SCHEMBL7120189

SCHEMBL7120189

Cc1cc2cccc(O)c2nc1-c1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.57

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PDE10A Q9Y233 1/20 0.57
KDM4E B2RXH2 7/20 0.53
KMT2A Q03164 3/20 0.47
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.47
METAP2 P50579 1/20 0.47
PDE1A P54750 1/20 0.44
PDE1B Q01064 1/20 0.44
PDE1C Q14123 1/20 0.44
ESR1 P03372 1/20 0.42
ESR2 Q92731 1/20 0.42
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.41
POLB P06746 1/20 0.41
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.41
PKM P14618 1/20 0.41
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.41
IDO1 P14902 1/20 0.41
TDO2 P48775 1/20 0.41
ADORA2A P29274 1/20 0.40
ADORA1 P30542 1/20 0.40
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6256195 0.84 KDM4E (0.57) KDM4EKMT2AMEN1METAP2ESR1
SCHEMBL28539195 0.84 PDE10A (0.62) PDE10AKDM4EKMT2AMEN1PDE1A
SCHEMBL10913571 0.81 KDM4E (0.54) KDM4EKMT2AMEN1METAP2ESR1
SCHEMBL16597147 0.80 PDE10A (0.57) PDE10AKDM4EKMT2AMEN1PDE1A
SCHEMBL2858652 0.80 KDM4E (0.49) PDE10AKDM4EKMT2AMEN1POLB
SCHEMBL17091595 0.78 KMT2A (0.38) PDE10AKDM4EKMT2AMEN1METAP2
SCHEMBL7117069 0.78 PDE10A (0.54) PDE10AKDM4EKMT2AMEN1PDE1A
SCHEMBL4164856 0.78 PDE10A (0.54) PDE10AKDM4EKMT2AMEN1PDE1A
SCHEMBL28448323 0.77 KDM4E (0.50) KDM4EKMT2AMEN1METAP2ESR1
SCHEMBL3112677 0.77 KMT2A (0.64) PDE10AKDM4EKMT2AMEN1METAP2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-6617336-B1 Treatment of urinary incontinence, venous insufficiency, migraine or gastrointestinal disorders SANOFI-SYNTHELABO (FR) 2003-09-09 US disclosed
US-20030097000-A1 2-Phenyl-quinoline derivatives, preparation method and therapeutic use thereof SANOFI-SYNTHELABO (FR) 2003-05-22 US disclosed
EP-1242381-A2 2-PHENYL-QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES, PREPARATION METHOD AND THERAPEUTIC USE THEREOF SANOFI-SYNTHELABO (FR) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
EP-1240146-A1 2-ARYLQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES, PREPARATION AND THERAPEUTIC USE THEREOF SANOFI-SYNTHELABO (FR) 2002-09-18 EP disclosed
WO-2001044197-A2 2-PHENYL-QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS CONTRACTING AGENT FOR SMOOTH MUSCLES SANOFI-SYNTHELABO (FR) 2001-06-21 WO disclosed
WO-2001038310-A1 2-ARYLQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES, PREPARATION AND THERAPEUTIC USE THEREOF SANOFI-SYNTHELABO (FR) 2001-05-31 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030097000-A1 2-Phenyl-quinoline derivatives, preparation method and therapeutic use thereof CYP2F1, CYP4F2, CYP4F3 PDE10A 2739/4885KDM4E 3450/4885KMT2A 2884/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.