO): 5
  • Clinical trials: 3

Clinical features

Signs & symptoms

Clinical features (HPO)

5 HPO clinical features (Orphanet curated; top 5 by frequency):

HPO IDTermFrequency
HP:0002829ArthralgiaVery frequent (80-99%)
HP:0003401ParesthesiaVery frequent (80-99%)
HP:0100679Lack of skin elasticityVery frequent (80-99%)
HP:0001482Subcutaneous noduleFrequent (30-79%)
HP:0009830Peripheral neuropathyOccasional (5-29%)

Identifiers

Disease identifiers

FieldValue
Canonical nameplantar fibromatosis
Mondo IDMONDO:0004684
EFOEFO:1000481
MeSHC537000
Orphanet199251
DOIDDOID:8936
ICD-11409482033
NCITC4680
SNOMED CT13370002
UMLSC0158360
MedGen56385
GARD0006873
MedDRA10035154
Anatomy (UBERON)UBERON:0008338
Is cancer (heuristic)no

Also known as: Ledderhose’s disease · Lederhose disease · plantar fibromatosis · plantar part of pes superficial Fibromatosis · plantar part of pes superficial fibromatosis · superficial fibromatosis of plantar part of pes

Data availability: 2 GWAS associations (1 study).

Disease family

Classification path: disease › human disease › disease by etiologic mechanism › cancer or benign tumorneoplastic disease or syndromeneoplasmmesenchymal cell neoplasm › fibroblastic neoplasm › fibromatosis › superficial Fibromatosis › plantar fibromatosis

Related subtypes (5): palmar fibromatosis, familial Dupuytren contracture, Peyronie disease, calcified aponeurotic fibroma, infantile digital fibromatosis

Genetics & variants

GWAS landscape

2 GWAS associations across 1 studies. Top hits map to 1 distinct genes (as reported by GWAS).

Top associations by p-value

rsIDp-valueGeneRisk alleleOdds ratio
rs620513842e-08WWP2T1.07
chr5:1187041533e-08TGC1.08

Top studies (by case count)

StudyLead authorYearCasesControlsTitle
GCST005558Kim SK201817,62765,637Two Genetic Variants Associated with Plantar Fascial Disorders.

Variant details and genetic-evidence tiers

Tier distribution (top 50 variants)

TierVariants
Tier 1: coding0
Tier 2: splice/UTR0
Tier 3: regulatory0
Tier 4: intronic/intergenic2

MAF distribution

BucketVariants
common (>=0.05)2
low_freq (0.01-0.05)0
rare (<0.01)0
unknown0

Functional consequences

ConsequenceCount
intron_variant1
unknown1

Top variants

rsIDChrPosAllelesMAFConsequenceGenep-valueTier
rs620513841669825279C>T0.373intron_variantWWP22e-08Tier 4: intronic/intergenic
chr5:1187041530.3223e-08Tier 4: intronic/intergenic

Genes & proteins

Mendelian disease overlap and somatic drivers

GenCC: 0 · Orphanet: 0 · OMIM-shared: 0 · Dual-evidence (GWAS+Mendelian): 0

Cohort genes → proteins

2 cohort genes, 2 distinct canonical proteins.

Evidence partition

SubsetGenes
gwas_only2

Cohort genes (full)

SymbolHGNCEnsemblUniProtNameEvidence
WWP2HGNC:16804ENSG00000198373O00308NEDD4-like E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase WWP2gwas
TNFAIP8HGNC:17260ENSG00000145779O95379Tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced protein 8gwas

Cohort function summary

Lead sentence per gene, UniProt-curated.

SymbolProtein nameFunction (lead sentence)
WWP2NEDD4-like E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase WWP2E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase which accepts ubiquitin from an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme in the form of a thioester and then directly transfers the ubiquitin to targeted substrates.
TNFAIP8Tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced protein 8Acts as a negative mediator of apoptosis and may play a role in tumor progression.

Protein-family classification

Druggable: 0 · Difficult: 1 · Unknown: 1 · Druggable fraction: 0.0

Family distribution

Cohort families vs a genome-wide background (hypergeometric, BH-FDR; fold = observed/expected). Counts kept; sorted by enrichment, so the catch-all Other/Unknown bucket no longer leads.

FamilyGenesFoldFDR
Scaffold/PPI18.6×0.225
Other/Unknown10.9×0.805

Per-gene assignment

SymbolFamilyDruggable?ECInterPro (top 3)
WWP2Scaffold/PPIno2.3.2.26C2_dom, HECT_dom, WW_dom
TNFAIP8Other/UnknownnoTNFAIP8-like, TNFAIP8_sf

Expression context

Cohort genes with no expression data: 0.

2 cohort genes are a single-cell marker in ≥1 SCXA experiment.

Breadth distribution (Bgee present_calls)

BucketGenes
narrow (1-5 tissues)0
moderate (6-20)0
broad (>20)2
unknown0

Top tissues across cohort

TissueCohort genes
ascending aorta1
tendon of biceps brachii1
tibia1
cartilage tissue1
epithelium of nasopharynx1
nasopharynx1

Per-gene tissue summary (top 30)

SymbolBgee breadthFANTOM5 breadthSCXATop tissues
WWP2279ubiquitousmarkertibia, tendon of biceps brachii, ascending aorta
TNFAIP8255ubiquitousmarkercartilage tissue, epithelium of nasopharynx, nasopharynx

Protein interactions among cohort

Intra-cohort edges: 0.

Hub genes (top 10 by interactor count)

SymbolInteractor count
WWP24,978
TNFAIP8491

Structural data

PDB: 1 · AlphaFold-only: 1 · No structure: 0

Cohort genes with PDB structures (top 30)

SymbolUniProtPDB entries
WWP2O0030811

AlphaFold-only cohort genes (top 30 by pLDDT)

SymbolUniProtpLDDT
TNFAIP8O9537989.83

Function

Pathway analysis

Distinct Reactome pathways touched by cohort: 9. Enrichment computed across 2 evidence-associated genes (2 with Reactome annotation).

Pathways by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 2 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

PathwayCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
NOTCH3 Activation and Transmission of Signal to the Nucleus1237.9×0.014WWP2
PI Metabolism1178.4×0.014TNFAIP8
RHOU GTPase cycle1139.3×0.014WWP2
Phospholipid metabolism1100.2×0.014TNFAIP8
RHOJ GTPase cycle1100.2×0.014WWP2
Regulation of PTEN stability and activity192.1×0.014WWP2
RHOQ GTPase cycle190.6×0.014WWP2
Metabolism of lipids115.8×0.070TNFAIP8
Metabolism15.8×0.165TNFAIP8

GO biological processes by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 2 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

GO termCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
extracellular transport12808.7×0.006WWP2
negative regulation of potassium ion export across plasma membrane11203.7×0.007WWP2
regulation of monoatomic ion transmembrane transport1366.4×0.015WWP2
negative regulation of Notch signaling pathway1216.1×0.017WWP2
symbiont entry into host cell1200.6×0.017WWP2
protein K63-linked ubiquitination1133.8×0.018WWP2
protein autoubiquitination1117.0×0.018WWP2
regulation of membrane potential1115.4×0.018WWP2
transcription by RNA polymerase II135.3×0.053WWP2
positive regulation of apoptotic process128.4×0.059TNFAIP8
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process126.1×0.059WWP2
protein ubiquitination120.7×0.068WWP2
negative regulation of apoptotic process117.4×0.074TNFAIP8
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcription115.8×0.076WWP2
apoptotic process114.3×0.078TNFAIP8
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II18.9×0.117WWP2
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II17.4×0.130WWP2

Therapeutics

Drug target analysis

Approved (phase 4): 0 · Phase ≥3: 0 · Phased (≥1): 0 · Undrugged: 2

Druggability breadth: 0 of 2 evidence-associated genes (0%) have a ChEMBL target (buckets above are over the deeply-mined display cohort).

Top cohort targets by molecule count

SymbolMoleculesMax phase
WWP200
TNFAIP800

Bioactivity and enzyme data

Enzyme cohort genes (≥1 EC): 1.

Cohort enzymes (BRENDA EC)

SymbolEC numbersNames
WWP22.3.2.26HECT-type E3 ubiquitin transferase

Pharmacogenomics

Cohort genes with a PharmGKB record: 2; with CPIC/DPWG dosing guidelines: 0.

No cohort gene has a CPIC/DPWG genotype-guided dosing guideline (PharmGKB).

Chemical tractability of cohort targets

0 approved/phased compounds have measured bioactivity against a cohort gene (and aren’t yet in disease-level trials). This is a research / tractability signal, NOT a therapeutic recommendation — a bioactivity row often reflects off-target or screening binding (e.g. promiscuous kinase inhibitors against a cohort kinase), implying no disease mechanism.

Druggability pyramid

Cohort genes binned by druggability tier (high → low):

TierDefinitionGenesSymbols
AApproved (phase 4 drug)0
BPhased (≥1) drug, not yet approved0
CDruggable family + PDB, no drug0
DDruggable family + AlphaFold only, no drug0
EDifficult family or no structure, no drug2WWP2, TNFAIP8

Undrugged target profiles

2 cohort genes are undrugged. Ranked by ‘starting-point quality’ (assay depth + drugged-partner adjacency).

SymbolChEMBL assaysDrugged partners (top 3)
WWP20
TNFAIP80

Clinical trials & evidence

Clinical trials

Clinical trials: 3.

Phase distribution (across all retrieved trials)

PhaseTrials
PHASE32
PHASE21

Top trials by phase / activity

NCTPhaseStatusTitle
NCT06151197PHASE3ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGStudy to Assess EN3835 in the Treatment of Plantar Fibromatosis (Also Known as Ledderhose Disease)
NCT05254457PHASE3COMPLETEDLong-Term Safety, Efficacy, and Durability of EN3835 in the Treatment and Retreatment of Plantar Fibromatosis
NCT05152173PHASE2COMPLETEDEfficacy, Safety, and Tolerability, of EN3835 vs Placebo in the Treatment of Plantar Fibromatosis