SCHEMBL1102901

SCHEMBL1102901

c1ccc2c(c1)Oc1ccccc1N2c1c2ccccc2c(N2c3ccccc3Oc3ccccc32)c2ncccc12

nearest known ligand 0.38

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HTT P42858 5/20 0.38
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 5/20 0.36
KDM4E B2RXH2 5/20 0.36
MPI P34949 1/20 0.36
HSP90AA1 P07900 3/20 0.34
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.34
PARP1 P09874 3/20 0.34
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.34
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.34
GAA P10253 1/20 0.34
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.34
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.34
P2RX4 Q99571 1/20 0.33
MAPT P10636 4/20 0.33
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.33
BRD4 O60885 1/20 0.33
METAP2 P50579 1/20 0.33
METAP1 P53582 1/20 0.33
HSP90AB1 P08238 1/20 0.33
IDO1 P14902 1/20 0.33

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1103072 0.86 HTT (0.33) HTTL3MBTL1KDM4EMPICYP1A2
SCHEMBL1103240 0.82 KDM4E (0.37) HTTKDM4EHSP90AA1NPC1CYP1A2
SCHEMBL1103182 0.80 AKT1 (0.36) KDM4ECYP1A2CYP3A4GAAHPGD
SCHEMBL20837195 0.80 P2RX4 (0.39) P2RX4MAPTSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL1102797 0.79 HTT (0.38) HTTL3MBTL1KDM4EMPIHSP90AA1
SCHEMBL1103025 0.79 KDM4E (0.37) HTTL3MBTL1KDM4EMPIHSP90AA1
SCHEMBL1102903 0.79 KDM4E (0.43) HTTL3MBTL1KDM4EMPIHSP90AA1
SCHEMBL1102977 0.79 HTT (0.38) HTTL3MBTL1KDM4EMPIHSP90AA1
SCHEMBL1102807 0.79 HSP90AA1 (0.36) HTTL3MBTL1KDM4EMPIHSP90AA1
SCHEMBL1102983 0.78 KMT2A (0.40) HTTL3MBTL1HSP90AA1NPC1CYP1A2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8153279-B2 Organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2012-04-10 US disclosed
US-8153279-B2 Organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2012-04-10 US disclosed
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-02-11 US disclosed
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-02-11 US disclosed
EP-2147962-A1 Azaanthracene-derivatives and organic electroluminescent device using the same Gracel Display Inc. (KR) 2010-01-27 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same ORMDL3, OCIAD2, OCIAD1 HTT 4390/4885L3MBTL1 1629/4885KDM4E 3367/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.