SCHEMBL6402148

SCHEMBL6402148

COc1cc2c(cc1N(C)[C@H]1CCCN[C@H]1c1ccccc1)[C@@](C)(C(F)(F)F)OC2

nearest known ligand 0.65

Predicted protein targets (top 11)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TACR1 P25103 19/20 0.65
CYP2D6 P10635 8/20 0.65
KCNH2 Q12809 1/20 0.38
HTR1A P08908 1/20 0.38
HTR2A P28223 1/20 0.38
HTR2C P28335 1/20 0.38
HRH1 P35367 1/20 0.38
HTR2B P41595 1/20 0.38
SLC6A3 Q01959 1/20 0.38
TMEM97 Q5BJF2 1/20 0.38
SIGMAR1 Q99720 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4907938 1.00 TACR1 (0.65) TACR1CYP2D6KCNH2HTR1AHTR2A
SCHEMBL6401334 1.00 TACR1 (0.65) TACR1CYP2D6KCNH2HTR1AHTR2A
SCHEMBL4919798 0.91 TACR1 (0.66) TACR1CYP2D6KCNH2HTR1AHTR2A
SCHEMBL6400810 0.91 TACR1 (0.66) TACR1CYP2D6KCNH2HTR1AHTR2A
SCHEMBL4917686 0.91 TACR1 (0.66) TACR1CYP2D6KCNH2HTR1AHTR2A
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6405907 0.91 TACR1 (0.65) TACR1CYP2D6KCNH2HTR1AHTR2A
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6406212 0.91 TACR1 (0.65) TACR1CYP2D6KCNH2HTR1AHTR2A
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL8116125 0.91 TACR1 (0.65) TACR1CYP2D6KCNH2HTR1AHTR2A
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6406702 0.90 TACR1 (0.53) TACR1CYP2D6KCNH2HTR1AHTR2A
SCHEMBL4915733 0.89 TACR1 (0.52) TACR1CYP2D6KCNH2HTR1AHTR2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050171354-A1 Piperidinylaminomethyl trifluoromethyl cyclic ether compounds as substance P antagonists PFIZER INC. (US) 2005-08-04 US disclosed
US-20030208079-A1 Piperidinylaminomethyl trifluoromethyl cyclic ether compounds as substance P antagonists PFIZER INC. 2003-11-06 US disclosed
EP-1032571-B1 PIPERIDINYLAMINOMETHYL TRIFLUOROMETHYL CYCLIC ETHER COMPOUNDS AS SUBSTANCE P ANTAGONISTS PFIZER (US) 2002-06-12 EP disclosed
EP-1032571-A1 PIPERIDINYLAMINOMETHYL TRIFLUOROMETHYL CYCLIC ETHER COMPOUNDS AS SUBSTANCE P ANTAGONISTS PFIZER INC. (US) 2000-09-06 EP disclosed
WO-1999025714-A1 PIPERIDINYLAMINOMETHYL TRIFLUOROMETHYL CYCLIC ETHER COMPOUNDS AS SUBSTANCE P ANTAGONISTS PFIZER PHARMACEUTICALS INC. (JP) 1999-05-27 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050171354-A1 Piperidinylaminomethyl trifluoromethyl cyclic ether compounds as substance P antagonists HRH2, TACR1, HRH4 TACR1 2/4885CYP2D6 507/4885KCNH2 300/4885
US-20030208079-A1 Piperidinylaminomethyl trifluoromethyl cyclic ether compounds as substance P antagonists TACR1, HRH2, GRPR TACR1 1/4885CYP2D6 451/4885KCNH2 337/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.