SCHEMBL3329110

SCHEMBL3329110

COc1nnc(C)c(-c2ccc3ccccc3c2)c1-c1c(F)cccc1Cl

nearest known ligand 0.40

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.40
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.40
HTT P42858 1/20 0.40
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.40
ORAI1 Q96D31 2/20 0.38
PDE2A O00408 4/20 0.38
PDE10A Q9Y233 4/20 0.38
RAC1 P63000 2/20 0.36
FABP3 P05413 1/20 0.36
FABP4 P15090 1/20 0.36
FABP5 Q01469 1/20 0.36
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.35
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.35
TEK Q02763 1/20 0.35
MAPK10 P53779 1/20 0.34
PTGES O14684 2/20 0.34
IKBKB O14920 1/20 0.34
ABL1 P00519 1/20 0.34
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.34
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.33

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3334028 0.89 SMN1; SMN2 (0.45) LMNAMAPK1HTTSMN1; SMN2ORAI1
SCHEMBL3331310 0.83 RAC1 (0.39) SMN1; SMN2PDE2APDE10ARAC1MEN1
SCHEMBL3338724 0.83 RAC1 (0.39) SMN1; SMN2PDE10ARAC1MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL13165374 0.72 NPC1 (0.44) LMNAMAPK1HTTSMN1; SMN2PDE2A
SCHEMBL12394014 0.71 MEN1 (0.49) LMNAMAPK1PDE2APDE10AMEN1
SCHEMBL3333863 0.71 IKBKB (0.38) SMN1; SMN2RAC1KMT2AMAPK10IKBKB
SCHEMBL3575097 0.71 NPC1 (0.39) ORAI1PDE2APDE10AMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL3331683 0.71 CYP1A2 (0.43) SMN1; SMN2RAC1IKBKBCYP2C9
SCHEMBL3311845 0.70 NPC1 (0.42) LMNAMAPK1HTTSMN1; SMN2PDE2A
SCHEMBL3310669 0.70 KDM4E (0.37) SMN1; SMN2ORAI1PDE2APDE10AMEN1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20100144674-A1 PYRIDAZINE DERIVATIVES SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, INC. (US) 2010-06-10 US claimed
EP-2077997-A1 PYRIDAZINE DERIVATIVES Syngeta Participations AG (CH) 2009-07-15 EP claimed
WO-2008049585-A1 PYRIDAZINE DERIVATIVES SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) 2008-05-02 WO claimed
US-20100144674-A1 PYRIDAZINE DERIVATIVES SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, INC. (US) 2010-06-10 US disclosed
EP-2077997-A1 PYRIDAZINE DERIVATIVES Syngeta Participations AG (CH) 2009-07-15 EP disclosed
WO-2008049585-A1 PYRIDAZINE DERIVATIVES SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) 2008-05-02 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100144674-A1 PYRIDAZINE DERIVATIVES C3AR1, C1S, CBR3 LMNA 3400/4885MAPK1 1828/4885HTT 1885/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.