Urofacial syndrome 2

disease
On this page

Also known as LRIG2 Ochoa syndromeOchoa syndrome caused by mutation in LRIG2UFS2urofacial syndrome type 2

Summary

Urofacial syndrome 2 (MONDO:0014049) is a disease caused by LRIG2 (GenCC Strong), with 1 cohort gene.

At a glance

  • Causal gene: LRIG2 (GenCC Strong)
  • Cohort genes: 1
  • ClinVar variants: 15

Clinical features

No curated clinical features (Orphanet) for this disease.

Identifiers

Disease identifiers

FieldValue
Canonical nameurofacial syndrome 2
Mondo IDMONDO:0014049
OMIM615112
UMLSC3554520
MedGen767434
GARD0015907
Is cancer (heuristic)no

Also known as: LRIG2 Ochoa syndrome · Ochoa syndrome caused by mutation in LRIG2 · UFS2 · urofacial syndrome 2 · urofacial syndrome type 2

Data availability: 15 ClinVar variants · 4 GenCC gene-disease records.

Disease family

Classification path: disease › human disease › disease by etiologic mechanism › disease of genetic or genomic mechanism › hereditary disease › autosomal genetic disease › autosomal recessive diseaseOchoa syndromeurofacial syndrome 2

Related subtypes (1): urofacial syndrome type 1

Genetics & variants

GWAS landscape

No GWAS associations recorded — common-variant (GWAS) studies don’t cover this disease (typical for Mendelian / rare diseases). See the curated gene cohort and Mendelian overlap below.

Variant details and genetic-evidence tiers

ClinVar germline variants

15 retrieved; paginated sample, class counts are floors:

5 uncertain significance, 4 pathogenic, 4 likely pathogenic, 2 benign

ClinVarVariant (HGVS)GeneClassificationReview
40206NM_014813.3(LRIG2):c.1230del (p.Glu410fs)LRIG2Pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
40207NM_014813.3(LRIG2):c.2125C>T (p.Arg709Ter)LRIG2Pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
40208NM_014813.3(LRIG2):c.2088del (p.Ser697fs)LRIG2Pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
40209NM_014813.2(LRIG2):c.1980_1981insJX891452.1:g.1_371 (p.Ile662Phefs)LRIG2Pathogenicno assertion criteria provided
4845798NM_014813.3(LRIG2):c.2530+1G>TLRIG2Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
4845891NM_014813.3(LRIG2):c.2777_2795del (p.Glu926fs)LRIG2Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
4849332NM_014813.3(LRIG2):c.524_527del (p.Ser175fs)LRIG2Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
666570NM_014813.1(LRIG2):c.1799-2_1799-1delAGLRIG2Likely pathogeniccriteria provided, single submitter
3574390NM_014813.3(LRIG2):c.31G>T (p.Glu11Ter)LRIG2Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
3574406NM_014813.3(LRIG2):c.515+14A>GLRIG2Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
3574445NM_014813.3(LRIG2):c.2543T>C (p.Leu848Pro)LRIG2Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
548630NM_014813.3(LRIG2):c.1696C>T (p.His566Tyr)LRIG2Uncertain significancecriteria provided, single submitter
548631NM_014813.3(LRIG2):c.256C>T (p.Arg86Trp)LRIG2Uncertain significancecriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
1300109NM_014813.3(LRIG2):c.2124A>C (p.Thr708=)LRIG2Benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
1300110NM_014813.3(LRIG2):c.2531-22G>ALRIG2Benigncriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Genes & proteins

Mendelian disease overlap and somatic drivers

GenCC: 5 · Orphanet: 1 · OMIM-shared: 0 · Dual-evidence (GWAS+Mendelian): 0

GenCC gene–disease validity (cohort genes)

the Disease column is the GenCC-asserted condition — a cohort gene’s strongest validity may be for a related predisposition syndrome.

GeneClassificationInheritanceDiseaseRecords
LRIG2StrongAutosomal recessiveurofacial syndrome 25

Orphanet rare-disease linkage (cohort genes)

GeneOrphanet IDRare disease
LRIG2Orphanet:2704Urofacial syndrome

Cohort genes → proteins

1 cohort genes, 1 distinct canonical proteins.

Evidence partition

SubsetGenes
multi_evidence1

Cohort genes (full)

SymbolHGNCEnsemblUniProtNameEvidence
LRIG2HGNC:20889ENSG00000198799O94898Leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domains protein 2gencc,clinvar

Protein-family classification

Druggable: 1 · Difficult: 0 · Unknown: 0 · Druggable fraction: 1.0

Family distribution

Cohort families vs a genome-wide background (hypergeometric, BH-FDR; fold = observed/expected). Counts kept; sorted by enrichment, so the catch-all Other/Unknown bucket no longer leads.

FamilyGenesFoldFDR
Antibody/Immunoglobulin129.2×0.034

Per-gene assignment

SymbolFamilyDruggable?ECInterPro (top 3)
LRIG2Antibody/ImmunoglobulinyesCys-rich_flank_reg_C, Leu-rich_rpt, Leu-rich_rpt_typical-subtyp

Expression context

Cohort genes with no expression data: 0.

Breadth distribution (Bgee present_calls)

BucketGenes
narrow (1-5 tissues)0
moderate (6-20)0
broad (>20)1
unknown0

Top tissues across cohort

TissueCohort genes
Brodmann (1909) area 231
endothelial cell1
tendon of biceps brachii1

Per-gene tissue summary (top 30)

SymbolBgee breadthFANTOM5 breadthSCXATop tissues
LRIG2267ubiquitousyestendon of biceps brachii, endothelial cell, Brodmann (1909) area 23

Protein interactions among cohort

Intra-cohort edges: 0.

Hub genes (top 10 by interactor count)

SymbolInteractor count
LRIG21,693

Structural data

PDB: 0 · AlphaFold-only: 1 · No structure: 0

AlphaFold-only cohort genes (top 30 by pLDDT)

SymbolUniProtpLDDT
LRIG2O9489874.87

Function

Pathway analysis

Distinct Reactome pathways touched by cohort: 0. Enrichment computed across 1 evidence-associated genes (0 with Reactome annotation).

GO biological processes by enrichment

Over-representation of cohort genes vs the genome-wide background (hypergeometric test, Benjamini-Hochberg FDR; fold = observed/expected over 1 annotated cohort genes). Counts and members are kept as ground-truth; sorted by enrichment.

GO termCohort genesFoldFDRSample cohort genes
regulation of platelet-derived growth factor receptor signaling pathway18426.0×0.001LRIG2
negative regulation of membrane protein ectodomain proteolysis11872.4×0.002LRIG2
negative regulation of axon regeneration11532.0×0.002LRIG2
innervation1887.0×0.002LRIG2
positive regulation of protein localization to cell surface1766.0×0.002LRIG2
membrane protein ectodomain proteolysis1648.1×0.002LRIG2
regulation of neuron migration1624.1×0.002LRIG2
protein localization to cell surface1495.6×0.002LRIG2
sensory perception of sound1100.9×0.010LRIG2

Therapeutics

Drug target analysis

Approved (phase 4): 0 · Phase ≥3: 0 · Phased (≥1): 0 · Undrugged: 1

Druggability breadth: 0 of 1 evidence-associated genes (0%) have a ChEMBL target (buckets above are over the deeply-mined display cohort).

Top cohort targets by molecule count

SymbolMoleculesMax phase
LRIG200

Bioactivity and enzyme data

Enzyme cohort genes (≥1 EC): 0.

Pharmacogenomics

Cohort genes with a PharmGKB record: 1; with CPIC/DPWG dosing guidelines: 0.

No cohort gene has a CPIC/DPWG genotype-guided dosing guideline (PharmGKB).

Chemical tractability of cohort targets

0 approved/phased compounds have measured bioactivity against a cohort gene (and aren’t yet in disease-level trials). This is a research / tractability signal, NOT a therapeutic recommendation — a bioactivity row often reflects off-target or screening binding (e.g. promiscuous kinase inhibitors against a cohort kinase), implying no disease mechanism.

Druggability pyramid

Cohort genes binned by druggability tier (high → low):

TierDefinitionGenesSymbols
AApproved (phase 4 drug)0
BPhased (≥1) drug, not yet approved0
CDruggable family + PDB, no drug0
DDruggable family + AlphaFold only, no drug1LRIG2
EDifficult family or no structure, no drug0

Undrugged target profiles

1 cohort genes are undrugged. Ranked by ‘starting-point quality’ (assay depth + drugged-partner adjacency).

SymbolChEMBL assaysDrugged partners (top 3)
LRIG20

Clinical trials & evidence

Clinical trials

Clinical trials: 0.