SCHEMBL2907158

SCHEMBL2907158

Cc1cccc(CN2CCN(C(=O)C=Cc3ccccc3Cl)CC2)c1

nearest known ligand 0.71

Predicted protein targets (top 12)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
F2R P25116 1/20 0.71
MAPT P10636 2/20 0.60
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.60
ALDH1A1 P00352 4/20 0.59
HTT P42858 3/20 0.59
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.57
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.57
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.56
FAAH O00519 1/20 0.55
APP P05067 1/20 0.54
GPR183 P32249 3/20 0.53
ACHE P22303 1/20 0.52

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2906086 0.90 F2R (0.72) F2RMAPTL3MBTL1ALDH1A1HTT
SCHEMBL2906392 0.90 F2R (0.79) F2RMAPTL3MBTL1ALDH1A1HTT
SCHEMBL10300780 0.90 F2R (0.82) F2RMAPTL3MBTL1ALDH1A1HTT
SCHEMBL2909314 0.88 F2R (0.80) F2RMAPTL3MBTL1ALDH1A1MEN1
SCHEMBL2908715 0.85 KMT2A (0.70) F2RMAPTL3MBTL1ALDH1A1HTT
SCHEMBL2903103 0.85 F2R (0.82) F2RMAPTL3MBTL1ALDH1A1HTT
SCHEMBL16598998 0.84 MEN1 (0.68) MAPTL3MBTL1ALDH1A1HTTMEN1
SCHEMBL16598995 0.84 MEN1 (0.68) MAPTL3MBTL1ALDH1A1HTTMEN1
SCHEMBL2905717 0.83 F2R (0.80) F2RMAPTL3MBTL1MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL2908871 0.83 F2R (1.00) F2RMAPTL3MBTL1MEN1KMT2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20120232097-A1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR-1 ANTAGONISTS PEREZ MICHEL (FR) 2012-09-13 US claimed
EP-2041104-B1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR- I ANTAGONISTS PF MEDICAMENT (FR) 2010-08-18 EP claimed
US-20090176803-A1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR-1 ANTAGONISTS PIERRE FABRE MEDICAMENT (FR) 2009-07-09 US claimed
EP-2041104-A1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR- I ANTAGONISTS Pierre Fabre Medicament (FR) 2009-04-01 EP claimed
WO-2007147824-A1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR- I ANTAGONISTS PIERRE FABRE MEDICAMENT (FR) 2007-12-27 WO claimed
EP-2041104-B1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR- I ANTAGONISTS PF MEDICAMENT (FR) 2010-08-18 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090176803-A1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR-1 ANTAGONISTS F2R, F2RL1, F2RL3 F2R 1/4885MAPT 4777/4885L3MBTL1 2597/4885
US-20120232097-A1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR-1 ANTAGONISTS F2R, F2RL1, F2RL3 F2R 1/4885MAPT 4777/4885L3MBTL1 2597/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.