SCHEMBL6222070

SCHEMBL6222070

O=c1c(Br)cc2cnc(Nc3ccc(N4CCNCC4)cn3)nc2n1C1CCCC1

nearest known ligand 1.00 ✓ in ChEMBL — recovers established targets

Predicted protein targets (top 11)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CDK4 P11802 20/20 1.00
CCND1 P24385 20/20 1.00
CCND2 P30279 12/20 1.00
CCND3 P30281 12/20 1.00
CCNA2 P20248 9/20 1.00
CDK2 P24941 9/20 1.00
CCNA1 P78396 6/20 1.00
FGFR1 P11362 9/20 0.98
FGFR2 P21802 9/20 0.98
FGFR4 P22455 9/20 0.98
FGFR3 P22607 9/20 0.98

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL4441227 0.99 CDK4 (1.00) CDK4CCND1CCND2CCND3CCNA2
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL29507447 0.99 CDK4 (1.00) CDK4CCND1CCND2CCND3CCNA2
SCHEMBL4830653 0.93 CDK4 (0.86) CDK4CCND1CCND2CCND3CCNA2
SCHEMBL29507522 0.93 CDK4 (0.86) CDK4CCND1CCND2CCND3CCNA2
SCHEMBL5377679 0.93 CDK4 (0.86) CDK4CCND1CCND2CCND3CCNA2
SCHEMBL4832951 0.92 CDK4 (0.85) CDK4CCND1CCND2CCND3CCNA2
SCHEMBL30176503 0.92 CDK4 (0.85) CDK4CCND1CCND2CCND3CCNA2
SCHEMBL4825463 0.92 CDK4 (0.85) CDK4CCND1CCND2CCND3CCNA2
SCHEMBL30176505 0.92 CDK4 (0.85) CDK4CCND1CCND2CCND3CCNA2
SCHEMBL6221400 0.89 CDK4 (1.00) CDK4CCND1CCND2CCND3CCNA2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1470124-B1 2-(PYRIDIN-2-YLAMINO)-PYRIDO 2,3-d]PYRIMIDIN-7-ONES WARNER LAMBERT CO (US) 2005-12-28 EP claimed
US-20180087079-A1 METHODS OF USING CELL-CYCLE INHIBITORS TO MODULATE ONE OR MORE PROPERTIES OF A CELL CULTURE AMGEN INC. (US) 2018-03-29 US disclosed
US-20150353542-A1 METHODS OF USING CELL-CYCLE INHIBITORS TO MODULATE ONE OR MORE PROPERTIES OF A CELL CULTURE AMGEN INC. (US) 2015-12-10 US disclosed
WO-2014109858-A1 METHODS OF USING CELL-CYCLE INHIBITORS TO MODULATE ONE OR MORE PROPERTIES OF A CELL CULTURE AMGEN INC. (US) 2014-07-17 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20180087079-A1 METHODS OF USING CELL-CYCLE INHIBITORS TO MODULATE ONE OR MORE PROPERTIES OF A CELL CULTURE CDKN1A, CDC25C, CDC25B CDK4 18/4885CCND1 52/4885CCND2 61/4885
US-20150353542-A1 METHODS OF USING CELL-CYCLE INHIBITORS TO MODULATE ONE OR MORE PROPERTIES OF A CELL CULTURE CDKN1A, CDC25C, CDC25B CDK4 18/4885CCND1 52/4885CCND2 61/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.