Spermatogenic failure 7

disease
On this page

Also known as spermatogenic failure type 7SPGF7

Summary

Spermatogenic failure 7 (MONDO:0013070) is a disease with 2 cohort genes.

At a glance

  • Cohort genes: 2
  • ClinVar variants: 82

Clinical features

No curated clinical features (Orphanet) for this disease.

Identifiers

Disease identifiers

FieldValue
Canonical namespermatogenic failure 7
Mondo IDMONDO:0013070
MeSHC567832
OMIM612997
DOIDDOID:0070173
UMLSC2751811
MedGen414478
GARD0018400
Is cancer (heuristic)no

Also known as: spermatogenic failure 7 · spermatogenic failure type 7 · SPGF7

Data availability: 82 ClinVar variants · 1 GenCC gene-disease record.

Disease family

Classification path: disease › human disease › disease by etiologic mechanism › disease of genetic or genomic mechanism › hereditary diseasespermatogenic failurespermatogenic failure 7

Related subtypes (112): spermatogenic failure 6, spermatogenic failure 2, spermatogenic failure 5, spermatogenic failure 1, spermatogenic failure 4, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 2, spermatogenic failure, Y-linked, 1, spermatogenic failure, Y-linked, 2, spermatogenic failure 3, spermatogenic failure 8, spermatogenic failure 9, spermatogenic failure 10, spermatogenic failure 11, spermatogenic failure 12, spermatogenic failure 13, spermatogenic failure 14, spermatogenic failure 15, spermatogenic failure 16, spermatogenic failure 17, spermatogenic failure 30, spermatogenic failure 31, spermatogenic failure 32, spermatogenic failure 54, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 4, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 3, spermatogenic failure 33, spermatogenic failure 34, spermatogenic failure 55, spermatogenic failure 56, spermatogenic failure 57, spermatogenic failure 58, spermatogenic failure 59, spermatogenic failure 60, spermatogenic failure 61, spermatogenic failure 62, spermatogenic failure 63, spermatogenic failure 64, spermatogenic failure 65, spermatogenic failure 66, spermatogenic failure 67, spermatogenic failure 68, spermatogenic failure 69, spermatogenic failure 70, spermatogenic failure 71, spermatogenic failure 72, spermatogenic failure 73, spermatogenic failure 47, spermatogenic failure 48, spermatogenic failure 49, spermatogenic failure 50, spermatogenic failure 51, spermatogenic failure 52, spermatogenic failure 74, spermatogenic failure 75, spermatogenic failure 53, spermatogenic failure 76, spermatogenic failure 77, spermatogenic failure 35, spermatogenic failure 36, spermatogenic failure 37, spermatogenic failure 38, spermatogenic failure 39, spermatogenic failure 40, spermatogenic failure 41, spermatogenic failure 42, spermatogenic failure 43, spermatogenic failure 44, spermatogenic failure 45, spermatogenic failure 46, spermatogenic failure 18, spermatogenic failure 19, spermatogenic failure 20, spermatogenic failure 21, spermatogenic failure 22, spermatogenic failure 23, spermatogenic failure 24, spermatogenic failure 25, spermatogenic failure 26, spermatogenic failure 27, spermatogenic failure 28, spermatogenic failure 29, X-linked spermatogenic failure 1, spermatogenic failure 98, spermatogenic failure 78, spermatogenic failure 79, spermatogenic failure 80, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 5, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 6, spermatogenic failure 81, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 7, spermatogenic failure 82, spermatogenic failure 83, spermatogenic failure 84, spermatogenic failure 85, spermatogenic failure 86, spermatogenic failure 87, spermatogenic failure 88, spermatogenic failure 89, spermatogenic failure 90, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 8, spermatogenic failure 91, spermatogenic failure 92, spermatogenic failure 93, spermatogenic failure 94, spermatogenic failure 95, spermatogenic failure 96, spermatogenic failure 97, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 9, spermatogenic failure 99, spermatogenic failure 100, spermatogenic failure 101, spermatogenic failure 102

Genetics & variants

GWAS landscape

No GWAS associations recorded — common-variant (GWAS) studies don’t cover this disease (typical for Mendelian / rare diseases). See the curated gene cohort and Mendelian overlap below.

Variant details and genetic-evidence tiers

ClinVar germline variants

82 retrieved; paginated sample, class counts are floors:

53 uncertain significance, 10 conflicting classifications of pathogenicity, 7 benign, 5 benign/likely benign, 3 pathogenic, 2 likely benign, 1 likely pathogenic, 1 pathogenic/likely pathogenic

ClinVarVariant (HGVS)GeneClassificationReview
4400NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.539dup (p.His182fs)CATSPER1Pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
4401NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.944_948dup (p.Asp317fs)CATSPER1Pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
165315NM_153700.2(STRC):c.3670C>T (p.Arg1224Ter)STRCPathogeniccriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
505435NM_153700.2(STRC):c.4219-1G>ASTRCPathogenic/Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
2627058NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.889C>T (p.Arg297Ter)CATSPER1Likely pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
305424NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.1544-6C>TCATSPER1Conflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
305444NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.688C>T (p.Arg230Cys)CATSPER1Conflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
305448NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.333C>T (p.Tyr111=)CATSPER1Conflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
305450NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.144C>T (p.His48=)CATSPER1Conflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
711064NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.996G>C (p.Arg332=)CATSPER1Conflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
877902NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.148G>A (p.Val50Met)CATSPER1Conflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
879482NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.773G>A (p.Arg258His)CATSPER1Conflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
879841NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.689G>A (p.Arg230His)CATSPER1Conflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
165311NM_153700.2(STRC):c.4171C>G (p.Arg1391Gly)STRCConflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
3075838NM_153700.2(STRC):c.4765G>A (p.Val1589Ile)STRCConflicting classifications of pathogenicitycriteria provided, conflicting classifications
305414NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.*96G>ACATSPER1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
305415NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.*23G>ACATSPER1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
305416NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.2126-13T>CCATSPER1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
305417NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.2109G>A (p.Thr703=)CATSPER1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
305420NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.2064+6G>ACATSPER1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
305422NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.1884G>A (p.Thr628=)CATSPER1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
305423NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.1748T>G (p.Ile583Ser)CATSPER1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
305425NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.1544-10G>ACATSPER1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
305426NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.1544-11C>TCATSPER1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
305427NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.1542G>A (p.Leu514=)CATSPER1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
305428NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.1514C>T (p.Ser505Leu)CATSPER1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
305430NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.1445C>G (p.Ala482Gly)CATSPER1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
305431NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.1444G>A (p.Ala482Thr)CATSPER1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
305432NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.1384G>A (p.Val462Ile)CATSPER1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
305434NM_053054.4(CATSPER1):c.1195G>A (p.Gly399Arg)CATSPER1Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter

Genes & proteins

Mendelian disease overlap and somatic drivers

GenCC: 2 · Orphanet: 3 · OMIM-shared: 0 · Dual-evidence (GWAS+Mendelian): 0

GenCC gene–disease validity (cohort genes)

the Disease column is the GenCC-asserted condition — a cohort gene’s strongest validity may be for a related predisposition syndrome.

GeneClassificationInheritanceDiseaseRecords
CATSPER1LimitedUnknownspermatogenic failure 72

Orphanet rare-disease linkage (cohort genes)

GeneOrphanet IDRare disease
CATSPER1Orphanet:276234Non-syndromic male infertility due to sperm motility disorder
STRCOrphanet:90636Rare autosomal recessive non-syndromic sensorineural deafness type DFNB
STRCOrphanet:94064Deafness-infertility syndrome

Cohort genes → proteins

2 cohort genes, 2 distinct canonical proteins.

Evidence partition

SubsetGenes
multi_evidence2

Cohort genes (full)

SymbolHGNCEnsemblUniProtNameEvidence
CATSPER1HGNC:17116ENSG00000175294Q8NEC5Cation channel sperm-associated protein 1gencc,clinvar
STRCHGNC:16035ENSG00000242866Q7RTU9Stereocilinclinvar

Cohort function summary

Lead sentence per gene, UniProt-curated.

SymbolProtein nameFunction (lead sentence)
CATSPER1Cation channel sperm-associated protein 1Pore-forming subunit of the CatSper complex, a sperm-specific voltage-gated calcium channel that plays a central role in calcium-dependent physiological responses essential for successful fertilization, such as sperm hyperactivation, acros…
STRCStereocilinEssential to the formation of horizontal top connectors between outer hair cell stereocilia.

Protein-family classification

Druggable: 1 · Difficult: 0 · Unknown: 1 · Druggable fraction: 0.5

Family distribution

Cohort families vs a genome-wide background (hypergeometric, BH-FDR; fold = observed/expected). Counts kept; sorted by enrichment, so the catch-all Other/Unknown bucket no longer leads.

FamilyGenesFoldFDR
Ion channel155.8×0.036
Other/Unknown10.9×0.805

Per-gene assignment

SymbolFamilyDruggable?ECInterPro (top 3)
CATSPER1Ion channelyesIon_trans_dom, Volt_channel_dom_sf, CatSper1
STRCOther/UnknownnoStereocilin-rel, Stereocilin_LRR

Expression context

Cohort genes with no expression data: 0.

1 cohort gene are a single-cell marker in ≥1 SCXA experiment.

Breadth distribution (Bgee present_calls)

BucketGenes
narrow (1-5 tissues)0
moderate (6-20)0
broad (>20)2
unknown0

Top tissues across cohort

TissueCohort genes
leukocyte1
male germ line stem cell (sensu Vertebrata) in testis1
monocyte1
cerebellar cortex1
cerebellar hemisphere1
right hemisphere of cerebellum1

Per-gene tissue summary (top 30)

SymbolBgee breadthFANTOM5 breadthSCXATop tissues
CATSPER1135broadyesmale germ line stem cell (sensu Vertebrata) in testis, monocyte, leukocyte
STRC167markerright hemisphere of cerebellum, cerebellar hemisphere, cerebellar cortex

Protein interactions among cohort

Intra-cohort edges: 0.

Hub genes (top 10 by interactor count)

SymbolInteractor count
CATSPER11,621
STRC1,152

Structural data

PDB: 0 · AlphaFold-only: 2 · No structure: 0

AlphaFold-only cohort genes (top 30 by pLDDT)

SymbolUniProtpLDDT
STRCQ7RTU969.21
CATSPER1Q8NEC556.10

Function

Pathway analysis

Distinct Reactome pathways touched by cohort: 5. Enrichment computed across 2 evidence-associated genes (2 with Reactome annotation).

Pathways by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 2 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

PathwayCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
Sperm Motility And Taxes1634.4×0.008CATSPER1
Sensory processing of sound1154.3×0.015STRC
Sensory processing of sound by outer hair cells of the cochlea1102.0×0.015STRC
Sensory processing of sound by inner hair cells of the cochlea181.6×0.015STRC
Sensory Perception147.6×0.021STRC

GO biological processes by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 2 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

GO termCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
regulation of cilium beat frequency involved in ciliary motility1936.2×0.007CATSPER1
detection of mechanical stimulus involved in sensory perception of sound1468.1×0.007STRC
auditory receptor cell stereocilium organization1421.3×0.007STRC
calcium ion transport190.6×0.022CATSPER1
cell-matrix adhesion181.8×0.022STRC
flagellated sperm motility158.5×0.024CATSPER1
intracellular protein localization152.3×0.024STRC
spermatogenesis117.6×0.063CATSPER1
cell differentiation114.6×0.068CATSPER1

Therapeutics

Drug target analysis

Approved (phase 4): 0 · Phase ≥3: 0 · Phased (≥1): 0 · Undrugged: 2

Druggability breadth: 1 of 2 evidence-associated genes (50%) have a ChEMBL target (buckets above are over the deeply-mined display cohort).

Top cohort targets by molecule count

SymbolMoleculesMax phase
CATSPER100
STRC00

Bioactivity and enzyme data

Enzyme cohort genes (≥1 EC): 0.

Cohort genes with ChEMBL bioactivity (full, sorted by assay count)

SymbolAssaysType breakdown
CATSPER15Binding:5

Pharmacogenomics

Cohort genes with a PharmGKB record: 2; with CPIC/DPWG dosing guidelines: 0.

No cohort gene has a CPIC/DPWG genotype-guided dosing guideline (PharmGKB).

Chemical tractability of cohort targets

0 approved/phased compounds have measured bioactivity against a cohort gene (and aren’t yet in disease-level trials). This is a research / tractability signal, NOT a therapeutic recommendation — a bioactivity row often reflects off-target or screening binding (e.g. promiscuous kinase inhibitors against a cohort kinase), implying no disease mechanism.

Druggability pyramid

Cohort genes binned by druggability tier (high → low):

TierDefinitionGenesSymbols
AApproved (phase 4 drug)0
BPhased (≥1) drug, not yet approved0
CDruggable family + PDB, no drug0
DDruggable family + AlphaFold only, no drug1CATSPER1
EDifficult family or no structure, no drug1STRC

Undrugged target profiles

2 cohort genes are undrugged. Ranked by ‘starting-point quality’ (assay depth + drugged-partner adjacency).

SymbolChEMBL assaysDrugged partners (top 3)
CATSPER15
STRC0

Clinical trials & evidence

Clinical trials

Clinical trials: 0.