SCHEMBL18758323

SCHEMBL18758323

O=[N+]([O-])c1ccc(-n2ccc(Br)n2)cc1C(F)(F)F

nearest known ligand 0.54

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
AR P10275 11/20 0.54
SIRT6 Q8N6T7 1/20 0.51
LMNA P02545 5/20 0.50
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 3/20 0.50
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.50
CYP3A4 P08684 3/20 0.47
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.47
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.47
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 2/20 0.47
CYP1A2 P05177 2/20 0.47
PGR P06401 2/20 0.47
CYP2C9 P11712 2/20 0.47
TSHR P16473 2/20 0.47
CYP2C19 P33261 2/20 0.47
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.47
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.47
ALOX12 P18054 1/20 0.47
NFKB1 P19838 1/20 0.47
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.47
PDE4D Q08499 1/20 0.47

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL18758226 0.82 ATM (0.46) ARSIRT6LMNASMN1; SMN2HPGD
SCHEMBL29229681 0.82 AR (0.66) ARSIRT6LMNASMN1; SMN2HPGD
SCHEMBL29229651 0.81 AR (0.57) ARSIRT6LMNASMN1; SMN2HPGD
SCHEMBL29229645 0.79 AR (0.63) ARSIRT6LMNASMN1; SMN2HPGD
SCHEMBL30506378 0.79 AR (0.54) ARSIRT6LMNASMN1; SMN2HPGD
SCHEMBL23701930 0.78 AR (0.62) ARSIRT6LMNASMN1; SMN2HPGD
SCHEMBL29229670 0.78 AR (0.70) ARSIRT6LMNASMN1; SMN2HPGD
SCHEMBL28983834 0.77 HTT (0.46) LMNASMN1; SMN2HPGDCYP3A4MEN1
SCHEMBL18758228 0.76 NOTUM (0.38) AR
SCHEMBL23714051 0.74 AR (0.55) ARSIRT6LMNASMN1; SMN2HPGD

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-10874646-B2 Epothilone analogs, methods of synthesis, methods of treatment, and drug conjugates thereof WILLIAM MARSH RICE UNIVERSITY (US) 2020-12-29 US disclosed
US-20190022069-A1 EPOTHILONE ANALOGS, METHODS OF SYNTHESIS, METHODS OF TREATMENT, AND DRUG CONJUGATES THEREOF WILLIAM MARSH RICE UNIVERSITY (US) 2019-01-24 US disclosed
WO-2017066606-A1 EPOTHILONE ANALOGS, METHODS OF SYNTHESIS, METHODS OF TREATMENT, AND DRUG CONJUGATES THEREOF WILLIAM MARSH RICE UNIVERSITY (US) 2017-04-20 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-10874646-B2 Epothilone analogs, methods of synthesis, methods of treatment, and drug conjugates thereof EPOR, CD47, DHPS AR 1330/4885SIRT6 3036/4885LMNA 2828/4885
US-20190022069-A1 EPOTHILONE ANALOGS, METHODS OF SYNTHESIS, METHODS OF TREATMENT, AND DRUG CONJUGATES THEREOF EPOR, CD47, DHPS AR 1330/4885SIRT6 3036/4885LMNA 2828/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.