SCHEMBL10057950

SCHEMBL10057950

CCCCCCCCc1c2c(c(CCCCCCCC)c3ccccc13)C(=O)c1c(c(CCCCCCCC)c3ccccc3c1CCCCCCCC)C2=O

nearest known ligand 0.51

Predicted protein targets (top 16)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDM4E B2RXH2 3/20 0.51
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.51
HPGD P15428 3/20 0.51
HSD17B10 Q99714 3/20 0.51
CTSV O60911 2/20 0.50
CTSL P07711 2/20 0.50
GAA P10253 1/20 0.49
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.46
PTPN1 P18031 1/20 0.46
ELANE P08246 2/20 0.44
CTSG P08311 2/20 0.44
TLR8 Q9NR97 2/20 0.43
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.43
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.43
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.42
GPR84 Q9NQS5 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL10057948 0.88 KDM4E (0.48) KDM4EALDH1A1HPGDHSD17B10CTSV
SCHEMBL9664897 0.84 KDM4E (0.51) KDM4EALDH1A1HPGDHSD17B10CTSV
SCHEMBL6536242 0.82 TLR8 (0.53) KDM4EALDH1A1HPGDHSD17B10CTSV
SCHEMBL14888955 0.82 TLR8 (0.53) KDM4EALDH1A1HPGDHSD17B10CTSV
SCHEMBL5413580 0.82 TLR8 (0.53) KDM4EALDH1A1HPGDHSD17B10CTSV
SCHEMBL11148331 0.82 TLR8 (0.53) KDM4EALDH1A1HPGDHSD17B10CTSV
SCHEMBL20943654 0.82 TLR8 (0.53) KDM4EALDH1A1HPGDHSD17B10CTSV
SCHEMBL14888795 0.82 TLR8 (0.53) KDM4EALDH1A1HPGDHSD17B10CTSV
SCHEMBL250349 0.82 KDM4E (0.50) KDM4EALDH1A1HPGDHSD17B10GAA
SCHEMBL30127786 0.82 KDM4E (0.50) KDM4EALDH1A1HPGDHSD17B10GAA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20120012822-A1 AROMATIC COMPOUND AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME KEIO UNIVERSITY (JP) 2012-01-19 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120012822-A1 AROMATIC COMPOUND AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME CCKBR, CCKAR, NPY2R KDM4E 991/4885ALDH1A1 1585/4885HPGD 2694/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.