SCHEMBL6794348

SCHEMBL6794348

CCCCN(CCCC)c1ccc(C=C2SC(=S)N(CC(=O)NS(=O)(=O)c3ccc(F)cc3)C2=O)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.49

Predicted protein targets (top 14)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ KMT2A Q03164 10/20 0.47
▸ MEN1 O00255 7/20 0.47
▸ POLB P06746 1/20 0.47
▸ HPGD P15428 1/20 0.47
▸ FFAR1 O14842 1/20 0.47
▸ ATM Q13315 1/20 0.45
▸ L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.44
▸ ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.44
▸ SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.44
▸ NPSR1 Q6W5P4 2/20 0.44
▸ RXFP1 Q9HBX9 1/20 0.44
▸ PTPN12 Q05209 1/20 0.43
▸ PTPN22 Q9Y2R2 1/20 0.43
▸ MAPT P10636 1/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6794341 1.00 KMT2A (0.47) KMT2AMEN1POLBHPGDFFAR1
SCHEMBL6785819 0.98 KMT2A (0.47) KMT2AMEN1POLBHPGDFFAR1
SCHEMBL6785816 0.98 KMT2A (0.47) KMT2AMEN1POLBHPGDFFAR1
SCHEMBL6793431 0.92 KMT2A (0.53) KMT2AMEN1POLBHPGDATM
SCHEMBL6793426 0.92 KMT2A (0.53) KMT2AMEN1POLBHPGDATM
SCHEMBL6786057 0.89 KMT2A (0.52) KMT2AMEN1POLBHPGDATM
SCHEMBL6786060 0.89 KMT2A (0.52) KMT2AMEN1POLBHPGDATM
SCHEMBL6791336 0.87 KMT2A (0.50) KMT2AMEN1POLBATML3MBTL1
SCHEMBL6791339 0.87 KMT2A (0.50) KMT2AMEN1POLBATML3MBTL1
SCHEMBL6789993 0.86 KMT2A (0.48) KMT2AMEN1POLBATML3MBTL1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1192144-A1 RHODANINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE IN INHIBITING AND IMAGING AMYLOIDS WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY (US) 2002-04-03 — — EP claimed
WO-2000076988-A1 RHODANINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE IN INHIBITING AND IMAGING AMYLOIDS WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY (US) 2000-12-21 — — WO claimed
US-20040197268-A1 Method of imaging amyloid deposits using substituted rhodanine derivatives AUGELLI-SZAFRAN CORINNE ELIZAB (US) 2004-10-07 — — US disclosed
EP-1192144-A1 RHODANINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE IN INHIBITING AND IMAGING AMYLOIDS WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY (US) 2002-04-03 — — EP disclosed
WO-2000076988-A1 RHODANINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE IN INHIBITING AND IMAGING AMYLOIDS WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY (US) 2000-12-21 — — WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20040197268-A1 Method of imaging amyloid deposits using substituted rhodanine derivatives APP, PSEN1, PSEN2 KMT2A 4348/4885MEN1 360/4885POLB 4572/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback