Send feedback

C8A p.Pro575Leu

c.1724C>T · rs17300936 · VCV1166647

Benign/Likely benign Multiple submitters
Classification
Benign/Likely benign
ClinVar
Review
Multiple submitters ★★☆☆
ClinVar · 5 submitters
AlphaMissense
likely benign
0.0743 · ACMG-weighted
gnomAD v4.1
Common
common (popmax 12.9%, nfe) — too common for a highly-penetrant pathogenic allele
Missense predictors
0/3 damaging
AlphaMissense, REVEL, SaProt

Computational evidence

Protein change
AlphaMissense0.0743likely benign
REVEL0.02moderately benign-leaning
SaProtLLR -5.45tolerated
⇒ AlphaMissense, REVEL and SaProt all call this tolerated.
Splicing
SpliceAI—not assessed · no allele here is in the release
Constraint at this position
ConservationphyloP -0.008GERP -0.71
Regional constrainto/e 1.08unconstrained · MANE · 63 kb · p 0.034 · regional, not allelic
Overall
CADD12.39PHRED · no single calibrated threshold — expert panels disagree

AlphaMissense carries the ACMG weight for missense; REVEL and SaProt are independent agreement signals.

Population frequency

gnomAD v4.1 · exomes + genomes
Grpmax group 12.9% European (non-Finnish) · 152,765/1,179,946 alleles
Filtering AF 12.9% ClinGen BA1/BS1 input FAF95, joint · FAF99 12.9%
Overall 11.4% 184,170/1,614,016 alleles · common
Ancestry group Frequency 1 in
Amishnot grpmax-eligible 15% 7
European (non-Finnish)grpmax 12.9% 8
Finnishnot grpmax-eligible 11% 9
Remaining individualsnot grpmax-eligible 10.9% 9
South Asian 7.65% 13
Ashkenazi Jewishnot grpmax-eligible 7.1% 14
East Asian 6.88% 15
Middle Eastern 5.72% 17
Admixed American 4.3% 23
African / African-American 3.08% 32

Amish shows a higher raw frequency than the grpmax group above it. gnomAD excludes bottlenecked groups — Finnish, Ashkenazi Jewish, Amish and “Remaining individuals” — from grpmax, because founder effects make their frequencies unrepresentative for filtering. The table is sorted by frequency, so an excluded group can sit above the grpmax row.

Rarity supports pathogenicity (ACMG PM2); frequency above a disease-specific BA1/BS1 threshold argues against it. A variant frequent in one ancestry group can be near-absent in others, so a single global figure can mislead.

Variant & gene context

Gene
C8A
Protein
p.Pro575Leu
Coding
c.1724C>T
MANE Select
NM_000562
dbSNP
rs17300936
Type
single nucleotide variant
Location
chr1:56917685 (GRCh38)
Gene constraint
LOEUF 1.168 · pLI <0.01 (gnomAD)
Structure
AlphaFold pLDDT 79.58 · 11 PDB
Residue 575
the tsp type-1 2 domain; the 'disordered' region; a disulfide bond; a UniProt-annotated variant site (in c8d1); a UniProt-annotated variant site (in)
Full C8A gene report on Sugi Atlas → Gene function, pathways, protein structure, interactions & more

Similar variants

Built on 18 open, versioned datasets — ClinVar, gnomAD, AlphaMissense, REVEL, ClinGen & more — plus Sugi Variant's own cross-source analysis. Source data 2026-01–2026-10, ClinVar 2026-10. Full sources & versions →

Cite Sugi Variant

Gür T. Sugi Variant: A Deterministic Per-Variant Germline Reference from a Knowledge Graph for Humans and AI Agents. 2026. doi:10.5281/zenodo.21509445. This variant: https://sugi.bio/variant/c8a-p-pro575leu (accessed [today's date]).

Preprint & method: sugi.bio/variant/method Machine-readable: this page as Markdown