POLE-related polyposis and colorectal cancer syndrome

disease
On this page

Summary

POLE-related polyposis and colorectal cancer syndrome (MONDO:0100287) is a cancer caused by POLE (GenCC Definitive), with 1 cohort gene (1 CIViC-evidence somatic driver; 34 ClinVar predisposition records).

At a glance

  • Classification: Cancer
  • Causal gene: POLE (GenCC Definitive)
  • Cohort genes: 1
  • ClinVar variants: 34

Clinical features

No curated clinical features (Orphanet) for this disease.

Identifiers

Disease identifiers

FieldValue
Canonical namePOLE-related polyposis and colorectal cancer syndrome
Mondo IDMONDO:0100287
GARD0026124
Is cancer (heuristic)yes

Data availability: 34 ClinVar variants · 2 GenCC gene-disease records.

Disease family

Classification path: disease › human disease › disease by etiologic mechanism › cancer or benign tumorpolypneoplastic polyppolyposisPOLE-related polyposis and colorectal cancer syndrome

Related subtypes (3): polyposis, intestinal, scattered and discrete, gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach, POLD1-related polyposis and colorectal cancer syndrome

Genetics & variants

GWAS landscape

No GWAS associations recorded — common-variant (GWAS) studies don’t cover this disease (typical for Mendelian / rare diseases). See the curated gene cohort and Mendelian overlap below.

Variant details and genetic-evidence tiers

ClinVar germline variants

34 retrieved; paginated sample, class counts are floors:

17 likely benign, 6 benign/likely benign, 5 conflicting classifications of pathogenicity, 4 benign, 1 uncertain significance, 1 pathogenic/likely pathogenic

ClinVarVariant (HGVS)GeneClassificationReview
619085NM_006231.4(POLE):c.1686+32C>GPOLEPathogenic/Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
1134372NM_006231.4(POLE):c.3379-4G>APOLEConflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
240412NM_006231.4(POLE):c.1924-5C>TPOLEConflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
240463NM_006231.4(POLE):c.330+3G>APOLEConflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
381760NM_006231.4(POLE):c.1360-14C>TPOLEConflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
405829NM_006231.4(POLE):c.5173+1G>TPOLEConflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
405791NM_006231.4(POLE):c.2209A>G (p.Thr737Ala)POLEUncertain significancecriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
1559688NM_006231.4(POLE):c.62+13C>TLOC130009266Likely benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
380208NM_006231.4(POLE):c.62+15C>TLOC130009266Benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
1143272NM_006231.4(POLE):c.801+8T>APOLELikely benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
1151808NM_006231.4(POLE):c.5552+10C>APOLELikely benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
1595964NM_006231.4(POLE):c.5552+13C>TPOLELikely benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
221145NM_006231.4(POLE):c.1359+9G>APOLEBenign/Likely benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
3677452NM_006231.4(POLE):c.330+15T>CPOLELikely benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
371924NM_006231.4(POLE):c.1226+13G>APOLELikely benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
371925NM_006231.4(POLE):c.4952+11T>APOLELikely benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
3780465NM_006231.4(POLE):c.2026+9C>GPOLELikely benigncriteria provided, single submitter
380209NM_006231.4(POLE):c.910-6G>CPOLEBenigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
380213NM_006231.4(POLE):c.4444+4T>APOLEBenigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
380218NM_006231.4(POLE):c.6330+15G>APOLEBenigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
380709NM_006231.4(POLE):c.4552-11C>TPOLELikely benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
381931NM_006231.4(POLE):c.6532-11G>CPOLELikely benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
385730NM_006231.4(POLE):c.6748-11T>APOLEBenign/Likely benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
386531NM_006231.4(POLE):c.1360-13G>APOLELikely benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
386826NM_006231.4(POLE):c.285+13C>APOLEBenign/Likely benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
391845NM_006231.4(POLE):c.4952+10G>APOLELikely benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
413539NM_006231.4(POLE):c.1924-6T>CPOLEBenign/Likely benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
413555NM_006231.4(POLE):c.721-4G>TPOLELikely benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
439266NM_006231.4(POLE):c.2865-4dupPOLEBenign/Likely benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
473650NM_006231.4(POLE):c.4150-8C>APOLELikely benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Genes & proteins

Mendelian disease overlap and somatic drivers

GenCC: 13 · Orphanet: 4 · OMIM-shared: 0 · Dual-evidence (GWAS+Mendelian): 0

Somatic driver evidence (intOGen + CIViC, cohort fanout)

GeneintOGen roleCancer typesCIViC
POLEActACC,BLCACIViC #4386

GenCC gene–disease validity (cohort genes)

the Disease column is the GenCC-asserted condition — a cohort gene’s strongest validity may be for a related predisposition syndrome.

GeneClassificationInheritanceDiseaseRecords
POLEDefinitiveAutosomal dominantPOLE-related polyposis and colorectal cancer syndrome13

Orphanet rare-disease linkage (cohort genes)

GeneOrphanet IDRare disease
POLEOrphanet:352712Facial dysmorphism-immunodeficiency-livedo-short stature syndrome
POLEOrphanet:440437Familial colorectal cancer Type X
POLEOrphanet:447877Polymerase proofreading-related polyposis
POLEOrphanet:85173IMAGe syndrome

Cohort genes → proteins

1 cohort genes, 1 distinct canonical proteins.

Evidence partition

SubsetGenes
multi_evidence1

Cohort genes (full)

SymbolHGNCEnsemblUniProtNameEvidence
POLEHGNC:9177ENSG00000177084Q07864DNA polymerase epsilon catalytic subunit Agencc,clinvar

Cohort function summary

Lead sentence per gene, UniProt-curated.

SymbolProtein nameFunction (lead sentence)
POLEDNA polymerase epsilon catalytic subunit ACatalytic component of the DNA polymerase epsilon complex.

Protein-family classification

Druggable: 0 · Difficult: 1 · Unknown: 0 · Druggable fraction: 0.0

Family distribution

Cohort families vs a genome-wide background (hypergeometric, BH-FDR; fold = observed/expected). Counts kept; sorted by enrichment, so the catch-all Other/Unknown bucket no longer leads.

FamilyGenesFoldFDR
Transcription factor18.3×0.121

Per-gene assignment

SymbolFamilyDruggable?ECInterPro (top 3)
POLETranscription factorno2.7.7.7DNA-dir_DNA_pol_B_exonuc, DNA-dir_DNA_pol_B, RNaseH-like_sf

Expression context

Cohort genes with no expression data: 0.

1 cohort gene are a single-cell marker in ≥1 SCXA experiment.

Breadth distribution (Bgee present_calls)

BucketGenes
narrow (1-5 tissues)0
moderate (6-20)0
broad (>20)1
unknown0

Top tissues across cohort

TissueCohort genes
cerebellar hemisphere1
right hemisphere of cerebellum1
right testis1

Per-gene tissue summary (top 30)

SymbolBgee breadthFANTOM5 breadthSCXATop tissues
POLE221ubiquitousmarkerright hemisphere of cerebellum, right testis, cerebellar hemisphere

Protein interactions among cohort

Intra-cohort edges: 0.

Hub genes (top 10 by interactor count)

SymbolInteractor count
POLE3,267

Structural data

PDB: 1 · AlphaFold-only: 0 · No structure: 0

Cohort genes with PDB structures (top 30)

SymbolUniProtPDB entries
POLEQ0786418

Function

Pathway analysis

Distinct Reactome pathways touched by cohort: 10. Enrichment computed across 1 evidence-associated genes (1 with Reactome annotation).

Pathways by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 1 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

PathwayCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
DNA replication initiation11427.5×0.005POLE
PCNA-Dependent Long Patch Base Excision Repair1519.1×0.005POLE
Gap-filling DNA repair synthesis and ligation in GG-NER1439.2×0.005POLE
Recognition of DNA damage by PCNA-containing replication complex1380.7×0.005POLE
Termination of translesion DNA synthesis1346.1×0.005POLE
Activation of the pre-replicative complex1326.3×0.005POLE
Dual Incision in GG-NER1259.6×0.006POLE
HDR through Homologous Recombination (HRR)1190.3×0.006POLE
Gap-filling DNA repair synthesis and ligation in TC-NER1178.4×0.006POLE
Dual incision in TC-NER1173.0×0.006POLE

GO biological processes by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 1 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

GO termCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
DNA replication proofreading15617.3×0.001POLE
leading strand elongation14213.0×0.001POLE
nucleotide-excision repair, DNA gap filling12808.7×0.001POLE
base-excision repair, gap-filling11123.5×0.002POLE
DNA synthesis involved in DNA repair1936.2×0.002POLE
DNA-templated DNA replication1561.7×0.003POLE
embryonic organ development1481.5×0.003POLE
G1/S transition of mitotic cell cycle1200.6×0.006POLE
DNA replication1165.2×0.007POLE
mitotic cell cycle1133.8×0.007POLE

Therapeutics

Drug target analysis

Approved (phase 4): 0 · Phase ≥3: 0 · Phased (≥1): 0 · Undrugged: 1

Druggability breadth: 1 of 1 evidence-associated genes (100%) have a ChEMBL target (buckets above are over the deeply-mined display cohort).

Top cohort targets by molecule count

SymbolMoleculesMax phase
POLE00

Bioactivity and enzyme data

Enzyme cohort genes (≥1 EC): 1.

Cohort enzymes (BRENDA EC)

SymbolEC numbersNames
POLE2.7.7.7DNA-directed DNA polymerase

Pharmacogenomics

Cohort genes with a PharmGKB record: 1; with CPIC/DPWG dosing guidelines: 0.

No cohort gene has a CPIC/DPWG genotype-guided dosing guideline (PharmGKB).

Drug repurposing candidates

0 approved/phased drugs hit cohort targets but don’t yet appear in disease-level clinical trials. Target-inhibition rationale is strongest for cancer driver genes; a bioactivity hit is a screening signal, not a treatment claim.

Druggability pyramid

Cohort genes binned by druggability tier (high → low):

TierDefinitionGenesSymbols
AApproved (phase 4 drug)0
BPhased (≥1) drug, not yet approved0
CDruggable family + PDB, no drug0
DDruggable family + AlphaFold only, no drug0
EDifficult family or no structure, no drug1POLE

Undrugged target profiles

1 cohort genes are undrugged. Ranked by ‘starting-point quality’ (assay depth + drugged-partner adjacency).

SymbolChEMBL assaysDrugged partners (top 3)
POLE0

Clinical trials & evidence

Clinical trials

Clinical trials: 0.