SCHEMBL13773293

SCHEMBL13773293

CCC(=O)O[C@]1(C(=O)SCO)[C@H](C)C[C@H]2C3C[C@H](F)C4=CC(=O)C=C[C@]4(C)[C@@]3(F)[C@@H](O)C[C@@]21C

nearest known ligand 0.88

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
NR3C1 P04150 14/20 0.88
PGR P06401 6/20 0.88
AR P10275 5/20 0.88
CYP3A4 P08684 5/20 0.88
ADORA3 P0DMS8 2/20 0.88
NR3C2 P08235 2/20 0.88
NR1I2 O75469 2/20 0.88
CHRM1 P11229 1/20 0.78
ADRA1A P35348 1/20 0.78
CNR1 P21554 1/20 0.69
PTGS1 P23219 1/20 0.69
HIF1A Q16665 4/20 0.65
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 3/20 0.65
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.65
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.65
ABCB11 O95342 2/20 0.62
MAPT P10636 2/20 0.62
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.62
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.61
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.61

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL5943175 1.00 NR3C1 (0.88) NR3C1PGRARCYP3A4ADORA3
SCHEMBL195423 0.94 NR3C1 (0.90) NR3C1PGRARCYP3A4ADORA3
SCHEMBL14479087 0.94 NR3C1 (0.90) NR3C1PGRARCYP3A4ADORA3
SCHEMBL14421353 0.94 NR3C1 (0.86) NR3C1PGRARCYP3A4ADORA3
SCHEMBL13950976 0.94 NR3C1 (0.86) NR3C1PGRARCYP3A4ADORA3
Fluticasone Propionate SCHEMBL9363108 0.94 NR3C1 (0.97) NR3C1PGRARCYP3A4ADORA3
Fluticasone Propionate SCHEMBL9363101 0.94 NR3C1 (0.97) NR3C1PGRARCYP3A4ADORA3
Fluticasone Propionate SCHEMBL191133 0.94 NR3C1 (1.00) NR3C1PGRARCYP3A4ADORA3
Fluticasone Propionate SCHEMBL4111260 0.94 NR3C1 (1.00) NR3C1PGRARCYP3A4ADORA3
Fluticasone Propionate SCHEMBL13993454 0.94 NR3C1 (1.00) NR3C1PGRARCYP3A4ADORA3

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20130172587-A1 Process for the Preparation of Fluticasone Propionate GENERICS [UK] LIMITED (GB) 2013-07-04 US disclosed
US-20130172587-A1 Process for the Preparation of Fluticasone Propionate GENERICS [UK] LIMITED (GB) 2013-07-04 US disclosed
US-8344168-B2 Process for the preparation of fluticasone propionate GENERICS (UK) LIMITED (GB) 2013-01-01 US disclosed
US-8344168-B2 Process for the preparation of fluticasone propionate GENERICS (UK) LIMITED (GB) 2013-01-01 US disclosed
US-20090177001-A1 NOVEL PROCESS AND INTERMEDIATES GENERICS [UK] LIMITED (INCORPORATED IN THE UNITED KINGDOM] (GB) 2009-07-09 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20130172587-A1 Process for the Preparation of Fluticasone Propionate CYP17A1, NR5A1, CYP4F3 NR3C1 41/4885PGR 313/4885AR 108/4885
US-20090177001-A1 NOVEL PROCESS AND INTERMEDIATES CYP17A1, NR5A1, CYP21A2 NR3C1 36/4885PGR 204/4885AR 78/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.