SCHEMBL829348

SCHEMBL829348

CCc1ccc2c(c1)c(-c1cccnc1OC)c(C(=O)NS(=O)(=O)c1cccc(NS(C)(=O)=O)c1)n2Cc1ccccc1F

nearest known ligand 0.42

Predicted protein targets (top 13)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PPARG P37231 7/20 0.42
SERPINE1 P05121 2/20 0.34
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.34
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.34
SCN9A Q15858 1/20 0.34
PTGDR2 Q9Y5Y4 1/20 0.34
AGTR1 P30556 2/20 0.33
AGTR2 P50052 2/20 0.33
ECE1 P42892 1/20 0.33
PTGES2 Q9H7Z7 1/20 0.33
PARG Q86W56 1/20 0.33
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.33
YWHAH Q04917 1/20 0.33

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL829588 0.90 PPARG (0.44) PPARGMEN1KMT2ASCN9APTGDR2
SCHEMBL862184 0.85 PPARG (0.39) PPARGSERPINE1MEN1KMT2AAGTR1
SCHEMBL13209993 0.82 PPARG (0.38) PPARGSCN9APTGDR2PTGES2
SCHEMBL832302 0.81 PPARG (0.40) PPARGSERPINE1MEN1KMT2APTGDR2
SCHEMBL830573 0.81 KMT2A (0.51) MEN1KMT2ALMNAYWHAH
SCHEMBL829604 0.81 KMT2A (0.43) MEN1KMT2ALMNAYWHAH
SCHEMBL832345 0.80 PPARG (0.40) PPARGSERPINE1MEN1KMT2APTGDR2
SCHEMBL8860038 0.78 PPARG (0.44) PPARGMEN1KMT2ALMNAYWHAH
SCHEMBL862897 0.78 PPARG (0.37) PPARGSERPINE1MEN1KMT2APTGDR2
SCHEMBL862510 0.78 KMT2A (0.40) MEN1KMT2APTGDR2ECE1LMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2197842-B1 2, 3-SUBSTITUTED INDOLE DERIVATIVES FOR TREATING VIRAL INFECTIONS SCHERING CORP (US) 2012-05-23 EP disclosed
US-8143305-B2 2,3-substituted indole derivatives for treating viral infections SCHERING CORPORATION (US) 2012-03-27 US disclosed
US-20110033417-A1 2,3-SUBSTITUTED INDOLE DERIVATIVES FOR TREATING VIRAL INFECTIONS MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. 2011-02-10 US disclosed
EP-2197842-A1 2, 3-SUBSTITUTED INDOLE DERIVATIVES FOR TREATING VIRAL INFECTIONS SCHERING CORPORATION (US) 2010-06-23 EP disclosed
WO-2009032116-A1 2, 3-SUBSTITUTED INDOLE DERIVATIVES FOR TREATING VIRAL INFECTIONS SCHERING CORPORATION (US) 2009-03-12 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110033417-A1 2,3-SUBSTITUTED INDOLE DERIVATIVES FOR TREATING VIRAL INFECTIONS IDO2, IDO1, IRF3 PPARG 4093/4885SERPINE1 3846/4885MEN1 2084/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.