SCHEMBL16922582

SCHEMBL16922582

c1ccc(-c2nc(-c3ccccc3)nc(-c3ccc4oc5ccc(-c6ncnc7c6sc6ccccc67)cc5c4c3)n2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.46

Predicted protein targets (top 11)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ LIMK1 P53667 11/20 0.46
▸ CDK5 Q00535 1/20 0.44
▸ CDK5R1 Q15078 1/20 0.44
▸ PIK3CA P42336 1/20 0.41
▸ EGFR P00533 4/20 0.40
▸ HTR2C P28335 1/20 0.40
▸ HRH4 Q9H3N8 1/20 0.40
▸ LIMK2 P53671 2/20 0.36
▸ CDC7 O00311 1/20 0.36
▸ CLK1 P49759 1/20 0.36
▸ DBF4 Q9UBU7 1/20 0.36

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL16922313 0.92 LIMK1 (0.46) LIMK1CDK5CDK5R1PIK3CAEGFR
SCHEMBL16922360 0.92 LIMK1 (0.51) LIMK1CDK5CDK5R1PIK3CAEGFR
SCHEMBL16922598 0.91 LIMK1 (0.51) LIMK1CDK5CDK5R1PIK3CAEGFR
SCHEMBL16922296 0.90 LIMK1 (0.40) LIMK1CDK5CDK5R1PIK3CAEGFR
SCHEMBL17427851 0.90 LIMK1 (0.53) LIMK1CDK5CDK5R1PIK3CAEGFR
SCHEMBL16922297 0.90 LIMK1 (0.47) LIMK1CDK5CDK5R1PIK3CAEGFR
SCHEMBL16922535 0.90 LIMK1 (0.49) LIMK1CDK5CDK5R1PIK3CAEGFR
SCHEMBL16922534 0.90 LIMK1 (0.49) LIMK1CDK5CDK5R1PIK3CAEGFR
SCHEMBL16922300 0.89 LIMK1 (0.42) LIMK1CDK5CDK5R1PIK3CAEGFR
SCHEMBL16922544 0.88 LIMK1 (0.46) LIMK1CDK5CDK5R1PIK3CAEGFR

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-9755159-B2 Organic materials for OLEDs UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORPORATION (US) 2017-09-05 — — US disclosed
US-20150207082-A1 ORGANIC MATERIALS FOR OLEDS UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORPORATION (US) 2015-07-23 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20150207082-A1 ORGANIC MATERIALS FOR OLEDS OCIAD1, OCIAD2, SLC25A21 LIMK1 4180/4885CDK5 1881/4885CDK5R1 2734/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback