SCHEMBL1714713

SCHEMBL1714713

COc1cccc(-c2ccccc2CONC(=O)c2ccccc2NCc2ccncc2)c1

nearest known ligand 0.54

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ABCB1 P08183 2/20 0.54
FLT1 P17948 3/20 0.47
KDR P35968 3/20 0.47
ABL1 P00519 2/20 0.47
CSF1R P07333 2/20 0.47
PDGFRB P09619 2/20 0.47
KIT P10721 2/20 0.47
FLT4 P35916 2/20 0.47
IGF1R P08069 1/20 0.47
FGFR1 P11362 1/20 0.47
TEK Q02763 1/20 0.47
DGAT2 Q96PD7 7/20 0.47
NAMPT P43490 1/20 0.46
GSK3B P49841 1/20 0.44
EGFR P00533 1/20 0.44
ABCG2 Q9UNQ0 1/20 0.42
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.42
CDC7 O00311 1/20 0.42
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.42
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1715670 0.90 ABCB1 (0.47) ABCB1FLT1KDRABL1CSF1R
SCHEMBL1715208 0.88 ADRA2C (0.48) FLT1KDRABL1CSF1RPDGFRB
SCHEMBL1714892 0.87 KDR (0.49) ABCB1FLT1KDRABL1CSF1R
SCHEMBL1715177 0.86 ABCB1 (0.61) ABCB1FLT1KDRABL1CSF1R
SCHEMBL1715146 0.84 POLB (0.51) ABCB1FLT1KDRABL1CSF1R
SCHEMBL1714576 0.82 POLB (0.55) ABCB1FLT1KDRABL1CSF1R
SCHEMBL1715393 0.81 NPC1 (0.52) ABCB1FLT1KDRABL1CSF1R
SCHEMBL1714888 0.81 KDR (0.48) ABCB1FLT1KDRABL1CSF1R
SCHEMBL1715575 0.79 KDR (0.52) ABCB1FLT1KDRABL1CSF1R
SCHEMBL1715552 0.79 KDR (0.43) ABCB1FLT1KDRABL1CSF1R

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 13 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8034811-B2 Hydroxamic acid esters and pharmaceutical use thereof LEO PHARMA A/S (DK) 2011-10-11 US claimed
EP-1697312-B1 HYDROXAMIC ACID ESTERS AND PHARMACEUTICAL USE THEREOF LEO PHARMA AS (DK) 2011-07-20 EP claimed
US-20070244117-A1 Novel Hydroxamic Acid Esters and Pharmaceutical Use Thereof LEO PHARMA A/S (DK) 2007-10-18 US claimed
JP-2007513098-A 2007-05-24 JP claimed
CN-1906155-A Novel hydroxamic acid esters and pharmaceutical use thereof LEO PHARMA AS (DK) 2007-01-31 CN claimed
EP-1697312-A2 HYDROXAMIC ACID ESTERS AND PHARMACEUTICAL USE THEREOF Leo Pharma A/S (DK) 2006-09-06 EP claimed
WO-2005054179-A2 HYDROXAMIC ACID ESTERS AND PHARMACEUTICAL USE THEREOF LEO PHARMA A/S (DK) 2005-06-16 WO claimed
US-8034811-B2 Hydroxamic acid esters and pharmaceutical use thereof LEO PHARMA A/S (DK) 2011-10-11 US disclosed
EP-1697312-B1 HYDROXAMIC ACID ESTERS AND PHARMACEUTICAL USE THEREOF LEO PHARMA AS (DK) 2011-07-20 EP disclosed
US-20070244117-A1 Novel Hydroxamic Acid Esters and Pharmaceutical Use Thereof LEO PHARMA A/S (DK) 2007-10-18 US disclosed
CN-1906155-A Novel hydroxamic acid esters and pharmaceutical use thereof LEO PHARMA AS (DK) 2007-01-31 CN disclosed
EP-1697312-A2 HYDROXAMIC ACID ESTERS AND PHARMACEUTICAL USE THEREOF Leo Pharma A/S (DK) 2006-09-06 EP disclosed
WO-2005054179-A2 HYDROXAMIC ACID ESTERS AND PHARMACEUTICAL USE THEREOF LEO PHARMA A/S (DK) 2005-06-16 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070244117-A1 Novel Hydroxamic Acid Esters and Pharmaceutical Use Thereof F9, F12, HDAC9 ABCB1 1567/4885FLT1 19/4885KDR 75/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.