SCHEMBL2816282

SCHEMBL2816282

Nc1nc2ccccc2n2c(-c3ccc(F)cc3)cnc12

nearest known ligand 0.48

Predicted protein targets (top 18)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.48
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.48
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.48
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.48
ADORA2A P29274 7/20 0.44
ADORA1 P30542 4/20 0.44
ADORA3 P0DMS8 4/20 0.44
FLT3 P36888 1/20 0.40
TLR7 Q9NYK1 3/20 0.40
NOD1 Q9Y239 2/20 0.39
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.39
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.39
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.39
POLB P06746 1/20 0.39
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.39
GRIA1 P42261 1/20 0.39
CACNG8 Q8WXS5 1/20 0.39
CACNG2 Q9Y698 1/20 0.39

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2817520 0.89 ADORA2A (0.52) ALDH1A1HPGDKMT2AADORA2AADORA1
SCHEMBL2820339 0.86 ADORA2A (0.52) KMT2ASMN1; SMN2ADORA2AADORA1ADORA3
SCHEMBL2814962 0.86 ADORA2A (0.52) ALDH1A1HPGDKMT2ASMN1; SMN2ADORA2A
SCHEMBL2817247 0.86 ADORA2A (0.52) ADORA2AADORA1ADORA3
SCHEMBL2817439 0.83 ADORA2A (0.55) ALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2ADORA2AADORA1ADORA3
SCHEMBL2819637 0.83 ADORA2A (0.55) ALDH1A1HPGDSMN1; SMN2ADORA2AADORA1
SCHEMBL2817187 0.82 ADORA2A (0.43) KMT2ASMN1; SMN2ADORA2AADORA1ADORA3
SCHEMBL2815475 0.81 ADORA2A (0.57) ALDH1A1KMT2AADORA2AADORA1ADORA3
SCHEMBL2816757 0.81 ADORA2A (0.58) HPGDKMT2ASMN1; SMN2ADORA2AADORA1
SCHEMBL2818464 0.81 HTR2C (0.47) ALDH1A1HPGDKMT2ASMN1; SMN2FLT3

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2205602-B1 IMIDAZO[1,2-A]QUINOXALINES AND DERIVATIVES THEREOF FOR TREATING CANCERS UNIV MONTPELLIER (FR) 2018-09-26 EP claimed
US-8378098-B2 Imidazol[1,2-α]quinoxalines and derivatives for the treatment of cancers UNIVERSITE DE MONTPELLIER I (FR) 2013-02-19 US claimed
EP-2205602-B1 IMIDAZO[1,2-A]QUINOXALINES AND DERIVATIVES THEREOF FOR TREATING CANCERS UNIV MONTPELLIER (FR) 2018-09-26 EP disclosed
US-8378098-B2 Imidazol[1,2-α]quinoxalines and derivatives for the treatment of cancers UNIVERSITE DE MONTPELLIER I (FR) 2013-02-19 US disclosed
US-20100249142-A1 IMIDAZOL[1,2-alpha]QUINOXALINES AND DERIVATIVES FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCERS UNIVERSITE DE MONTPELLIER I 2010-09-30 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100249142-A1 IMIDAZOL[1,2-alpha]QUINOXALINES AND DERIVATIVES FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCERS IDH3A, NRAS, KRAS ALDH1A1 657/4885HPGD 222/4885KMT2A 998/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.