Predicted protein targets (top 18)
| gene | UniProt | supporting neighbours | confidence | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ | TSHR | P16473 | 1/20 | 0.32 |
| ▸ | USP2 | O75604 | 1/20 | 0.32 |
| ▸ | AVPR1A | P37288 | 2/20 | 0.32 |
| ▸ | MAPT | P10636 | 2/20 | 0.31 |
| ▸ | KDM4E | B2RXH2 | 1/20 | 0.31 |
| ▸ | MEN1 | O00255 | 1/20 | 0.31 |
| ▸ | ALDH1A1 | P00352 | 1/20 | 0.31 |
| ▸ | GAA | P10253 | 1/20 | 0.31 |
| ▸ | KMT2A | Q03164 | 1/20 | 0.31 |
| ▸ | TDP1 | Q9NUW8 | 1/20 | 0.31 |
| ▸ | LMNA | P02545 | 1/20 | 0.30 |
| ▸ | TP53 | P04637 | 1/20 | 0.30 |
| ▸ | CSF1R | P07333 | 1/20 | 0.30 |
| ▸ | FLT3 | P36888 | 1/20 | 0.30 |
| ▸ | SMN1; SMN2 | Q16637 | 1/20 | 0.30 |
| ▸ | ABL1 | P00519 | 1/20 | 0.30 |
| ▸ | SRC | P12931 | 1/20 | 0.30 |
| ▸ | ROCK2 | O75116 | 1/20 | 0.30 |
Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.
Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules
Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.
| Compound | similarity | top predicted | shared targets | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHEMBL10476411 | 0.96 | CSF1R (0.31) | CSF1RFLT3ABL1SRC | |
| SCHEMBL1497139 | 0.96 | ROCK2 (0.32) | TSHRUSP2ROCK2 | |
| SCHEMBL3232056 | 0.95 | TSHR (0.34) | TSHRUSP2AVPR1AMAPTKDM4E | |
| SCHEMBL10476402 | 0.95 | USP2 (0.38) | TSHRUSP2MAPTKDM4EMEN1 | |
| SCHEMBL1496844 | 0.93 | USP2 (0.36) | TSHRUSP2MAPTKDM4EMEN1 | |
| SCHEMBL1496852 | 0.92 | ROCK2 (0.31) | ROCK2 | |
| SCHEMBL3226053 | 0.92 | ABL1 (0.32) | TSHRMAPTMEN1ALDH1A1GAA | |
| SCHEMBL1496963 | 0.91 | CASR (0.34) | TSHRUSP2MAPTKDM4EMEN1 | |
| SCHEMBL10476401 | 0.90 | HDAC1 (0.33) | — | |
| SCHEMBL3221274 | 0.90 | USP2 (0.40) | TSHRUSP2MAPTKDM4EMEN1 |
Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.
Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them
Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.
| Patent | Title | Assignee | Published | Priority | Filing | Country | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US-20120202808-A1 | NOVEL THIOPHENEDIAMINE DERIVATIVE HAVING UREA STRUCTURE | SANTEN PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. (JP) | 2012-08-09 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| EP-2292611-B1 | NOVEL THIOPHENEDIAMINE DERIVATIVE HAVING UREA STRUCTURE | SANTEN PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD (JP) | 2012-07-25 | — | — | EP | disclosed |
Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?
For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.
| Patent | Title | Text reads most about | Predicted target · text-rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| US-20120202808-A1 | NOVEL THIOPHENEDIAMINE DERIVATIVE HAVING UREA STRUCTURE | CBR1, NAT1, PRMT1 | TSHR 92/4885USP2 598/4885AVPR1A 1700/4885 |
“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.