SCHEMBL1961077

SCHEMBL1961077

Cc1c2ccc(N(C)c3ccnc(N(c4ccc5c(C)n(C)nc5c4)c4ccnc(Cl)n4)n3)cc2nn1C

nearest known ligand 0.60

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDR P35968 16/20 0.60
KIT P10721 9/20 0.60
PDGFRA P16234 9/20 0.60
HDAC1 Q13547 4/20 0.51
HDAC6 Q9UBN7 4/20 0.51
HDAC3 O15379 2/20 0.51
HDAC4 P56524 2/20 0.51
HDAC7 Q8WUI4 2/20 0.51
HDAC2 Q92769 2/20 0.51
HDAC10 Q969S8 2/20 0.51
HDAC11 Q96DB2 2/20 0.51
HDAC8 Q9BY41 2/20 0.51
HDAC9 Q9UKV0 2/20 0.51
HDAC5 Q9UQL6 2/20 0.51
FLT1 P17948 3/20 0.50
ABCB11 O95342 2/20 0.50
CYP3A4 P08684 2/20 0.50
CYP2D6 P10635 2/20 0.50
CYP2C9 P11712 2/20 0.50
CYP2C19 P33261 2/20 0.50

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL18101235 0.96 KDR (0.56) KDRKITPDGFRAHDAC1HDAC6
SCHEMBL589205 0.92 KDR (0.68) KDRKITPDGFRAHDAC1HDAC6
SCHEMBL29516846 0.85 KDR (0.67) KDRKITPDGFRAHDAC1HDAC6
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL29516748 0.84 KDR (0.66) KDRKITPDGFRAHDAC1HDAC6
SCHEMBL11953494 0.84 KDR (0.66) KDRKITPDGFRAHDAC1HDAC6
SCHEMBL23587599 0.83 KDR (0.56) KDRKITPDGFRAHDAC1HDAC6
SCHEMBL14347685 0.81 KDR (0.67) KDRKITPDGFRAHDAC1HDAC6
SCHEMBL20729864 0.79 KDR (0.65) KDRKITPDGFRAHDAC1HDAC6
SCHEMBL13849112 0.79 KDR (0.65) KDRKITPDGFRAHDAC1HDAC6
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL30817650 0.78 KDR (0.64) KDRKITPDGFRAHDAC1HDAC6

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20120197019-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND PROCESSES GLAXO WELLCOME MANUFACTURING PTE LTD (SG) 2012-08-02 US disclosed
US-20120197019-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND PROCESSES GLAXO WELLCOME MANUFACTURING PTE LTD (SG) 2012-08-02 US disclosed
WO-2011069053-A1 PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF PAZOPANIP HCL AND CRYSTALLINE FORMS OF PAZOPANIB HCL TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. (IL) 2011-06-09 WO disclosed
WO-2011050159-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND PROCESSES GLAXO WELLCOME MANUFACTURING PTE LTD (SG) 2011-04-28 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120197019-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND PROCESSES PIK3CA, PNP, PIK3CB KDR 9/4885KIT 1655/4885PDGFRA 40/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.