SCHEMBL1102567

SCHEMBL1102567

c1ccc(-c2c3ccccc3c(-c3ccccn3)c3cnccc23)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.51

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CYP2A6 P11509 1/20 0.51
KDM4E B2RXH2 4/20 0.42
METAP1 P53582 3/20 0.42
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.42
CCR1 P32246 2/20 0.42
CCR5 P51681 2/20 0.42
CCR8 P51685 2/20 0.42
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.42
POLB P06746 1/20 0.42
BLM P54132 1/20 0.42
HIF1A Q16665 1/20 0.42
DOHH Q9BU89 1/20 0.42
P4HTM Q9NXG6 1/20 0.42
NPY5R Q15761 1/20 0.41
TGFBR1 P36897 1/20 0.41
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 5/20 0.40
TP53 P04637 5/20 0.40
NPC1 O15118 4/20 0.40
RAB9A P51151 4/20 0.40
PKM P14618 3/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1102564 0.91 KDM4E (0.50) CYP2A6KDM4EMETAP1LMNACCR1
SCHEMBL12655787 0.88 KDM4E (0.54) CYP2A6KDM4EMETAP1LMNACCR1
SCHEMBL1102490 0.88 TNF (0.48) CYP2A6KDM4ECYP1A2POLBSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL1102806 0.86 TNF (0.47) CYP2A6KDM4ECYP1A2POLBSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL1102798 0.86 TNF (0.47) CYP2A6KDM4ECYP1A2POLBSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL1102900 0.86 TNF (0.47) CYP2A6KDM4ECYP1A2POLBSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL1102677 0.86 TNF (0.47) CYP2A6KDM4ECYP1A2POLBSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL1102728 0.84 NOTUM (0.48) CYP2A6KDM4ECYP1A2SMN1; SMN2TNF
SCHEMBL1102483 0.84 NOTUM (0.48) CYP2A6KDM4ECYP1A2SMN1; SMN2TNF
SCHEMBL1102793 0.84 NOTUM (0.48) CYP2A6KDM4ECYP1A2SMN1; SMN2TNF

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8153279-B2 Organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2012-04-10 US disclosed
US-8153279-B2 Organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2012-04-10 US disclosed
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-02-11 US disclosed
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-02-11 US disclosed
EP-2147962-A1 Azaanthracene-derivatives and organic electroluminescent device using the same Gracel Display Inc. (KR) 2010-01-27 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same ORMDL3, OCIAD2, OCIAD1 CYP2A6 1911/4885KDM4E 3367/4885METAP1 4779/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.