SCHEMBL1551093

SCHEMBL1551093

Cc1c(C(=O)N[C@H](c2cccc(F)c2)C2CC2)c2cccc(F)c2c(=O)n1-c1ccc(F)nc1

nearest known ligand 0.49

Predicted protein targets (top 4)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CYP2C9 P11712 2/20 0.49
TACR3 P29371 13/20 0.46
RIPK1 Q13546 1/20 0.36
PDE2A O00408 4/20 0.36

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1551488 0.94 CYP2C9 (0.49) CYP2C9TACR3RIPK1PDE2A
SCHEMBL1550635 0.92 CYP2C9 (0.47) CYP2C9TACR3RIPK1PDE2A
SCHEMBL1550957 0.91 CYP2C9 (0.46) CYP2C9TACR3
SCHEMBL1718442 0.90 CYP2C9 (0.51) CYP2C9TACR3RIPK1PDE2A
SCHEMBL1551432 0.90 CYP2C9 (0.45) CYP2C9TACR3RIPK1PDE2A
SCHEMBL1550529 0.90 CYP2C9 (0.45) CYP2C9TACR3RIPK1PDE2A
SCHEMBL1942707 0.90 CYP2C9 (0.51) CYP2C9TACR3RIPK1PDE2A
SCHEMBL1717707 0.89 CYP2C9 (0.51) CYP2C9TACR3RIPK1PDE2A
SCHEMBL1942968 0.89 CYP2C9 (0.49) CYP2C9TACR3RIPK1PDE2A
SCHEMBL1942021 0.88 CYP2C9 (0.55) CYP2C9TACR3RIPK1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20110130407-A1 ISOQUINOLINONE DERIVATIVES AS NK3 ANTAGONISTS H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2011-06-02 US claimed
EP-2313391-A1 ISOQUINOLINONE DERIVATIVES AS NK3 ANTAGONISTS H. Lundbeck A/S (DK) 2011-04-27 EP claimed
US-8415356-B2 Isoquinolinone derivatives as NK3 antagonists H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2013-04-09 US disclosed
US-8415356-B2 Isoquinolinone derivatives as NK3 antagonists H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2013-04-09 US disclosed
US-20110130407-A1 ISOQUINOLINONE DERIVATIVES AS NK3 ANTAGONISTS H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2011-06-02 US disclosed
US-20110130407-A1 ISOQUINOLINONE DERIVATIVES AS NK3 ANTAGONISTS H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2011-06-02 US disclosed
US-20110130407-A1 ISOQUINOLINONE DERIVATIVES AS NK3 ANTAGONISTS H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2011-06-02 US disclosed
EP-2313391-A1 ISOQUINOLINONE DERIVATIVES AS NK3 ANTAGONISTS H. Lundbeck A/S (DK) 2011-04-27 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110130407-A1 ISOQUINOLINONE DERIVATIVES AS NK3 ANTAGONISTS KCNQ3, KCNK3, GRIK3 CYP2C9 2734/4885TACR3 30/4885RIPK1 3286/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.