SCHEMBL12271759

SCHEMBL12271759

CC(C)(C)OC(=O)NCCC(Nc1cccc(-c2cnc3c(NC4CCC(NC(=O)OC(C)(C)C)CC4)nccn23)n1)c1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.63

Predicted protein targets (top 5)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ FLT3 P36888 8/20 0.63
▸ TTK P33981 9/20 0.43
▸ MAPK8 P45983 2/20 0.38
▸ MAST3 O60307 1/20 0.38
▸ MAPK9 P45984 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL12525554 1.00 FLT3 (0.63) FLT3TTKMAPK8MAST3MAPK9
SCHEMBL12522942 0.97 FLT3 (0.63) FLT3TTKMAPK8MAST3MAPK9
SCHEMBL12272792 0.93 FLT3 (0.61) FLT3TTKMAPK8MAST3MAPK9
SCHEMBL12525551 0.93 FLT3 (0.61) FLT3TTKMAPK8MAST3MAPK9
SCHEMBL12272782 0.92 FLT3 (0.52) FLT3TTKMAPK8MAPK9
SCHEMBL12524749 0.92 FLT3 (0.52) FLT3TTKMAPK8MAPK9
SCHEMBL12522908 0.90 FLT3 (0.60) FLT3TTKMAPK8MAST3MAPK9
SCHEMBL12524765 0.85 FLT3 (0.50) FLT3TTKMAPK8MAPK9
SCHEMBL12273040 0.85 FLT3 (0.50) FLT3TTKMAPK8MAPK9
SCHEMBL12522788 0.83 FLT3 (0.72) FLT3TTKMAPK8MAPK9

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2686319-B1 IMIDAZO PYRAZINES HOFFMANN LA ROCHE (CH) 2016-07-13 — — EP disclosed
US-8673905-B2 Imidazo pyrazines HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. (US) 2014-03-18 — — US disclosed
EP-2686319-A1 IMIDAZO PYRAZINES F.HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2014-01-22 — — EP disclosed
US-20120238564-A1 IMIDAZO PYRAZINES LUK KIN-CHUN (US) 2012-09-20 — — US disclosed
WO-2012123470-A1 IMIDAZO PYRAZINES F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2012-09-20 — — WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120238564-A1 IMIDAZO PYRAZINES THPO, MCL1, IKZF3 FLT3 5/4885TTK 2825/4885MAPK8 3036/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback