SCHEMBL2808489

SCHEMBL2808489

Cn1nc(C(=O)NCc2ccc(OC(C)(C)C(=O)O)cc2)cc1-c1ccc(C(C)(C)C)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.77

Predicted protein targets (top 3)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PPARG P37231 20/20 0.77
PPARA Q07869 16/20 0.77
PPARD Q03181 9/20 0.70

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4689835 0.89 PPARG (0.65) PPARGPPARAPPARD
SCHEMBL2811302 0.87 PPARG (1.00) PPARGPPARAPPARD
SCHEMBL4692405 0.87 PPARG (0.80) PPARGPPARAPPARD
SCHEMBL5100836 0.86 PPARG (0.61) PPARGPPARAPPARD
SCHEMBL2808248 0.83 PPARA (1.00) PPARGPPARAPPARD
SCHEMBL4689579 0.79 PPARG (1.00) PPARGPPARAPPARD
SCHEMBL18644965 0.79 PPARG (0.71) PPARGPPARAPPARD
SCHEMBL4689934 0.78 PPARG (0.85) PPARGPPARAPPARD
SCHEMBL4692383 0.78 PPARG (0.82) PPARGPPARAPPARD
SCHEMBL4692677 0.78 PPARG (0.67) PPARGPPARAPPARD

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 13 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1685113-B1 SUBSTITUTED PYRAZOLES AS PPAR AGONISTS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP (US) 2008-07-30 EP claimed
JP-2007511485-A 2007-05-10 JP claimed
EP-1685113-A1 SUBSTITUTED PYRAZOLES AS PPAR AGONISTS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2006-08-02 EP claimed
WO-2005049578-A1 SUBSTITUTED PYRAZOLES AS PPAR AGONISTS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2005-06-02 WO claimed
US-20110300129-A1 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCING VACCINE EFFICACY UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER (US) 2011-12-08 US disclosed
WO-2010075037-A1 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCING VACCINE EFFICACY UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER (US) 2010-07-01 WO disclosed
EP-1685113-B1 SUBSTITUTED PYRAZOLES AS PPAR AGONISTS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP (US) 2008-07-30 EP disclosed
EP-1685113-B1 SUBSTITUTED PYRAZOLES AS PPAR AGONISTS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP (US) 2008-07-30 EP disclosed
US-20080021030-A1 Substituted Pyrazoles As Ppar Agonists SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION 2008-01-24 US disclosed
US-20080021030-A1 Substituted Pyrazoles As Ppar Agonists SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION 2008-01-24 US disclosed
US-20080021030-A1 Substituted Pyrazoles As Ppar Agonists SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION 2008-01-24 US disclosed
EP-1685113-A1 SUBSTITUTED PYRAZOLES AS PPAR AGONISTS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2006-08-02 EP disclosed
WO-2005049578-A1 SUBSTITUTED PYRAZOLES AS PPAR AGONISTS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2005-06-02 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20080021030-A1 Substituted Pyrazoles As Ppar Agonists PPARD, PPARA, PPARG PPARG 3/4885PPARA 2/4885PPARD 1/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.