Send feedback

DROSHA p.Ser321Leu

c.962C>T · rs55656741 · VCV3059023

Benign No assertion criteria
Classification
Benign
ClinVar
Review
No assertion criteria ☆☆☆☆
ClinVar · 1 submitter
AlphaMissense
likely benign
0.08 · ACMG-weighted
gnomAD v4.1
Common
common (popmax 49.6%, nfe) — too common for a highly-penetrant pathogenic allele
Missense predictors
0/3 damaging
AlphaMissense, REVEL, SaProt
Conditions
1
DROSHA-related disorder

Computational evidence

Protein change
AlphaMissense0.08likely benign
REVEL0.04moderately benign-leaning
SaProtLLR -7.17tolerated
⇒ AlphaMissense, REVEL and SaProt all call this tolerated.
Splicing
SpliceAI—not assessed · no allele here is in the release
Constraint at this position
ConservationphyloP 1.3GERP 1.4, phastCons 0.84
Regional constrainto/e 1.00unconstrained · MANE · 14 kb · p 0.98 · regional, not allelic
Overall
CADD17.84PHRED · no single calibrated threshold — expert panels disagree

AlphaMissense carries the ACMG weight for missense; REVEL and SaProt are independent agreement signals.

Population frequency

gnomAD v4.1 · exomes + genomes
Grpmax group 49.6% European (non-Finnish) · 567,717/1,144,472 alleles
Filtering AF 49.5% ClinGen BA1/BS1 input FAF95, joint · FAF99 49.5%
Overall 46% 712,000/1,548,624 alleles · common
Ancestry group Frequency 1 in
Amishnot grpmax-eligible 52% 2
European (non-Finnish)grpmax 49.6% 2
South Asian 47.8% 2
Finnishnot grpmax-eligible 47.1% 2
Remaining individualsnot grpmax-eligible 43.2% 2
Admixed American 42.4% 2
Ashkenazi Jewishnot grpmax-eligible 40.6% 2
Middle Eastern 37.3% 3
East Asian 19.1% 5
African / African-American 8.77% 11

Amish shows a higher raw frequency than the grpmax group above it. gnomAD excludes bottlenecked groups — Finnish, Ashkenazi Jewish, Amish and “Remaining individuals” — from grpmax, because founder effects make their frequencies unrepresentative for filtering. The table is sorted by frequency, so an excluded group can sit above the grpmax row.

Rarity supports pathogenicity (ACMG PM2); frequency above a disease-specific BA1/BS1 threshold argues against it. A variant frequent in one ancestry group can be near-absent in others, so a single global figure can mislead.

Variant & gene context

Gene
DROSHA
Protein
p.Ser321Leu
Coding
c.962C>T
MANE Select
NM_001382508
dbSNP
rs55656741
Type
single nucleotide variant
Location
chr5:31515550 (GRCh38)
Gene constraint
LOEUF 0.39 · pLI 1.00 (gnomAD)
Structure
AlphaFold pLDDT 70.94 · 12 PDB
Residue 321
a UniProt-annotated variant site (in); the 'disordered' region
Full DROSHA gene report on Sugi Atlas → Gene function, pathways, protein structure, interactions & more

Disease context

DROSHA-related disorder

Similar variants

Built on 18 open, versioned datasets — ClinVar, gnomAD, AlphaMissense, REVEL, ClinGen & more — plus Sugi Variant's own cross-source analysis. Source data 2026-01–2026-10, ClinVar 2026-10. Full sources & versions →

Cite Sugi Variant

Gür T. Sugi Variant: A Deterministic Per-Variant Germline Reference from a Knowledge Graph for Humans and AI Agents. 2026. doi:10.5281/zenodo.21509445. This variant: https://sugi.bio/variant/drosha-p-ser321leu (accessed [today's date]).

Preprint & method: sugi.bio/variant/method Machine-readable: this page as Markdown