SCHEMBL22760820

SCHEMBL22760820

N#Cc1cccc(-c2ccc3c4ccccc4n(-c4c(-c5cccc(C#N)c5)ccc(-n5c6cc(-c7cccc(C#N)c7)ccc6c6c(-c7ccc(-c8ccc9c(c8)c8cc(-c%10ccccc%10C#N)ccc8n9-c8c(-c9cccc(C#N)c9)ccc(-n9c%10ccc(-c%11ccccc%11C#N)cc%10c%10cc(-c%11ccccc%11C#N)ccc%109)c8C#N)c(C#N)c7)cccc65)c4C#N)c3c2)c1

nearest known ligand 0.33

Predicted protein targets (top 5)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
GRIN1 Q05586 1/20 0.33
GRIN2B Q13224 1/20 0.33
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.31
HIF1A Q16665 1/20 0.31
PDK2 Q15119 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL22761170 0.91 SMN1; SMN2 (0.37) GRIN1GRIN2BSMN1; SMN2HIF1APDK2
SCHEMBL22761173 0.91 SMN1; SMN2 (0.34) GRIN1GRIN2BSMN1; SMN2HIF1APDK2
SCHEMBL22760819 0.88 SMN1; SMN2 (0.39) GRIN1GRIN2BSMN1; SMN2HIF1APDK2
SCHEMBL22760934 0.87 STS (0.35) SMN1; SMN2HIF1APDK2
SCHEMBL22760933 0.87 STS (0.35) GRIN1GRIN2BSMN1; SMN2HIF1APDK2
SCHEMBL22760968 0.86
SCHEMBL22760693 0.86 CHEK1 (0.37) HIF1APDK2
SCHEMBL21546968 0.84 CHEK1 (0.36) HIF1APDK2
SCHEMBL21546966 0.84 CHEK1 (0.36) SMN1; SMN2HIF1APDK2
SCHEMBL19917591 0.83 GRIN1 (0.33) GRIN1GRIN2BSMN1; SMN2HIF1APDK2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-10981930-B2 Organic molecules for use in optoelectronic devices CYNORA GMBH (DE) 2021-04-20 US disclosed
US-20200385399-A1 ORGANIC MOLECULES FOR USE IN OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICES SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD. (KR) 2020-12-10 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-10981930-B2 Organic molecules for use in optoelectronic devices OR10J3, OR51E2, EPCAM GRIN1 1702/4885GRIN2B 605/4885SMN1; SMN2 4427/4885
US-20200385399-A1 ORGANIC MOLECULES FOR USE IN OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICES OR10J3, OR51E2, EPCAM GRIN1 1702/4885GRIN2B 605/4885SMN1; SMN2 4427/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.