SCHEMBL1102632

SCHEMBL1102632

Cc1cc(C)c(C)c(-c2c3ccccc3c(-c3c(C)c(C)cc(C)c3C)c3cnccc23)c1C

nearest known ligand 0.42

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDM4E B2RXH2 4/20 0.42
TOP2A P11388 2/20 0.42
POLB P06746 2/20 0.42
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.42
HPGD P15428 2/20 0.42
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.42
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.42
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.42
GMNN O75496 1/20 0.42
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.42
NR3C1 P04150 1/20 0.42
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.42
CYP1A1 P04798 1/20 0.42
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.42
LCK P06239 1/20 0.42
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.42
GAA P10253 1/20 0.42
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.42
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.42
KIT P10721 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1102693 0.86 CYP11B1 (0.43) TOP2ANPC1CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2D6
SCHEMBL1102579 0.84 ACHE (0.46) KDM4ETOP2APOLBALDH1A1HPGD
SCHEMBL1102566 0.80 ACHE (0.47) KDM4ETOP2APOLBALDH1A1HPGD
SCHEMBL1102630 0.76 MAPK14 (0.46) KDM4ETOP2APOLBALDH1A1HPGD
SCHEMBL1102582 0.76 NPC1 (0.41) KDM4ETOP2APOLBALDH1A1HPGD
SCHEMBL1102619 0.76 KDM4E (0.50) KDM4ETOP2APOLBALDH1A1HPGD
SCHEMBL1102575 0.75 KDM4E (0.39) KDM4ETOP2APOLBALDH1A1HPGD
SCHEMBL16250770 0.75 HIPK2 (0.44) KDM4ETOP2APOLBALDH1A1HPGD
SCHEMBL1102760 0.75 CYP11B1 (0.44) ALDH1A1HPGDSMN1; SMN2CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL1102485 0.74 KDM4E (0.59) KDM4ETOP2APOLBALDH1A1HPGD

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8153279-B2 Organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2012-04-10 US disclosed
US-8153279-B2 Organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2012-04-10 US disclosed
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-02-11 US disclosed
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-02-11 US disclosed
EP-2147962-A1 Azaanthracene-derivatives and organic electroluminescent device using the same Gracel Display Inc. (KR) 2010-01-27 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same ORMDL3, OCIAD2, OCIAD1 KDM4E 3367/4885TOP2A 4551/4885POLB 2825/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.