SCHEMBL10043700

SCHEMBL10043700

Cc1cc2c(cn1)cc(-c1cc(NC(=O)c3nc(C)oc3C(F)(F)F)ccc1C)c(=O)n2C

nearest known ligand 0.47

Predicted protein targets (top 7)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
SYK P43405 1/20 0.47
DGAT1 O75907 3/20 0.44
NTRK1 P04629 1/20 0.39
RAF1 P04049 8/20 0.37
BRAF P15056 7/20 0.37
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.36
POLB P06746 1/20 0.36

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL10043740 0.89 RAF1 (0.43) SYKRAF1BRAFALDH1A1POLB
SCHEMBL10072021 0.82 SYK (0.59) SYKRAF1BRAF
SCHEMBL10043661 0.82 SYK (0.55) SYKRAF1BRAF
SCHEMBL10043839 0.81 SYK (0.47) SYKRAF1BRAF
SCHEMBL10043698 0.80 SYK (0.70) SYKRAF1BRAF
SCHEMBL10043705 0.80 MAPT (0.54) SYKALDH1A1POLB
SCHEMBL10043683 0.80 NPC1 (0.46) SYKALDH1A1POLB
SCHEMBL10043697 0.80 SYK (0.43) SYKRAF1BRAFPOLB
SCHEMBL10043751 0.80 SYK (0.53) SYKRAF1BRAF
SCHEMBL10043951 0.80 SYK (0.51) SYKRAF1BRAF

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8106068-B2 Compositions and methods for modulating c-kit and PDGFR receptors IRM LLC (BM) 2012-01-31 US disclosed
US-20100081656-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR MODULATING C-KIT AND PDGFR RECEPTORS IRM LLC (BM) 2010-04-01 US disclosed
US-7678792-B2 Compositions and methods for modulating c-kit and PDGFR receptors IRM LLC (BM) 2010-03-16 US disclosed
US-20080176846-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR MODULATING C-KIT AND PDGFR RECEPTORS IRM LLC (BM) 2008-07-24 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20080176846-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR MODULATING C-KIT AND PDGFR RECEPTORS FYN, FLT3, SRC SYK 42/4885DGAT1 4811/4885NTRK1 138/4885
US-20100081656-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR MODULATING C-KIT AND PDGFR RECEPTORS FYN, FLT3, SRC SYK 42/4885DGAT1 4811/4885NTRK1 138/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.