SCHEMBL1102622

SCHEMBL1102622

Cc1ccc(-c2c3ccccc3c(-c3ccc(C)cc3)c3cnccc23)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.44

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ACHE P22303 3/20 0.44
IMPDH2 P12268 1/20 0.41
ALDH1A1 P00352 7/20 0.40
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.40
RAB9A P51151 2/20 0.40
MDM2 Q00987 1/20 0.40
KDM4E B2RXH2 4/20 0.40
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 4/20 0.40
MAPT P10636 4/20 0.40
MEN1 O00255 3/20 0.40
KMT2A Q03164 3/20 0.40
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 3/20 0.40
MAPK1 P28482 3/20 0.40
HPGD P15428 2/20 0.40
TP53 P04637 2/20 0.40
NFKB1 P19838 2/20 0.40
GMNN O75496 1/20 0.40
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.40
NR3C1 P04150 1/20 0.40
CYP1A1 P04798 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1102863 0.96 ACHE (0.45) ACHEIMPDH2ALDH1A1NPC1RAB9A
SCHEMBL16298675 0.95 ACHE (0.44) ACHEIMPDH2ALDH1A1NPC1RAB9A
SCHEMBL1102769 0.88 CYP11B1 (0.46) ALDH1A1NPC1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2HPGD
SCHEMBL1102575 0.87 KDM4E (0.39) ACHEIMPDH2ALDH1A1NPC1RAB9A
SCHEMBL1104946 0.87 CYP11B1 (0.45) ALDH1A1NPC1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2HPGD
SCHEMBL1102976 0.87 TNF (0.48) ALDH1A1NPC1RAB9AKDM4ESMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL1102677 0.86 TNF (0.47) ACHEALDH1A1KDM4ESMN1; SMN2MAPT
SCHEMBL1102806 0.86 TNF (0.47) ACHEALDH1A1KDM4ESMN1; SMN2MAPT
SCHEMBL1102798 0.86 TNF (0.47) ACHEALDH1A1KDM4ESMN1; SMN2MAPT
SCHEMBL1102900 0.86 TNF (0.47) ACHEALDH1A1KDM4ESMN1; SMN2MAPT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8153279-B2 Organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2012-04-10 US disclosed
US-8153279-B2 Organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2012-04-10 US disclosed
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-02-11 US disclosed
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-02-11 US disclosed
EP-2147962-A1 Azaanthracene-derivatives and organic electroluminescent device using the same Gracel Display Inc. (KR) 2010-01-27 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same ORMDL3, OCIAD2, OCIAD1 ACHE 1080/4885IMPDH2 1808/4885ALDH1A1 1015/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.