SCHEMBL10135487

SCHEMBL10135487

CCCCN(c1nc(NCCCN(CCCCN(CCCNc2nc(N(CCCC)C3CC(C)(C)N(C)C(C)(C)C3)nc(N(CCCC)C3CC(C)(C)N(C)C(C)(C)C3)n2)CCCNc2nc(N(CCCC)C3CC(C)(C)N(C)C(C)(C)C3)nc(N(CCCC)C3CC(C)(C)N(C)C(C)(C)C3)n2)CCCNc2nc(N(CCCC)C3CC(C)(C)N(C)C(C)(C)C3)nc(N(CCCC)C3CC(C)(C)N(C)C(C)(C)C3)n2)nc(N(CCCC)C2CC(C)(C)N(C)C(C)(C)C2)n1)C1CC(C)(C)N(C)C(C)(C)C1

nearest known ligand 0.35

Predicted protein targets (top 6)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
FLT3 P36888 1/20 0.35
TYRO3 Q06418 1/20 0.35
MERTK Q12866 1/20 0.35
GAS6 Q14393 1/20 0.35
NPY1R P25929 1/20 0.32
NPY5R Q15761 1/20 0.32

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL10135491 0.99 FLT3 (0.36) FLT3TYRO3MERTKGAS6NPY1R
SCHEMBL10167129 0.99 FLT3 (0.35) FLT3TYRO3MERTKGAS6NPY1R
SCHEMBL13415259 0.98 FLT3 (0.35) FLT3TYRO3MERTKGAS6NPY1R
SCHEMBL13415263 0.98 FLT3 (0.35) FLT3TYRO3MERTKGAS6NPY1R
SCHEMBL13415265 0.98 FLT3 (0.35) FLT3TYRO3MERTKGAS6NPY1R
SCHEMBL10135486 0.98 FLT3 (0.35) FLT3TYRO3MERTKGAS6NPY1R
SCHEMBL10135472 0.98 FLT3 (0.35) FLT3TYRO3MERTKGAS6NPY1R
SCHEMBL13415268 0.97 FLT3 (0.36) FLT3TYRO3MERTKGAS6NPY1R
SCHEMBL10135534 0.94 FLT3 (0.32) FLT3TYRO3MERTKGAS6NPY1R
SCHEMBL10135467 0.94 FLT3 (0.32) FLT3TYRO3MERTKGAS6NPY1R

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8354529-B2 Polyamine derivative and polyol derivative BASF SE (DE) 2013-01-15 US disclosed
US-8354529-B2 Polyamine derivative and polyol derivative BASF SE (DE) 2013-01-15 US disclosed
US-20120053270-A1 POLYAMINE DERIVATIVE AND POLYOL DERIVATIVE MITA NARUYOSHI (JP) 2012-03-01 US disclosed
US-20120053270-A1 POLYAMINE DERIVATIVE AND POLYOL DERIVATIVE MITA NARUYOSHI (JP) 2012-03-01 US disclosed
US-8076478-B2 Stabilizer; photostability, heat resistance, ozone resistance, oxidation resistance, electromagnetic resistance BASF SE (DE) 2011-12-13 US disclosed
US-20080230743-A1 Polyamine Derivative and Polyol Derivative CIBA CORPORATION 2008-09-25 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120053270-A1 POLYAMINE DERIVATIVE AND POLYOL DERIVATIVE H1-0, H1-3, NPM1 FLT3 718/4885TYRO3 712/4885MERTK 1830/4885
US-20080230743-A1 Polyamine Derivative and Polyol Derivative H1-0, H1-3, H1-2 FLT3 761/4885TYRO3 1579/4885MERTK 2524/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.