SCHEMBL6446856

SCHEMBL6446856

C[C@@H]1CN(C(=O)c2ccccc2)CCN1C(=O)C(=O)c1c[nH]c2c(-c3noc(C4CC4)n3)ccc(F)c12

nearest known ligand 0.51

Predicted protein targets (top 16)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CYP2C19 P33261 5/20 0.51
CYP2D6 P10635 4/20 0.51
CYP2C9 P11712 4/20 0.51
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.49
HSD11B1 P28845 5/20 0.43
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.41
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.41
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.41
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.41
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.41
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.41
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.41
GHSR Q92847 2/20 0.39
MGLL Q99685 1/20 0.39
GRM5 P41594 1/20 0.38
CLPP Q16740 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6446853 1.00 CYP2C19 (0.51) CYP2C19CYP2D6CYP2C9CYP3A4HSD11B1
SCHEMBL6440927 0.90 CYP2C19 (0.53) CYP2C19CYP2D6CYP2C9CYP3A4GHSR
SCHEMBL6443789 0.90 CYP2D6 (0.54) CYP2C19CYP2D6CYP2C9CYP3A4GHSR
SCHEMBL6440925 0.90 CYP2C19 (0.53) CYP2C19CYP2D6CYP2C9CYP3A4GHSR
SCHEMBL6510221 0.90 CYP2D6 (0.54) CYP2C19CYP2D6CYP2C9CYP3A4GHSR
SCHEMBL6442632 0.89 CYP2C19 (0.52) CYP2C19CYP2D6CYP2C9CYP3A4GHSR
SCHEMBL6442629 0.89 CYP2C19 (0.52) CYP2C19CYP2D6CYP2C9CYP3A4GHSR
SCHEMBL6442026 0.88 CYP2D6 (0.56) CYP2C19CYP2D6CYP2C9CYP3A4GHSR
SCHEMBL6442025 0.88 CYP2D6 (0.56) CYP2C19CYP2D6CYP2C9CYP3A4GHSR
SCHEMBL6441166 0.87 CYP2D6 (0.50) CYP2C19CYP2D6CYP2C9CYP3A4HSD11B1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1299382-B1 COMPOSITION AND ANTIVIRAL ACTIVITY OF SUBSTITUTED INDOLEOXOACETIC PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO (US) 2005-09-21 EP claimed
EP-1299382-A4 COMPOSITION AND ANTIVIRAL ACTIVITY OF SUBSTITUTED INDOLEOXOACETIC PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO (US) 2004-02-11 EP claimed
US-6573262-B2 Compounds for treating mammals infected with HIV virus BRISTOL-MYERS SQIBB COMPANY 2003-06-03 US claimed
US-20030069245-A1 Composition and antiviral activity of substituted indoleoxoacetic piperazine derivatives VIIV HEALTHCARE UK (NO. 5) LIMITED (GB) 2003-04-10 US claimed
EP-1299382-A1 COMPOSITION AND ANTIVIRAL ACTIVITY OF SUBSTITUTED INDOLEOXOACETIC PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY (US) 2003-04-09 EP claimed
WO-2002004440-A1 COMPOSITION AND ANTIVIRAL ACTIVITY OF SUBSTITUTED INDOLEOXOACETIC PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY (US) 2002-01-17 WO claimed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030069245-A1 Composition and antiviral activity of substituted indoleoxoacetic piperazine derivatives IDO1, IDO2, ITPA CYP2C19 1624/4885CYP2D6 831/4885CYP2C9 2370/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.