SCHEMBL1695152

SCHEMBL1695152

COc1ccc([O])c(C(C)(C)C)c1

nearest known ligand 0.50

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ CA1 P00915 3/20 0.50
▸ CA2 P00918 3/20 0.50
▸ ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.46
▸ GAA P10253 1/20 0.46
▸ CYP1A2 P05177 2/20 0.43
▸ CYP2A6 P11509 2/20 0.43
▸ TNFRSF1A P19438 1/20 0.42
▸ LPAR1 Q92633 1/20 0.41
▸ CA12 O43570 2/20 0.40
▸ CA7 P43166 2/20 0.40
▸ CA9 Q16790 2/20 0.40
▸ CA14 Q9ULX7 2/20 0.40
▸ KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.40
▸ GSTP1 P09211 1/20 0.40
▸ CYP1A1 P04798 1/20 0.39
▸ CYP1B1 Q16678 1/20 0.39
▸ POLB P06746 1/20 0.38
▸ HPGD P15428 1/20 0.38
▸ HSD17B1 P14061 1/20 0.38
▸ HSD17B2 P37059 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL10320491 0.80 CA1 (0.56) CA1CA2ALDH1A1GAACYP1A2
SCHEMBL5546106 0.78 CA1 (0.54) CA1CA2ALDH1A1GAACYP1A2
SCHEMBL5961679 0.78 CA1 (0.64) CA1CA2ALDH1A1GAACYP1A2
SCHEMBL11165576 0.78 CA1 (0.48) CA1CA2ALDH1A1GAACYP1A2
SCHEMBL799846 0.77 ALDH1A1 (0.70) CA1CA2ALDH1A1GAACYP1A2
SCHEMBL9885331 0.77 CA1 (0.52) CA1CA2ALDH1A1GAACYP1A2
SCHEMBL14039453 0.76 CA1 (0.47) CA1CA2ALDH1A1GAALPAR1
SCHEMBL28499495 0.75 ALDH1A1 (0.58) CA1CA2ALDH1A1GAACYP1A2
SCHEMBL6142004 0.75 ALDH1A1 (0.73) CA1CA2ALDH1A1GAACYP1A2
SCHEMBL29362042 0.75 ALDH1A1 (0.73) CA1CA2ALDH1A1GAACYP1A2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-9085541-B2 Process for producing imine compounds for combating invertebrate pests BASF SE (DE) 2015-07-21 — — US disclosed
EP-2585443-B1 PROCESS FOR PRODUCING IMINE COMPOUNDS FOR COMBATING INVERTEBRATE PESTS BASF SE (DE) 2015-02-18 — — EP disclosed
EP-2585443-A1 PROCESS FOR PRODUCING IMINE COMPOUNDS FOR COMBATING INVERTEBRATE PESTS BASF SE (DE) 2013-05-01 — — EP disclosed
US-20130102462-A1 Process for Producing Imine Compounds for Combating Invertebrate Pests BASF SE (DE) 2013-04-25 — — US disclosed
WO-2011161130-A1 PROCESS FOR PRODUCING IMINE COMPOUNDS FOR COMBATING INVERTEBRATE PESTS BASF SE (DE) 2011-12-29 — — WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20130102462-A1 Process for Producing Imine Compounds for Combating Invertebrate Pests TYR, TH, IDO1 CA1 1284/4885CA2 119/4885ALDH1A1 3191/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback