SCHEMBL1103558

SCHEMBL1103558

c1ccc(-c2ccc(-c3c4ccccc4c(-c4cccc5ccccc45)c4c3cnc3ccccc34)cc2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.42

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MAPT P10636 3/20 0.42
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 3/20 0.42
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.42
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.42
RECQL P46063 1/20 0.42
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.42
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.40
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.40
HPGD P15428 2/20 0.40
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.40
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.40
NFKB1 P19838 1/20 0.40
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.40
NFKB2 Q00653 1/20 0.40
RELA Q04206 1/20 0.40
ATM Q13315 1/20 0.40
HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.40
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.40
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.40
ESR1 P03372 3/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1103469 0.99 MAPT (0.41) MAPTSMN1; SMN2NPC1LMNARECQL
SCHEMBL1103451 0.97 MAPT (0.42) MAPTSMN1; SMN2NPC1LMNARECQL
SCHEMBL1103466 0.97 KDM4E (0.41) MAPTSMN1; SMN2NPC1LMNARECQL
SCHEMBL1103487 0.95 MAPT (0.42) MAPTSMN1; SMN2NPC1LMNARECQL
SCHEMBL1103571 0.94 MAPT (0.40) MAPTSMN1; SMN2NPC1LMNARECQL
SCHEMBL1103564 0.93 KDM4E (0.40) MAPTSMN1; SMN2NPC1LMNARECQL
SCHEMBL1103563 0.92 MAPT (0.40) MAPTSMN1; SMN2NPC1LMNARECQL
SCHEMBL1103476 0.92 ESR1 (0.41) MAPTSMN1; SMN2NPC1LMNARECQL
SCHEMBL1103573 0.92 MAPT (0.40) MAPTSMN1; SMN2NPC1LMNARECQL
SCHEMBL1103561 0.92 MAPT (0.40) MAPTSMN1; SMN2NPC1LMNARECQL

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8153279-B2 Organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2012-04-10 US disclosed
US-8153279-B2 Organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2012-04-10 US disclosed
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-02-11 US disclosed
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-02-11 US disclosed
EP-2147962-A1 Azaanthracene-derivatives and organic electroluminescent device using the same Gracel Display Inc. (KR) 2010-01-27 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same ORMDL3, OCIAD2, OCIAD1 MAPT 3162/4885SMN1; SMN2 4091/4885NPC1 1582/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.