SCHEMBL17898209

SCHEMBL17898209

O=C(CCc1nccc(C2CCCN(C(=O)c3cc(F)cc(F)c3)C2)n1)N1CCCC1

nearest known ligand 0.46

Predicted protein targets (top 3)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PROKR1 Q8TCW9 16/20 0.46
NAMPT P43490 2/20 0.42
MAP3K12 Q12852 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL17898200 0.87 PROKR1 (0.45) PROKR1NAMPTMAP3K12
SCHEMBL17898205 0.82 PROKR1 (0.46) PROKR1MAP3K12
SCHEMBL17898201 0.69 PDE2A (0.45)
SCHEMBL4146730 0.65 MAP3K12 (0.44) PROKR1MAP3K12
SCHEMBL28769750 0.65 PROKR1 (0.52) PROKR1NAMPTMAP3K12
SCHEMBL30796556 0.64 GRM5 (0.55) PROKR1NAMPT
SCHEMBL3587216 0.64 GRM5 (0.55) PROKR1NAMPT
SCHEMBL3587220 0.64 GRM5 (0.55) PROKR1NAMPT
SCHEMBL16446487 0.63 PROKR1 (0.79) PROKR1
SCHEMBL16446410 0.63 PROKR1 (0.79) PROKR1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-10562883-B2 Heterocycles capable of modulating T-cell responses, and methods of using same NOGRA PHARMA LIMITED (IE) 2020-02-18 US disclosed
US-10208017-B2 Heterocycles capable of modulating T-cell responses, and methods of using same NOGRA PHARMA LIMITED (IE) 2019-02-19 US disclosed
US-20160194303-A1 HETEROCYCLES CAPABLE OF MODULATING T-CELL RESPONSES, AND METHODS OF USING SAME NOGRA PHARMA LIMITED (IE) 2016-07-07 US disclosed
US-20160194303-A1 HETEROCYCLES CAPABLE OF MODULATING T-CELL RESPONSES, AND METHODS OF USING SAME NOGRA PHARMA LIMITED (IE) 2016-07-07 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (3 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20160194303-A1 HETEROCYCLES CAPABLE OF MODULATING T-CELL RESPONSES, AND METHODS OF USING SAME ICOS, NFATC1, CD74 PROKR1 2669/4885NAMPT 1273/4885MAP3K12 1704/4885
US-10562883-B2 Heterocycles capable of modulating T-cell responses, and methods of using same ICOS, NFATC1, CD74 PROKR1 2669/4885NAMPT 1273/4885MAP3K12 1704/4885
US-10208017-B2 Heterocycles capable of modulating T-cell responses, and methods of using same ICOS, NFATC1, CD74 PROKR1 2669/4885NAMPT 1273/4885MAP3K12 1704/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.