SCHEMBL5664565

SCHEMBL5664565

O=C(OC[C@H]1O[C@@H](OC(=O)c2cc(OC(=O)c3cc(O)c(O)c(O)c3)c(OC(=O)c3cc(O)c(O)c(O)c3)c(OC(=O)c3cc(O)c(O)c(O)c3)c2)[C@H](OC(=O)c2cc(O)c(O)c(OC(=O)c3cc(O)c(O)c(O)c3)c2)[C@@H](OC(=O)c2cc(O)c(O)c(O)c2)[C@@H]1OC(=O)c1cc(O)c(O)c(O)c1)c1cc(O)c(O)c(O)c1

nearest known ligand 0.92

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
USP2 O75604 2/20 0.92
MAPK1 P28482 2/20 0.92
TMPRSS2 O15393 1/20 0.92
PDE5A O76074 1/20 0.92
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.92
CA2 P00918 1/20 0.92
HMGCR P04035 1/20 0.92
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.92
LCK P06239 1/20 0.92
FYN P06241 1/20 0.92
HSPD1 P10809 1/20 0.92
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.92
CA6 P23280 1/20 0.92
TBXAS1 P24557 1/20 0.92
MAPK3 P27361 1/20 0.92
HSPE1 P61604 1/20 0.92
MAPK14 Q16539 1/20 0.92
TST Q16762 1/20 0.92
SLCO1B3 Q9NPD5 1/20 0.92
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.92

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL5663969 1.00 USP2 (0.92) USP2MAPK1TMPRSS2PDE5ACA1
SCHEMBL5665043 0.99 USP2 (0.90) USP2MAPK1TMPRSS2PDE5ACA1
SCHEMBL5664497 0.99 USP2 (0.90) USP2MAPK1TMPRSS2PDE5ACA1
SCHEMBL5664781 0.97 USP2 (0.86) USP2MAPK1TMPRSS2PDE5ACA1
SCHEMBL5663975 0.96 USP2 (0.88) USP2MAPK1TMPRSS2PDE5ACA1
SCHEMBL23630701 0.96 USP2 (1.00) USP2MAPK1TMPRSS2PDE5ACA1
Tannic Acid SCHEMBL25066810 0.96 USP2 (1.00) USP2MAPK1TMPRSS2PDE5ACA1
SCHEMBL23630709 0.96 USP2 (1.00) USP2MAPK1TMPRSS2PDE5ACA1
Tannic Acid SCHEMBL22105299 0.96 USP2 (1.00) USP2MAPK1TMPRSS2PDE5ACA1
Tannic Acid SCHEMBL21865640 0.96 USP2 (1.00) USP2MAPK1TMPRSS2PDE5ACA1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1545554-A4 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING DIABETES MELLITIS UNIV OHIO (US) 2006-06-14 EP disclosed
US-20060058243-A1 Methods and compositions for treating diabetes mellitis OHIO UNIVERSITY 2006-03-16 US disclosed
EP-1545554-A1 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING DIABETES MELLITIS Ohio University (US) 2005-06-29 EP disclosed
WO-2004009094-A1 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING DIABETES MELLITIS OHIO UNIVERSITY (US) 2004-01-29 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060058243-A1 Methods and compositions for treating diabetes mellitis IAPP, GCG, MTPN USP2 4592/4885MAPK1 1019/4885TMPRSS2 3455/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.