SCHEMBL6794534

SCHEMBL6794534

CCC1(O)C(=O)Cc2c1cc1n(c2=O)Cc2cc3cc(Cl)ccc3nc2-1

nearest known ligand 0.77

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TOP1 P11387 18/20 0.77
MEN1 O00255 3/20 0.62
KMT2A Q03164 3/20 0.62
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 3/20 0.62
KDM4E B2RXH2 3/20 0.62
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.62
CYP3A4 P08684 2/20 0.62
HBB P68871 2/20 0.62
CASP1 P29466 1/20 0.62
CASP7 P55210 1/20 0.62
TP53 P04637 2/20 0.59
GLA P06280 2/20 0.59
HPGD P15428 2/20 0.59
STAT6 P42226 1/20 0.59
CHEK1 O14757 1/20 0.59
HDAC3 O15379 1/20 0.59
ABCC4 O15439 1/20 0.59
GMNN O75496 1/20 0.59
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.59
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.59

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6789515 0.87 TOP1 (0.76) TOP1MEN1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2KDM4E
SCHEMBL1006809 0.87 TOP1 (1.00) TOP1MEN1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2KDM4E
SCHEMBL27502805 0.87 TOP1 (1.00) TOP1MEN1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2KDM4E
SCHEMBL6782602 0.86 TOP1 (0.58) TOP1MEN1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2KDM4E
SCHEMBL6788914 0.85 TOP1 (0.60) TOP1MEN1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2KDM4E
SCHEMBL6792999 0.84 TOP1 (0.61) TOP1MEN1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2KDM4E
SCHEMBL6786007 0.82 TOP1 (0.80) TOP1MEN1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2KDM4E
SCHEMBL5859831 0.80 TOP1 (0.75) TOP1MEN1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2KDM4E
SCHEMBL8322065 0.80 TOP1 (0.87) TOP1MEN1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2KDM4E
SCHEMBL6788663 0.79 TOP1 (0.72) TOP1MEN1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2KDM4E

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-6699876-B2 FOR CANCER THERAPY LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2004-03-02 US disclosed
US-20030105109-A1 For cancer therapy LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2003-06-05 US disclosed
US-6509345-B2 For therapy of cancerous diseases LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2003-01-21 US disclosed
EP-1101765-B1 Camptothecin analogues, process for their preparation and pharmaceutical compositions containing them SERVIER LAB (FR) 2002-08-14 EP disclosed
US-20020077325-A1 New camptothecin analogue compounds LAVIELLE GILBERT (FR) 2002-06-20 US disclosed
EP-1101765-A2 Camptothecin analogues, process for their preparation and pharmaceutical compositions containing them ADIR ET COMPAGNIE (FR) 2001-05-23 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030105109-A1 For cancer therapy OXER1, OXGR1, CBR1 TOP1 360/4885MEN1 4478/4885KMT2A 2823/4885
US-20020077325-A1 New camptothecin analogue compounds OXER1, CBR3, CBR1 TOP1 18/4885MEN1 4035/4885KMT2A 3602/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.