SCHEMBL19731855

SCHEMBL19731855

CC(=O)OC1C(OCc2ccccc2)[C@H](OCc2ccccc2)C(COCc2ccccc2)O[C@@H]1OC1C(OCc2ccccc2)[C@H](OCc2ccccc2)C(COCc2ccccc2)O[C@@H]1OC1C(OCc2ccccc2)[C@H](OCc2ccccc2)C(COCc2ccccc2)O[C@@H]1F

nearest known ligand 0.51

Predicted protein targets (top 13)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ NT5E P21589 1/20 0.49
▸ PTPN1 P18031 11/20 0.48
▸ PTPN2 P17706 5/20 0.48
▸ PTPN11 Q06124 5/20 0.48
▸ CDC25B P30305 8/20 0.47
▸ PTPN6 P29350 4/20 0.45
▸ GJB2 P29033 2/20 0.45
▸ SSTR1 P30872 1/20 0.44
▸ SSTR2 P30874 1/20 0.44
▸ SSTR4 P31391 1/20 0.44
▸ SSTR3 P32745 1/20 0.44
▸ SSTR5 P35346 1/20 0.44
▸ TACR2 P21452 2/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL19731873 1.00 NT5E (0.49) NT5EPTPN1PTPN2PTPN11CDC25B
SCHEMBL22677462 0.91 NT5E (0.50) NT5EPTPN1PTPN2PTPN11CDC25B
SCHEMBL22677737 0.91 NT5E (0.50) NT5EPTPN1PTPN2PTPN11CDC25B
SCHEMBL12871701 0.88 NT5E (0.47) NT5EPTPN1PTPN2PTPN11CDC25B
SCHEMBL14365863 0.88 NT5E (0.47) NT5EPTPN1PTPN2PTPN11CDC25B
SCHEMBL14365870 0.88 NT5E (0.47) NT5EPTPN1PTPN2PTPN11CDC25B
SCHEMBL8055015 0.88 NT5E (0.51) NT5EPTPN1PTPN2PTPN11CDC25B
SCHEMBL8055010 0.88 NT5E (0.51) NT5EPTPN1PTPN2PTPN11CDC25B
SCHEMBL9009910 0.88 NT5E (0.51) NT5EPTPN1PTPN2PTPN11CDC25B
SCHEMBL8227941 0.87 NT5E (0.59) NT5EPTPN1PTPN2PTPN11CDC25B

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-10336784-B2 Methods for modular synthesis of N-glycans and arrays thereof ACADEMIA SINICA (TW) 2019-07-02 — — US disclosed
US-20170362265-A1 METHODS FOR MODULAR SYNTHESIS OF N-GLYCANS AND ARRAYS THEREOF ACADEMIA SINICA (TW) 2017-12-21 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20170362265-A1 METHODS FOR MODULAR SYNTHESIS OF N-GLYCANS AND ARRAYS THEREOF SIGLEC7, SIGLEC9, CD4 NT5E 314/4885PTPN1 185/4885PTPN2 210/4885
US-10336784-B2 Methods for modular synthesis of N-glycans and arrays thereof SIGLEC7, SIGLEC9, CD4 NT5E 314/4885PTPN1 185/4885PTPN2 210/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback