Is AMPH p.Asp32Val (c.95A>T) pathogenic?

AMPH p.Asp32Val (c.95A>T) is classified Uncertain significance in AMPH (ClinVar, Single submitter, 1 submitter; last evaluated 2024-06-18). AlphaMissense: likely pathogenic (0.9749); Very rare (popmax 0.00458%, nfe).

How common is AMPH p.Asp32Val (c.95A>T) in the general population?

AMPH p.Asp32Val (c.95A>T) is very rare (popmax 0.00458%, nfe) (gnomAD).

What do computational predictors say about AMPH p.Asp32Val (c.95A>T)?

AlphaMissense predicts likely pathogenic (score 0.9749) — an in-silico prediction, not a clinical call.

AMPH p.Asp32Val

c.95A>T · VCV3293502

Uncertain significance Single submitter

Classification

Uncertain significance

ClinVar

Review

Single submitter ★☆☆☆

ClinVar · 1 submitter

AlphaMissense

likely pathogenic

0.9749 · ACMG-weighted

gnomAD v4.1

Rare

very rare (popmax 0.00458%, nfe)

Missense predictors

2/2 damaging

AlphaMissense, SaProt · REVEL no call

Computational evidence

Protein change
AlphaMissense	0.9749	likely pathogenic
REVEL	0.517	indeterminate
SaProt	LLR -11.46	damaging
⇒ AlphaMissense and SaProt both call this damaging; REVEL makes no call.
Splicing
SpliceAI	—	not assessed · no allele here is in the release
Constraint at this position
Conservation	phyloP 7.8	GERP 1.9, phastCons 1
Regional constraint	o/e 0.71	unconstrained · MANE · 166 kb · p 1e-06 · regional, not allelic
Overall
CADD	26.7	PHRED · no single calibrated threshold — expert panels disagree

ClinVar classifies this uncertain; the computational predictors unanimously lean damaging — a triage signal, not a reclassification

AlphaMissense carries the ACMG weight for missense; REVEL and SaProt are independent agreement signals.

Population frequency

gnomAD v4.1 · exomes + genomes

Grpmax group 0.00458% European (non-Finnish) · 54/1,180,016 alleles

Filtering AF 0.00358% ClinGen BA1/BS1 input FAF95, joint · FAF99 0.00321%

Overall 0.00335% 54/1,614,046 alleles · very rare

Rarity supports pathogenicity (ACMG PM2); frequency above a disease-specific BA1/BS1 threshold argues against it. A variant frequent in one ancestry group can be near-absent in others, so a single global figure can mislead.

Variant & gene context

Gene: AMPH
Protein: p.Asp32Val
Coding: c.95A>T
MANE Select: NM_001635
Type: single nucleotide variant
Location: chr7:38534986 (GRCh38)
Gene constraint: LOEUF 0.697 · pLI <0.01 (gnomAD)
Structure: AlphaFold pLDDT 64.84 · 6 PDB
Residue 32: the bar domain; an α-helix

Full AMPH gene report on Sugi Atlas → Gene function, pathways, protein structure, interactions & more

Similar variants

AMPH c.1017+10T>C Likely benign ★★ same type
AMPH p.Thr586Met Likely benign ★★ ⚠ same type
AMPH p.Ala10Thr Uncertain significance ★ ⚠ same type
AMPH p.Ala169Gly Uncertain significance ★ ⚠ same type
AMPH p.Ala239Ser Uncertain significance ★ ⚠ same type
AMPH p.Ala248Val Uncertain significance ★ ⚠ same type
AMPH p.Ala284Val Uncertain significance ★ ⚠ same type
AMPH p.Ala287Thr Uncertain significance ★ ⚠ same type

Built on 18 open, versioned datasets — ClinVar, gnomAD, AlphaMissense, REVEL, ClinGen & more — plus Sugi Variant's own cross-source analysis. Source data 2026-01–2026-10, ClinVar 2026-10. Full sources & versions →

Cite Sugi Variant

Gür T. Sugi Variant: A Deterministic Per-Variant Germline Reference from a Knowledge Graph for Humans and AI Agents. 2026. doi:10.5281/zenodo.21509445. This variant: https://sugi.bio/variant/amph-p-asp32val (accessed [today's date]).

Preprint & method: sugi.bio/variant/method Machine-readable: this page as Markdown