SCHEMBL6404049

SCHEMBL6404049

C=CCN(C)CCCCCc1ccc2c(c1)CCN2C(=O)Nc1ccc(C(C)=O)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.41

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
RAB9A P51151 7/20 0.40
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 7/20 0.40
NPC1 O15118 6/20 0.40
TP53 P04637 4/20 0.40
MAPT P10636 4/20 0.40
POLB P06746 1/20 0.40
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.40
GAA P10253 1/20 0.39
NFKB1 P19838 4/20 0.39
NFKB2 Q00653 4/20 0.39
RELA Q04206 4/20 0.39
HTR2C P28335 1/20 0.39
FLT1 P17948 1/20 0.38
FLT4 P35916 1/20 0.38
KDR P35968 1/20 0.38
PKM P14618 3/20 0.38
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.38
MAOB P27338 1/20 0.38
LSS P48449 4/20 0.38
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL5638204 0.91 TP53 (0.49) RAB9ASMN1; SMN2NPC1TP53MAPT
SCHEMBL6400266 0.90 MAPT (0.46) RAB9ASMN1; SMN2NPC1TP53MAPT
SCHEMBL6404170 0.90 LSS (0.43) RAB9ASMN1; SMN2NPC1TP53MAPT
SCHEMBL6400584 0.90 MAPT (0.51) RAB9ASMN1; SMN2NPC1TP53MAPT
SCHEMBL5637808 0.87 SMN1; SMN2 (0.43) RAB9ASMN1; SMN2NPC1TP53MAPT
SCHEMBL6405963 0.86 LSS (0.48) MAOBLSSMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL5637681 0.82 LSS (0.40) RAB9ASMN1; SMN2NPC1TP53MAPT
SCHEMBL6403158 0.82 LSS (0.40) RAB9ATP53MAPTPOLBLMNA
SCHEMBL5637474 0.81 S1PR1 (0.38) TP53LMNALSS
SCHEMBL5637812 0.81 KDM4E (0.41) TP53MAPTPOLBLMNANFKB1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050020624-A1 Dihydroindole and tetrahydroquinoline derivatives AEBI JOHANNES (CH) 2005-01-27 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050020624-A1 Dihydroindole and tetrahydroquinoline derivatives CYP46A1, LSS, CYP51A1 RAB9A 1287/4885SMN1; SMN2 4761/4885NPC1 171/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.