Spermatogenic failure 88

disease
On this page

Summary

Spermatogenic failure 88 (MONDO:0957821) is a disease with 3 cohort genes.

At a glance

  • Cohort genes: 3
  • ClinVar variants: 8

Clinical features

No curated clinical features (Orphanet) for this disease.

Identifiers

Disease identifiers

FieldValue
Canonical namespermatogenic failure 88
Mondo IDMONDO:0957821
OMIM620547
DOIDDOID:0070587
UMLSC5882706
MedGen1845113
Is cancer (heuristic)no

Data availability: 8 ClinVar variants.

Disease family

Classification path: disease › human disease › disease by etiologic mechanism › disease of genetic or genomic mechanism › hereditary diseasespermatogenic failurespermatogenic failure 88

Related subtypes (112): spermatogenic failure 6, spermatogenic failure 2, spermatogenic failure 5, spermatogenic failure 1, spermatogenic failure 4, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 2, spermatogenic failure, Y-linked, 1, spermatogenic failure, Y-linked, 2, spermatogenic failure 3, spermatogenic failure 7, spermatogenic failure 8, spermatogenic failure 9, spermatogenic failure 10, spermatogenic failure 11, spermatogenic failure 12, spermatogenic failure 13, spermatogenic failure 14, spermatogenic failure 15, spermatogenic failure 16, spermatogenic failure 17, spermatogenic failure 30, spermatogenic failure 31, spermatogenic failure 32, spermatogenic failure 54, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 4, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 3, spermatogenic failure 33, spermatogenic failure 34, spermatogenic failure 55, spermatogenic failure 56, spermatogenic failure 57, spermatogenic failure 58, spermatogenic failure 59, spermatogenic failure 60, spermatogenic failure 61, spermatogenic failure 62, spermatogenic failure 63, spermatogenic failure 64, spermatogenic failure 65, spermatogenic failure 66, spermatogenic failure 67, spermatogenic failure 68, spermatogenic failure 69, spermatogenic failure 70, spermatogenic failure 71, spermatogenic failure 72, spermatogenic failure 73, spermatogenic failure 47, spermatogenic failure 48, spermatogenic failure 49, spermatogenic failure 50, spermatogenic failure 51, spermatogenic failure 52, spermatogenic failure 74, spermatogenic failure 75, spermatogenic failure 53, spermatogenic failure 76, spermatogenic failure 77, spermatogenic failure 35, spermatogenic failure 36, spermatogenic failure 37, spermatogenic failure 38, spermatogenic failure 39, spermatogenic failure 40, spermatogenic failure 41, spermatogenic failure 42, spermatogenic failure 43, spermatogenic failure 44, spermatogenic failure 45, spermatogenic failure 46, spermatogenic failure 18, spermatogenic failure 19, spermatogenic failure 20, spermatogenic failure 21, spermatogenic failure 22, spermatogenic failure 23, spermatogenic failure 24, spermatogenic failure 25, spermatogenic failure 26, spermatogenic failure 27, spermatogenic failure 28, spermatogenic failure 29, X-linked spermatogenic failure 1, spermatogenic failure 98, spermatogenic failure 78, spermatogenic failure 79, spermatogenic failure 80, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 5, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 6, spermatogenic failure 81, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 7, spermatogenic failure 82, spermatogenic failure 83, spermatogenic failure 84, spermatogenic failure 85, spermatogenic failure 86, spermatogenic failure 87, spermatogenic failure 89, spermatogenic failure 90, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 8, spermatogenic failure 91, spermatogenic failure 92, spermatogenic failure 93, spermatogenic failure 94, spermatogenic failure 95, spermatogenic failure 96, spermatogenic failure 97, spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 9, spermatogenic failure 99, spermatogenic failure 100, spermatogenic failure 101, spermatogenic failure 102

Genetics & variants

GWAS landscape

No GWAS associations recorded — common-variant (GWAS) studies don’t cover this disease (typical for Mendelian / rare diseases). See the curated gene cohort and Mendelian overlap below.

Variant details and genetic-evidence tiers

ClinVar germline variants

8 retrieved; paginated sample, class counts are floors:

7 pathogenic, 1 uncertain significance

ClinVarVariant (HGVS)GeneClassificationReview
2626771NM_144688.5(KASH5):c.1604T>A (p.Leu535Gln)KASH5Pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
2626772NM_144688.5(KASH5):c.590T>C (p.Leu197Pro)KASH5Pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
2626773NM_144688.5(KASH5):c.981_982del (p.Arg327fs)KASH5Pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
2626774NM_144688.5(KASH5):c.-95-2_798+248delKASH5Pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
2626776NM_144688.5(KASH5):c.1271_1274del (p.Arg424fs)KASH5Pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
4277339NM_001099218.3(RAD51AP2):c.2985del (p.Asn995fs)RAD51AP2Pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
4277340NM_001302084.2(TOP6BL):c.25+1G>CTOP6BLPathogenicno assertion criteria provided
3064402NM_144688.5(KASH5):c.302T>C (p.Met101Thr)KASH5Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter

Genes & proteins

Mendelian disease overlap and somatic drivers

GenCC: 0 · Orphanet: 1 · OMIM-shared: 0 · Dual-evidence (GWAS+Mendelian): 0

Orphanet rare-disease linkage (cohort genes)

GeneOrphanet IDRare disease
TOP6BLOrphanet:254688Complete hydatidiform mole

Cohort genes → proteins

3 cohort genes, 3 distinct canonical proteins.

Evidence partition

SubsetGenes
multi_evidence3

Cohort genes (full)

SymbolHGNCEnsemblUniProtNameEvidence
TOP6BLHGNC:26197ENSG00000173715Q8N6T0Type 2 DNA topoisomerase 6 subunit B-likeclinvar
KASH5HGNC:26520ENSG00000161609Q8N6L0Protein KASH5clinvar
RAD51AP2HGNC:34417ENSG00000214842Q09MP3RAD51-associated protein 2clinvar

Cohort function summary

Lead sentence per gene, UniProt-curated.

SymbolProtein nameFunction (lead sentence)
TOP6BLType 2 DNA topoisomerase 6 subunit B-likeComponent of a topoisomerase 6 complex specifically required for meiotic recombination.
KASH5Protein KASH5As a component of the LINC (LInker of Nucleoskeleton and Cytoskeleton) complex, involved in the connection between the nuclear lamina and the cytoskeleton.

Protein-family classification

Druggable: 0 · Difficult: 0 · Unknown: 3 · Druggable fraction: 0.0

Family distribution

Cohort families vs a genome-wide background (hypergeometric, BH-FDR; fold = observed/expected). Counts kept; sorted by enrichment, so the catch-all Other/Unknown bucket no longer leads.

FamilyGenesFoldFDR
Other/Unknown31.8×0.174

Per-gene assignment

SymbolFamilyDruggable?ECInterPro (top 3)
TOP6BLOther/UnknownnoTopoVIB-like
KASH5Other/UnknownnoEF-hand-dom_pair, KASH5_CC, KASH5
RAD51AP2Other/UnknownnoRAD51_interact, RAD51-associated

Expression context

Cohort genes with no expression data: 0.

2 cohort genes are a single-cell marker in ≥1 SCXA experiment.

Breadth distribution (Bgee present_calls)

BucketGenes
narrow (1-5 tissues)0
moderate (6-20)0
broad (>20)3
unknown0

Top tissues across cohort

TissueCohort genes
right testis2
lower esophagus mucosa1
skin of abdomen1
skin of leg1
left testis1
testis1
male germ line stem cell (sensu Vertebrata) in testis1
primordial germ cell in gonad1

Per-gene tissue summary (top 30)

SymbolBgee breadthFANTOM5 breadthSCXATop tissues
TOP6BL186ubiquitousmarkerskin of abdomen, skin of leg, lower esophagus mucosa
KASH5112tissue_specificmarkerright testis, left testis, testis
RAD51AP264tissue_specificyesmale germ line stem cell (sensu Vertebrata) in testis, primordial germ cell in gonad, right testis

Protein interactions among cohort

Intra-cohort edges: 0.

Hub genes (top 10 by interactor count)

SymbolInteractor count
KASH51,547
RAD51AP2453
TOP6BL326

Structural data

PDB: 1 · AlphaFold-only: 2 · No structure: 0

Cohort genes with PDB structures (top 30)

SymbolUniProtPDB entries
KASH5Q8N6L02

AlphaFold-only cohort genes (top 30 by pLDDT)

SymbolUniProtpLDDT
TOP6BLQ8N6T068.14
RAD51AP2Q09MP333.74

Function

Pathway analysis

Distinct Reactome pathways touched by cohort: 0. Enrichment computed across 3 evidence-associated genes (0 with Reactome annotation).

GO biological processes by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 2 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

GO termCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
telomere localization18426.0×7e-04KASH5
chromosome localization to nuclear envelope involved in homologous chromosome segregation18426.0×7e-04KASH5
spindle localization11685.2×0.002KASH5
meiotic DNA double-strand break formation11203.7×0.002TOP6BL
meiotic telomere clustering1936.2×0.003KASH5
homologous chromosome pairing at meiosis1300.9×0.006KASH5
reciprocal meiotic recombination1280.9×0.006TOP6BL
spindle assembly1221.7×0.007KASH5
oogenesis1191.5×0.007KASH5
double-strand break repair via homologous recombination178.0×0.015KASH5
actin filament organization159.3×0.018KASH5
spermatogenesis117.6×0.056KASH5

Therapeutics

Drug target analysis

Approved (phase 4): 0 · Phase ≥3: 0 · Phased (≥1): 0 · Undrugged: 3

Druggability breadth: 0 of 3 evidence-associated genes (0%) have a ChEMBL target (buckets above are over the deeply-mined display cohort).

Top cohort targets by molecule count

SymbolMoleculesMax phase
TOP6BL00
KASH500
RAD51AP200

Bioactivity and enzyme data

Enzyme cohort genes (≥1 EC): 0.

Pharmacogenomics

Cohort genes with a PharmGKB record: 3; with CPIC/DPWG dosing guidelines: 0.

No cohort gene has a CPIC/DPWG genotype-guided dosing guideline (PharmGKB).

Chemical tractability of cohort targets

0 approved/phased compounds have measured bioactivity against a cohort gene (and aren’t yet in disease-level trials). This is a research / tractability signal, NOT a therapeutic recommendation — a bioactivity row often reflects off-target or screening binding (e.g. promiscuous kinase inhibitors against a cohort kinase), implying no disease mechanism.

Druggability pyramid

Cohort genes binned by druggability tier (high → low):

TierDefinitionGenesSymbols
AApproved (phase 4 drug)0
BPhased (≥1) drug, not yet approved0
CDruggable family + PDB, no drug0
DDruggable family + AlphaFold only, no drug0
EDifficult family or no structure, no drug3TOP6BL, KASH5, RAD51AP2

Undrugged target profiles

3 cohort genes are undrugged. Ranked by ‘starting-point quality’ (assay depth + drugged-partner adjacency).

SymbolChEMBL assaysDrugged partners (top 3)
TOP6BL0
KASH50
RAD51AP20

Clinical trials & evidence

Clinical trials

Clinical trials: 0.