Spermatogenic failure 61

disease
On this page

Also known as SPGF61

Summary

Spermatogenic failure 61 (MONDO:0030507) is a disease caused by STAG3 (GenCC Strong), with 1 cohort gene.

At a glance

  • Causal gene: STAG3 (GenCC Strong)
  • Cohort genes: 1
  • ClinVar variants: 11

Clinical features

No curated clinical features (Orphanet) for this disease.

Identifiers

Disease identifiers

FieldValue
Canonical namespermatogenic failure 61
Mondo IDMONDO:0030507
OMIM619672
DOIDDOID:0112350
UMLSC5562048
MedGen1794258
Is cancer (heuristic)no

Also known as: SPGF61

Data availability: 11 ClinVar variants · 2 GenCC gene-disease records.

Disease family

Classification path: disease › human disease › disease by etiologic mechanism › disease of genetic or genomic mechanism › hereditary diseasespermatogenic failurespermatogenic failure 61

Related subtypes (112): spermatogenic failure 6, spermatogenic failure 2, spermatogenic failure 5, spermatogenic failure 1, spermatogenic failure 4, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 2, spermatogenic failure, Y-linked, 1, spermatogenic failure, Y-linked, 2, spermatogenic failure 3, spermatogenic failure 7, spermatogenic failure 8, spermatogenic failure 9, spermatogenic failure 10, spermatogenic failure 11, spermatogenic failure 12, spermatogenic failure 13, spermatogenic failure 14, spermatogenic failure 15, spermatogenic failure 16, spermatogenic failure 17, spermatogenic failure 30, spermatogenic failure 31, spermatogenic failure 32, spermatogenic failure 54, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 4, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 3, spermatogenic failure 33, spermatogenic failure 34, spermatogenic failure 55, spermatogenic failure 56, spermatogenic failure 57, spermatogenic failure 58, spermatogenic failure 59, spermatogenic failure 60, spermatogenic failure 62, spermatogenic failure 63, spermatogenic failure 64, spermatogenic failure 65, spermatogenic failure 66, spermatogenic failure 67, spermatogenic failure 68, spermatogenic failure 69, spermatogenic failure 70, spermatogenic failure 71, spermatogenic failure 72, spermatogenic failure 73, spermatogenic failure 47, spermatogenic failure 48, spermatogenic failure 49, spermatogenic failure 50, spermatogenic failure 51, spermatogenic failure 52, spermatogenic failure 74, spermatogenic failure 75, spermatogenic failure 53, spermatogenic failure 76, spermatogenic failure 77, spermatogenic failure 35, spermatogenic failure 36, spermatogenic failure 37, spermatogenic failure 38, spermatogenic failure 39, spermatogenic failure 40, spermatogenic failure 41, spermatogenic failure 42, spermatogenic failure 43, spermatogenic failure 44, spermatogenic failure 45, spermatogenic failure 46, spermatogenic failure 18, spermatogenic failure 19, spermatogenic failure 20, spermatogenic failure 21, spermatogenic failure 22, spermatogenic failure 23, spermatogenic failure 24, spermatogenic failure 25, spermatogenic failure 26, spermatogenic failure 27, spermatogenic failure 28, spermatogenic failure 29, X-linked spermatogenic failure 1, spermatogenic failure 98, spermatogenic failure 78, spermatogenic failure 79, spermatogenic failure 80, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 5, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 6, spermatogenic failure 81, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 7, spermatogenic failure 82, spermatogenic failure 83, spermatogenic failure 84, spermatogenic failure 85, spermatogenic failure 86, spermatogenic failure 87, spermatogenic failure 88, spermatogenic failure 89, spermatogenic failure 90, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 8, spermatogenic failure 91, spermatogenic failure 92, spermatogenic failure 93, spermatogenic failure 94, spermatogenic failure 95, spermatogenic failure 96, spermatogenic failure 97, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 9, spermatogenic failure 99, spermatogenic failure 100, spermatogenic failure 101, spermatogenic failure 102

Genetics & variants

GWAS landscape

No GWAS associations recorded — common-variant (GWAS) studies don’t cover this disease (typical for Mendelian / rare diseases). See the curated gene cohort and Mendelian overlap below.

Variant details and genetic-evidence tiers

ClinVar germline variants

11 retrieved; paginated sample, class counts are floors:

6 benign, 2 pathogenic, 2 likely pathogenic, 1 pathogenic/likely pathogenic

ClinVarVariant (HGVS)GeneClassificationReview
1328924NM_001282717.2(STAG3):c.1936dup (p.Ala646fs)STAG3Pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
1328925NM_001282717.2(STAG3):c.2394+1G>ASTAG3Pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
692153NM_001282717.2(STAG3):c.962G>A (p.Arg321His)STAG3Pathogenic/Likely pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
617739NM_001282717.2(STAG3):c.1262T>G (p.Leu421Arg)STAG3Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
617740NM_001282717.2(STAG3):c.1312C>T (p.Arg438Ter)STAG3Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
1183740NM_001282717.2(STAG3):c.106A>C (p.Thr36Pro)STAG3Benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
1229759NM_001282717.2(STAG3):c.1245-26T>CSTAG3Benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
1230818NM_001282717.2(STAG3):c.2445T>A (p.Ile815=)STAG3Benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
1236675NM_001282717.2(STAG3):c.48G>T (p.Leu16Phe)STAG3Benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
1243986NM_001282717.2(STAG3):c.1293A>C (p.Pro431=)STAG3Benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
1287786NM_001282717.2(STAG3):c.1573+41C>GSTAG3Benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Genes & proteins

Mendelian disease overlap and somatic drivers

GenCC: 4 · Orphanet: 1 · OMIM-shared: 0 · Dual-evidence (GWAS+Mendelian): 0

GenCC gene–disease validity (cohort genes)

the Disease column is the GenCC-asserted condition — a cohort gene’s strongest validity may be for a related predisposition syndrome.

GeneClassificationInheritanceDiseaseRecords
STAG3StrongAutosomal recessivepremature ovarian failure 84

Orphanet rare-disease linkage (cohort genes)

GeneOrphanet IDRare disease
STAG3Orphanet:399805Male infertility with azoospermia or oligozoospermia due to single gene mutation

Cohort genes → proteins

1 cohort genes, 1 distinct canonical proteins.

Evidence partition

SubsetGenes
multi_evidence1

Cohort genes (full)

SymbolHGNCEnsemblUniProtNameEvidence
STAG3HGNC:11356ENSG00000066923Q9UJ98Cohesin subunit SA-3gencc,clinvar

Cohort function summary

Lead sentence per gene, UniProt-curated.

SymbolProtein nameFunction (lead sentence)
STAG3Cohesin subunit SA-3Meiosis specific component of cohesin complex.

Protein-family classification

Druggable: 0 · Difficult: 0 · Unknown: 1 · Druggable fraction: 0.0

Family distribution

Cohort families vs a genome-wide background (hypergeometric, BH-FDR; fold = observed/expected). Counts kept; sorted by enrichment, so the catch-all Other/Unknown bucket no longer leads.

FamilyGenesFoldFDR
Other/Unknown11.8×0.558

Per-gene assignment

SymbolFamilyDruggable?ECInterPro (top 3)
STAG3Other/UnknownnoSTAG, ARM-type_fold, SCD

Expression context

Cohort genes with no expression data: 0.

1 cohort gene are a single-cell marker in ≥1 SCXA experiment.

Breadth distribution (Bgee present_calls)

BucketGenes
narrow (1-5 tissues)0
moderate (6-20)0
broad (>20)1
unknown0

Top tissues across cohort

TissueCohort genes
left testis1
oocyte1
right testis1

Per-gene tissue summary (top 30)

SymbolBgee breadthFANTOM5 breadthSCXATop tissues
STAG3185broadmarkeroocyte, right testis, left testis

Protein interactions among cohort

Intra-cohort edges: 0.

Hub genes (top 10 by interactor count)

SymbolInteractor count
STAG31,232

Structural data

PDB: 0 · AlphaFold-only: 1 · No structure: 0

AlphaFold-only cohort genes (top 30 by pLDDT)

SymbolUniProtpLDDT
STAG3Q9UJ9878.46

Function

Pathway analysis

Distinct Reactome pathways touched by cohort: 4. Enrichment computed across 1 evidence-associated genes (1 with Reactome annotation).

Pathways by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 1 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

PathwayCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
Meiosis1285.5×0.009STAG3
Reproduction1190.3×0.009STAG3
Meiotic synapsis1141.0×0.009STAG3
Cell Cycle136.0×0.028STAG3

GO biological processes by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 1 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

GO termCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
establishment of meiotic sister chromatid cohesion14213.0×7e-04STAG3
sister chromatid cohesion1766.0×0.002STAG3
synaptonemal complex assembly1648.1×0.002STAG3

Therapeutics

Drug target analysis

Approved (phase 4): 0 · Phase ≥3: 0 · Phased (≥1): 0 · Undrugged: 1

Druggability breadth: 0 of 1 evidence-associated genes (0%) have a ChEMBL target (buckets above are over the deeply-mined display cohort).

Top cohort targets by molecule count

SymbolMoleculesMax phase
STAG300

Bioactivity and enzyme data

Enzyme cohort genes (≥1 EC): 0.

Pharmacogenomics

Cohort genes with a PharmGKB record: 1; with CPIC/DPWG dosing guidelines: 0.

No cohort gene has a CPIC/DPWG genotype-guided dosing guideline (PharmGKB).

Chemical tractability of cohort targets

0 approved/phased compounds have measured bioactivity against a cohort gene (and aren’t yet in disease-level trials). This is a research / tractability signal, NOT a therapeutic recommendation — a bioactivity row often reflects off-target or screening binding (e.g. promiscuous kinase inhibitors against a cohort kinase), implying no disease mechanism.

Druggability pyramid

Cohort genes binned by druggability tier (high → low):

TierDefinitionGenesSymbols
AApproved (phase 4 drug)0
BPhased (≥1) drug, not yet approved0
CDruggable family + PDB, no drug0
DDruggable family + AlphaFold only, no drug0
EDifficult family or no structure, no drug1STAG3

Undrugged target profiles

1 cohort genes are undrugged. Ranked by ‘starting-point quality’ (assay depth + drugged-partner adjacency).

SymbolChEMBL assaysDrugged partners (top 3)
STAG30

Clinical trials & evidence

Clinical trials

Clinical trials: 0.