SCHEMBL1735448

SCHEMBL1735448

CC[C@@H]1CC(=NOC)c2cc(C(F)(F)F)ccc2N1

nearest known ligand 0.35

Predicted protein targets (top 12)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
AR P10275 3/20 0.35
BRD4 O60885 1/20 0.33
CREBBP Q92793 1/20 0.33
GUSB P08236 1/20 0.32
HTR2A P28223 4/20 0.31
HTR2C P28335 3/20 0.31
HTR2B P41595 3/20 0.31
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.31
POLB P06746 1/20 0.31
PAX8 Q06710 1/20 0.30
APOBEC3A P31941 1/20 0.30
APOBEC3G Q9HC16 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1735695 1.00 AR (0.35) ARBRD4CREBBPGUSBHTR2A
SCHEMBL1735451 1.00 AR (0.35) ARBRD4CREBBPGUSBHTR2A
SCHEMBL13478819 0.86 AR (0.37) ARBRD4CREBBPKMT2A
SCHEMBL1735758 0.85 AR (0.36) ARBRD4CREBBPKMT2A
SCHEMBL1735757 0.85 AR (0.36) ARBRD4CREBBPKMT2A
SCHEMBL12066676 0.85 AR (0.36) ARBRD4CREBBPKMT2A
SCHEMBL1735760 0.85 AR (0.36) ARBRD4CREBBPKMT2A
SCHEMBL1735462 0.84 AR (0.32) ARKMT2AAPOBEC3AAPOBEC3G
SCHEMBL12156896 0.78 AR (0.38) ARBRD4CREBBPKMT2A
SCHEMBL1735446 0.78 AR (0.43) ARBRD4CREBBPHTR2AHTR2C

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 13 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8084611-B2 Process for preparing tetrahydroquinoline derivatives MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION (JP) 2011-12-27 US claimed
EP-2007728-B1 A PROCESS FOR PREPARING TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORP (JP) 2011-11-16 EP claimed
WO-2011131370-A1 MELT-GRANULATED FINGOLIMOD RATIOPHARM GMBH (DE) 2011-10-27 WO claimed
US-20090292125-A1 PROCESS FOR PREPARING TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION (JP) 2009-11-26 US claimed
EP-2007728-A1 A PROCESS FOR PREPARING TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation (JP) 2008-12-31 EP claimed
WO-2007116922-A1 A PROCESS FOR PREPARING TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION (JP) 2007-10-18 WO claimed
US-8084611-B2 Process for preparing tetrahydroquinoline derivatives MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION (JP) 2011-12-27 US disclosed
EP-2007728-B1 A PROCESS FOR PREPARING TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORP (JP) 2011-11-16 EP disclosed
WO-2011131370-A1 MELT-GRANULATED FINGOLIMOD RATIOPHARM GMBH (DE) 2011-10-27 WO disclosed
EP-2154132-A1 A process for preparing tetrahydroquinoline derivatives Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation (JP) 2010-02-17 EP disclosed
US-20090292125-A1 PROCESS FOR PREPARING TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION (JP) 2009-11-26 US disclosed
EP-2007728-A1 A PROCESS FOR PREPARING TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation (JP) 2008-12-31 EP disclosed
WO-2007116922-A1 A PROCESS FOR PREPARING TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION (JP) 2007-10-18 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090292125-A1 PROCESS FOR PREPARING TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES PCSK9, LSS, DHCR7 AR 3705/4885BRD4 210/4885CREBBP 4294/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.